Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.linux > #70497

Re: Any Unicode Experts?

From Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Any Unicode Experts?
Date 2021-08-08 04:32 +0000
Organization Some absurd concept
Message-ID <eli$2108080032@qaz.wtf> (permalink)
References <sejhjm022lo@news2.newsguy.com> <eli$2108061626@qaz.wtf> <selgna$b2l$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.os.linux.misc, The Natural Philosopher  <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 06/08/2021 21:27, Eli the Bearded wrote:
> > Null and horizontal tab get a lot of use still. Vertical tab and
> > form feed get a little. Arguably escape and backspace get used (eg
> > terminal control sequences). Whatever the status of the rest vis-a-vis
> > newly composed documents, their meanings remain unchanged for historical
> > documents.
> Ctrl-Z and Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V have a lot of use too

I type those, and others like ctrl-W, ctrl-U, ctrl-F, ctrl-B, ctrl-D,
ctrl-R, etc, reasonably often, but I don't encounter them in files,
unlike the ones I named. (I have checked-in files at github with embedded
terminal control sequences.) So those _feel_ different. The stty
settings are just defaults, and can be changed. There's nothing special
about the characters. The ones I use in vi, not in stty, are are not
changable, but are based on mnemonics instead of ASCII meaning. I use
ctrl-F for "forward page" not for ACK.

The stty ones:
    intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
    eol2 = <undef>; swtch = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z;
    rprnt = ^R; werase = ^W; lnext = ^V; discard = ^O;

Of those that have settings, only discard do I not use. Stop, I use, but
usually by accident and then I have to start again. I'd like that one to
default to undef, but I log in to too many computers per day to bother
trying to manually set it. Reprint, escape next (lnext), and quit I use
fairly rarely, but when I need them there's no substitute.

Oh, wait, you're thinking of Windows short cuts. I don't think they are
meant to map to a character _ever_. Those are just key press events
caught by the OS / program, same as command keys in Macs.

Ctrl-C for Copy I think exists because Command-C for copy first existed.
Neither has anything to do with the ASCII control character ETX.

> Indeed not. They are handy as with all 'out of band' text characters as 
> control characters on communications streams that could conceivably be 
> useful again sometime in the future

I like tab separated values more than comma separated values, because
with rare exceptions[*], tabs in text can be converted to spaces without
loss of meaning, so I can have a separator that never needs quoting. But
using ASCII RS (ctrl-^) for it's intended purpose as a record separator
just feels obsolent and wrong to me, even if it is even less likely to
appear in the sort of things I put into TSV files.

[*] And the sorts of things that do need raw tabs, like Makefiles, I
    don't put in TSV files.

Elijah
------
in two minutes of testing could not get ^O (discard) to do anything

Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 14:39 +0000
  Re: Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:01 +0000
    Re: Any Unicode Experts? Snit Michael Glasser <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 08:10 -0700
  US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-06 08:15 -0700
    Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 17:36 +0200
      Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:49 +0000
        Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 18:48 +0200
        Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 17:57 +0000
  Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-06 20:27 +0000
    Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-07 09:36 +0100
      Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-08 04:32 +0000
        Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-07 22:50 -0600
          Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-08 20:32 +0200
            Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 18:00 -0600
              "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-08 18:11 -0700
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 22:19 -0600
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Ann Glaser <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 14:57 -0700
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2021-08-16 16:06 +0200
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. HHI <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-17 11:42 -0700
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. STALKING_TARGET_27 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-19 16:20 -0700
                Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:02 +0200
                while(malloc(666)); Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-10 09:28 -0700
                Re: while(malloc(666)); jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:39 +0200
              Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-09 07:28 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-09 07:56 -0600
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 10:33 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-10 12:49 +0100
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 15:26 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-08-10 13:43 +0000
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-10 21:12 -0600
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-11 12:25 +0100
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 09:54 -0700
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 10:58 -0700
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-11 16:52 +0000
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-11 20:19 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-12 16:37 +0000
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-12 20:32 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-12 20:40 -0600
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steven Petruzzellis - fretwizen <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:14 -0700
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-15 05:19 -0700
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? STALKING_TARGET_79 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-13 15:09 -0700
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-08-10 16:11 -0400
      Re: Any Unicode Experts? STALKING_TARGET_53 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-08 14:40 -0700

csiph-web