Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #66425

Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed

From "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed
Date 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
Message-ID <g179rsF3oilU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <g14lv6FhnobU1@mid.individual.net> <pojkai.ar4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <270920181639029366%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g16pklFgl3U1@mid.individual.net> <280920180952423493%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 28/09/2018 09.52, nospam wrote:
> In article <g16pklFgl3U1@mid.individual.net>, Carlos E. R.
> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>> He needs to pay someone that says "yes, this is safe". With a
>>>>>>>>> contract.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not if he uses a free service that states that, which i said exist.
>>>>
>>>>   A *lawyer*, trusting a *free* service saying "yes, this is safe"!?
>>>
>>> there are several encrypted email services which guarantees that nobody
>>> other than the sender or recipient can read the contents, which are
>>> used by lawyers and many others who want secure transit. some are free,
>>> some offer paid tiers above free and some are paid only, depending on
>>> various options such as number of mailboxes, email volume, custom
>>> domain, etc. some are open source and can be audited. at least one
>>> lists gdpr compliance.
>>>
>>> don't dismiss it because of your own unfamiliarity with the products.
>>
>> Does that include setting PGP on his own?
> 
> no.
> 
>> Or does it assume that his IT
>> professional hired by the bureau sets that or some other service?
> 
> no.
> 

Then it does not apply for a law bureau.

> this applies to you too:
>>> don't dismiss it because of your own unfamiliarity with the products.


-- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E.R.

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
  Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
    Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
    Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
      Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
        Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
          Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
            Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
              Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400

csiph-web