Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #111701 > unrolled thread

Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"

Started by"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
First post2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
Last post2017-06-09 22:05 +0800
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
    Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" acc <email@farlocca.it> - 2017-06-07 17:55 +0200
      Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 20:42 +0100
      Re: Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-06-09 22:05 +0800

#111701 — Hamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-07 22:49 +0800
SubjectHamming distance: "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"
Message-ID<oh93ji$o18$4@dont-email.me>
On 6/6/2017 5:43 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> Was the word supposed to be "coffee" by chance? "Covfefe" is two typos
>> different from "coffee", and the typos could have been caused by either
>> not enough or way too much coffee.
> 
> It was supposed to be "coverage."
> 

"covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"

It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called 
Hamming Distance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance


-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#111713

Fromacc <email@farlocca.it>
Date2017-06-07 17:55 +0200
Message-ID<oh97m8$7ps$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#111701
Il 07/06/2017 16.49, Mr. Man-wai Chang ha scritto:

> "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"
>
> It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called
> Hamming Distance.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#111748

FromGareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-07 20:42 +0100
Message-ID<871sqv60uv.fsf@gmail.com>
In reply to#111713
acc <email@farlocca.it> writes:

> Il 07/06/2017 16.49, Mr. Man-wai Chang ha scritto:
>
>> "covfefe" vs "coffee" vs "coverage"
>>
>> It's still a better explanation than "coverage". I think it's called
>> Hamming Distance.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamming_distance
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance

In Levenshtein distance COFFEE is much the closer word.
The reason people think its COVERAGE is from the context.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#111877

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2017-06-09 22:05 +0800
Message-ID<ohe9ok$t5f$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#111713
On 7/6/2017 11:55 PM, acc wrote:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance

Thanks! One more name that's hard to remember.... dark magic? :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c


csiph-web