Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #111713

Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"

From acc <email@farlocca.it>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c, comp.lang.clipper
Subject Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"
Date 2017-06-07 17:55 +0200
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <oh97m8$7ps$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <6d656aa9-f2a8-46a0-86fc-950e3d495fa9@googlegroups.com> <oh2klr$e8s$5@dont-email.me> <oh5c35$edr$1@pcls7.std.com> <59ucjc9fk7fosbrf8mkc2r8rj1j5ucfeqb@4ax.com> <oh93ji$o18$4@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Il 07/06/2017 16.49, Mr. Man-wai Chang ha scritto:

> "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"
>
> It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called
> Hamming Distance.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
  Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" acc <email@farlocca.it> - 2017-06-07 17:55 +0200
    Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 20:42 +0100
    Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-09 22:05 +0800

csiph-web