Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #51014
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed |
| Date | 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <g16pklFgl3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <g14dmrFg12cU1@mid.individual.net> <270920181215330809%nospam@nospam.invalid> <g14lv6FhnobU1@mid.individual.net> <pojkai.ar4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <270920181639029366%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 27/09/2018 16.39, nospam wrote:
> In article <pojkai.ar4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>, Frank Slootweg
> <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
>
>>
>>>>>>> He needs to pay someone that says "yes, this is safe". With a contract.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not if he uses a free service that states that, which i said exist.
>>
>> A *lawyer*, trusting a *free* service saying "yes, this is safe"!?
>
> there are several encrypted email services which guarantees that nobody
> other than the sender or recipient can read the contents, which are
> used by lawyers and many others who want secure transit. some are free,
> some offer paid tiers above free and some are paid only, depending on
> various options such as number of mailboxes, email volume, custom
> domain, etc. some are open source and can be audited. at least one
> lists gdpr compliance.
>
> don't dismiss it because of your own unfamiliarity with the products.
Does that include setting PGP on his own? Or does it assume that his IT
professional hired by the bureau sets that or some other service?
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 14:11 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 15:20 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 17:49 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0600
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 16:40 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400
Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-09-24 08:37 -0700
csiph-web