Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #66414

Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 27/09/2018 12.15, nospam wrote:
> > In article <g14dmrFg12cU1@mid.individual.net>, Carlos E. R.
> > <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> >>>>>>>>>> People with which I needed to use encryption were unable to set any
> >>>>>>>>>> encryption method up. A lawyer, for instance. I would have to go to
> >>>>>>>>>> his
> >>>>>>>>>> office and teach him.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> use an encrypted email service. there's nothing to set up. all they
> >>>>>>>>> need is a browser or an app on their phone.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That would require a binding contract and spend money, which they did
> >>>>>>>> not want to do.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> no it wouldn't. it only needs a mutual agreement to use an encrypted
> >>>>>>> medium. there are free options as well as paid ones. choose whichever
> >>>>>>> one works best for all parties involved.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not for a lawyer, it wouldn't. He would be directly liable if the email
> >>>>>> gets intercepted or somehow compromised.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it's actually ideal for a lawyer, since it's basically impossible to
> >>>>> intercept and crack end-to-end encrypted email unless the passcode is
> >>>>> something trivially guessed.
> >>>>
> >>>> We know that. He may or may not, but that would be irrelevant. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> He needs to pay someone that says "yes, this is safe". With a contract.
> >>>
> >>> not if he uses a free service that states that, which i said exist.
> >>
> >> Not valid enough for the lawyer. He needs someone to sue.
> > 
> > not for every item he uses.
> 
> Something as crucial as mail? Certainly. Ask them...

  I don't know about you, but I found this part quite funny, not to say
hilarious:

> >>>> He needs to pay someone that says "yes, this is safe". With a contract.
> >>>
> >>> not if he uses a free service that states that, which i said exist.

  A *lawyer*, trusting a *free* service saying "yes, this is safe"!?

  nospam at his best!

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201809.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2018-09-23 19:45 +0000
  Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:03 -0400
    Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-09-24 10:27 +0000
    Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-24 07:48 -0500
      Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:18 -0400
        Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed anon <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
          Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-25 10:26 -0400
            Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2018-09-25 17:17 +0200
              Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:16 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:47 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:56 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-26 22:20 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 00:43 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:21 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:52 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:15 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:31 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-09-27 20:07 +0000
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:39 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:45 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 09:52 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:22 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:26 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:43 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:54 -0400
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 06:52 +0100
                Re: Good example why business emails should be PGP'ed "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:22 -0400

csiph-web