Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #51028
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed |
| Date | 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <g17ej9F4p2jU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <270920181639029366%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g16pklFgl3U1@mid.individual.net> <280920180952423493%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g179rsF3oilU1@mid.individual.net> <280920181426399767%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 28/09/2018 14.26, nospam wrote:
> In article <g179rsF3oilU1@mid.individual.net>, Carlos E. R.
> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>>> there are several encrypted email services which guarantees that nobody
>>>>> other than the sender or recipient can read the contents, which are
>>>>> used by lawyers and many others who want secure transit. some are free,
>>>>> some offer paid tiers above free and some are paid only, depending on
>>>>> various options such as number of mailboxes, email volume, custom
>>>>> domain, etc. some are open source and can be audited. at least one
>>>>> lists gdpr compliance.
>>>>>
>>>>> don't dismiss it because of your own unfamiliarity with the products.
>>>>
>>>> Does that include setting PGP on his own?
>>>
>>> no.
>>>
>>>> Or does it assume that his IT
>>>> professional hired by the bureau sets that or some other service?
>>>
>>> no.
>>
>> Then it does not apply for a law bureau.
>
> it does not disqualify it for being used.
>
> you don't speak for all law bureaus nor are you familiar with all
> available options.
>
And you do? ROTFL! X'-)
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 14:11 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 15:20 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 17:49 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0600
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 16:40 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-09-24 08:37 -0700
csiph-web