Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #50905
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed |
| Date | 2018-09-24 16:40 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnpqi4rm.6s3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> (permalink) |
| References | <309a76cf8bed5568f4d87d680befa055@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <g0quv3Fhk7dU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnpqhf19.6s3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> <pob1v4$udi$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> |
Grant Taylor wrote: > On 09/24/2018 04:27 AM, Dan Purgert wrote: >> PGP uses the "Web of Trust" model, rather than the x.509 "Chain of >> Trust", but it does rely on you trusting people who in turn trust the >> signer's key. For example, none of you likely trust the signature on >> this message very far :). > > That's one way to use PGP. Another is to exchange public key signatures > / hashes via Out of Band methods with the party in question. Oh right, forgot about that one this morning. > >> To be fair, that's the same problem with S/MIME -- no telling whether >> or not the machine itself was compromised. > > IMHO neither PGP nor S/MIME are meant to defend against a compromised > machine. - If you're worried about that, you have bigger issues. Indeed. > [...] >> Honestly, the best way around that is physical -- i.e. "come down to >> the office and ..."; > > You don't have to conduct all transactions in person. That's also > subject to disguises. > > You need to establish a seed of trust in person (or over the phone) and > then use that seed of trust for remote communications. Yeah, I never said that physical was the *only* way to conduct business. > [...] >> rather than acting on instructions received via electronic means (in fact, >> that's how several businesses I interact with are - you either have to >> walk into their office, or use the phone [although phone instructions >> can be rejected if they're "doing too much"]). > > IMHO it's better to establish a seed of trust that can easily be > leveraged remotely to provide better security and enable remote > transactions. Oh, the businesses do both - but they only extend the "seed of trust(tm)" so far. Like my finance/ insurance people will accept a lot of instructions over the phone; but "hey, I need to put >$10k into $account" is a "we can't do that over the phone" transaction. Realistically, that *might* be banking regulations moreso than anything, never thought to dig into it further (because, let's face it, if I have $10k to be moving around in one go, I probably have a lot of other paperwork to fill out). -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 14:11 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 15:20 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 17:49 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0600
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 16:40 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-09-24 08:37 -0700
csiph-web