Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #157351 > unrolled thread

recommended free email?

Started byhancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
First post2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
Last post2016-01-23 18:42 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 66 — 22 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers


Contents

  recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
    Re: recommended free email? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
      Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
    Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
      Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
          Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
    Re: recommended free email? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
      Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
      Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
        Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
      Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
        Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
          Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:34 +1100
        Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:00 -0600
          Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:22 -0600
            Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-28 11:46 -0500
              Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:36 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-31 11:03 -0500
                  Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 17:29 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 09:25 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:31 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 13:54 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 14:58 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 15:35 +0000
            Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 16:04 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:42 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:39 -0500
        Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:43 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 10:56 +0000
            Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:27 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000
            Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:53 -0600
              Re: recommended free email? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-25 08:22 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:25 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 13:32 +0100
              Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:21 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-25 14:18 +0000
                  Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:54 -0800
                    Re: recommended free email? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:56 -0600
                      Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:10 -0800
                        Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
                          Re: recommended free email? Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:32 -0500
                            Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:15 -0600
                              Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 10:33 -0800
                                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
                                  Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000
                                    Re: recommended free email? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-06 20:20 +0300
                              Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:50 +0000
                          Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:06 -0800
                            Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 16:13 -0600
                              Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:32 -0600
                            Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:20 -0600
                          Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 -0500
                    Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 15:45 -0600
                    Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:24 +0000
                    Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:11 -0600
                  Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:42 +0000

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →


#157351 — recommended free email?

Fromhancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
Date2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
Subjectrecommended free email?
Message-ID<4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com>
Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?

--AOL

--GMAIL

--YAHOO

others?

Thanks!

P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
your email contacts.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#157355

Fromphilo <philo@privacy.net>
Date2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
Message-ID<n7tu17$e5o$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#157351
On 01/22/2016 12:16 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>
> --AOL
>
> --GMAIL
>
> --YAHOO
>
> others?
>
> Thanks!
>
> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.
>



Gmail for sure

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157356

Frommausg@mail.com
Date2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
Message-ID<slrnna4vbo.193.mausg@smaus.org>
In reply to#157355
On 2016-01-22, philo <philo@privacy.net> wrote:
> On 01/22/2016 12:16 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>>
>> --AOL
>>
>> --GMAIL
>>
>> --YAHOO
>>
>> others?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
>> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
>> your email contacts.
>>
>
>
>
> Gmail for sure

Good spam filter. My ISP mail service allows in about 6 sorta-spams
a week.


-- 
greymaus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157358

FromMichael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
Date2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
Message-ID<alpine.LNX.2.02.1601221418070.3907@darkstar.example.org>
In reply to#157355
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, philo wrote:

> On 01/22/2016 12:16 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>> 
>> --AOL
>> 
>> --GMAIL
>> 
>> --YAHOO
>> 
>> others?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
>> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
>> your email contacts.
>> 
>
>
>
> Gmail for sure
>
I think at this point the others are way secondary to gmail.

I have three gmail accounts, but I'd not use them for anything important.

I was at my first ISP for nine years, I've been at my current ISP for ten, 
though at this point I'm not actually getting access from them, just a 
shell account, a webpage and email.  But I keep paying after getting DSL 
for continuity sake.

I post from the Ottawa Freenet, I give them a $20 donation once a year 
because I'm not actually getting internet access from them, but they have 
good Usenet.  I've had membership there since about 2003, so that's 
another way to get an email account that's longstanding but separate from 
internet access. Though at this point I'm not sure how many freenets still 
exist.  But free is free, it's not paid for by big advertising like so 
much of the internet has become "free".  I don't count on the Freenet for 
email because I've just never given it out to people other than on Usenet, 
but if I had to, I'd drop the second ISP and just keep the email at the 
Freenet.

Sadly the days are gone when the internet was seen as a revolutionary 
space, so now everyone flocks to the big ISPs (and flips at a moment 
notice if they don't like the service) and gives everything to commerce, 
when there are still smaller ISPs one can dig out, or things like the 
Freenet which at least started in the days when such things matter.

   Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157362

FromDave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Date2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
Message-ID<n7u00n$n3f$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#157351
On 1/22/2016 12:16 PM, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>
> --AOL
>
> --GMAIL
>
> --YAHOO
>
> others?
>
> Thanks!

Gmail is very good, so long as you don't mind sharing the contents of 
your mail with google.

> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.

Yes. Another way is to purchase your own domain (e.g. hancock4, 
$5-15/year depending on what top-level domain it is), and have the 
domain registrar (I like namecheap.com) forward mail to the mailbox 
you're actually using.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157369

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
Message-ID<20160122203158.e736a60fd3d93f743400f836@eircom.net>
In reply to#157362
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:32:57 -0600
Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> wrote:

> Yes. Another way is to purchase your own domain (e.g. hancock4, 
> $5-15/year depending on what top-level domain it is), and have the 
> domain registrar (I like namecheap.com) forward mail to the mailbox 
> you're actually using.

	Or even better run an MTA and point your domain MX record to it.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157374

FromDave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Date2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
Message-ID<n7ucp3$ct0$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#157369
On 1/22/2016 2:31 PM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:32:57 -0600
> Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. Another way is to purchase your own domain (e.g. hancock4,
>> $5-15/year depending on what top-level domain it is), and have the
>> domain registrar (I like namecheap.com) forward mail to the mailbox
>> you're actually using.
>
> 	Or even better run an MTA and point your domain MX record to it.
>
Indeed. But that's complicating things quite a bit beyond spending 5 
minutes with a web "control panel".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157375

FromMichael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
Date2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
Message-ID<alpine.LNX.2.02.1601221909040.4594@darkstar.example.org>
In reply to#157374
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Dave Garland wrote:

> On 1/22/2016 2:31 PM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:32:57 -0600
>> Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes. Another way is to purchase your own domain (e.g. hancock4,
>>> $5-15/year depending on what top-level domain it is), and have the
>>> domain registrar (I like namecheap.com) forward mail to the mailbox
>>> you're actually using.
>>
>> 	Or even better run an MTA and point your domain MX record to it.
>> 
> Indeed. But that's complicating things quite a bit beyond spending 5 minutes 
> with a web "control panel".
>
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.

   Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157366

FromPeter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com>
Date2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
Message-ID<1268266160.475188209.735714.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#157351
<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
> 
> --AOL
> 
> --GMAIL
> 
> --YAHOO
> 
> others?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.
> 

I use mostly Yahoo and a little gmail.  I pay Yahoo $25 a year or so for
ad-free access.  I'm not dissatisfied with either.

-- 
Pete

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157370

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
Message-ID<n7u6dr1apg@news4.newsguy.com>
In reply to#157366
On 2016-01-22, Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote:

> <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>
>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>> 
>> --AOL
>> 
>> --GMAIL
>> 
>> --YAHOO
>> 
>> others?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
>> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
>> your email contacts.
>
> I use mostly Yahoo and a little gmail.  I pay Yahoo $25 a year or so for
> ad-free access.  I'm not dissatisfied with either.

After going through a couple of small ISPs I wound up at surfnaked.ca -
who could resist an e-mail address like that?  Through various acquisitions
it would up belonging to Uniserve, but they were wise enough to retain the
original domain name in addition to their own.

I wouldn't want to go to a huge conglomerate like gmail, for various
reasons that others have already mentioned - plus the fact that staying
with a smaller independent provider is more in keeping with the original
spirit of the Internet.  When I went DSL I signed up with Telus (the
local telco); I could receive e-mail through them, but I hung on to
my surfnaked account and just use Telus's SMTP server for posting.

-- 
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157367

FromJon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com>
Date2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
Message-ID<8o2dndSovbd4CD_LnZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#157351
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:

> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
> 
> --AOL
> 
> --GMAIL
> 
> --YAHOO
> 
> others?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.
Yes, exactly!

I run my own home business email server, but when away, neither my work or 
ISP systems allow me to send email through their SMTP servers when outside 
their networks.  So, I finally got a gmail account ONLY to send emails when 
on the road.  It works, but I don't know how well it would work as your only 
email system.

Jon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157382

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
Message-ID<20160123045847.860225bffea3b47ba9da2616@eircom.net>
In reply to#157367
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:49:42 -0600
Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> wrote:

> I run my own home business email server, but when away, neither my work
> or ISP systems allow me to send email through their SMTP servers when
> outside their networks.

	I solved that problem with a VPN into my home LAN, which also gives
me access to my IMAP server without exposing it outside my LAN.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157372

FromHuge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid>
Date2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
Message-ID<dgfq4pF97qoU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#157351
On 2016-01-22, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>
> --AOL
>
> --GMAIL
>
> --YAHOO
>
> others?
>
> Thanks!
>
> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.

Buy a domain, then it doesn't matter.


-- 
Today is Boomtime, the 22nd day of Chaos in the YOLD 3182
                  I don't have an attitude problem.
    If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157958

FromJon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu>
Date2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
Message-ID<s4SdnZg2BZOnsjTLnZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#157372
Huge wrote:

> On 2016-01-22, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is
>> best?
>>
>> --AOL
>>
>> --GMAIL
>>
>> --YAHOO
>>
>> others?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
>> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
>> your email contacts.
> 
> Buy a domain, then it doesn't matter.
> 
> 
Well, you need to have a SMTP server that answers at that domain address, 
too.  (I guess a lot of domain registrars provide that service, too, but at 
extra cost.)

Jon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157967

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
Message-ID<20160127214718.3715d4450957fc54ad6d056d@eircom.net>
In reply to#157958
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:57:51 -0600
Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote:

> Well, you need to have a SMTP server that answers at that domain address, 
> too.  (I guess a lot of domain registrars provide that service, too, but
> at extra cost.)

	Most will provide a catch-all forwarding service as part of the
package, along with name servers.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157378

From"kipg" <io@nospam.com>
Date2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
Message-ID<dgg531Fbnf9U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#157351

<hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
news:4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com...
> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>
> --AOL
>
> --GMAIL

That works fine and has a very decent automatic spam filter
that works very well.

Some don't like the idea that google snoops on your email.

> --YAHOO

Works fine too.

> others?
>
> Thanks!
>
> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
> your email contacts.

Yeah, the ISP free email is to be avoided for that reason. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157401

FromMichael Black <et472@ncf.ca>
Date2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
Message-ID<alpine.LNX.2.02.1601231053280.5652@darkstar.example.org>
In reply to#157378
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, kipg wrote:

>
>
> <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
> news:4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com...
>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>> 
>> --AOL
>> 
>> --GMAIL
>
> That works fine and has a very decent automatic spam filter
> that works very well.
>
Does it?

I have one gmail account that I check multiple times, I use it to get 
basically junk mail (all those stores trying to lure me in by offering 
deals).  I rarely get spam there.

But the other two get a lot.  Actually, the reason I got one of them is 
long in the past, but there is a constant flow of email from I don't know 
where.  Near as I can tell, someone went around and gave out the wrong 
gmail address, so is started getting it.  It's all either mailing lists or 
someone sending out to their list of contacts.  That gets spam, but not 
that much.

The third is the one I gave my sister, and there's a trickle of real email 
there.  But, the spam is amazing.  Not only lots of it, but I swear it's 
related to my sister's use of gmail, since there is a lot of dog and 
health related stuff.  Almost relevant, but I sure didn't ask for it.

So I suspect gmail is more careful with accounts that get used regularly, 
but that's speculation.

   Michael



  > Some don't like the idea that google snoops on your email.
>
>> --YAHOO
>
> Works fine too.
>
>> others?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> P.S.  Someone suggested _not_ to use the email from your ISP (ie.
>> comcast.net) because if you change ISP's, you have to change all
>> your email contacts.
>
> Yeah, the ISP free email is to be avoided for that reason. 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157405

Frommausg@mail.com
Date2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
Message-ID<slrnna7bo6.18i.mausg@smaus.org>
In reply to#157401
On 2016-01-23, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, kipg wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message 
>> news:4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com...
>>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is best?
>>> 
>>> --AOL
>>> 
>>> --GMAIL
>>
>> That works fine and has a very decent automatic spam filter
>> that works very well.
>>
> Does it?
>
> I have one gmail account that I check multiple times, I use it to get 
> basically junk mail (all those stores trying to lure me in by offering 
> deals).  I rarely get spam there.
>
> But the other two get a lot.  Actually, the reason I got one of them is 
> long in the past, but there is a constant flow of email from I don't know 
> where.  Near as I can tell, someone went around and gave out the wrong 
> gmail address, so is started getting it.  It's all either mailing lists or 
> someone sending out to their list of contacts.  That gets spam, but not 
> that much.
>
> The third is the one I gave my sister, and there's a trickle of real email 
> there.  But, the spam is amazing.  Not only lots of it, but I swear it's 
> related to my sister's use of gmail, since there is a lot of dog and 
> health related stuff.  Almost relevant, but I sure didn't ask for it.
>
> So I suspect gmail is more careful with accounts that get used regularly, 
> but that's speculation.
>
>    Michael

One could take it that the NSA reads your mail, automatically. 
I hope I am too small a fish for them to be interested in.
I gmailed my son that I was having trouble with an uncontrolled dog.
Next visit to gmail, I had ads for pet kennels, etc. I wwould hope its
just an automaatic search for special terms, (Kinda like Eliza) 



-- 
greymaus
 .
  .
...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157416

From"kipg" <io@nospam.com>
Date2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
Message-ID<dghscdFp1i6U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#157405

<mausg@mail.com> wrote in message news:slrnna7bo6.18i.mausg@smaus.org...
> On 2016-01-23, Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, kipg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com...
>>>> Would anyone care to recommend what free email service they think is 
>>>> best?
>>>>
>>>> --AOL
>>>>
>>>> --GMAIL
>>>
>>> That works fine and has a very decent automatic spam filter
>>> that works very well.
>>>
>> Does it?
>>
>> I have one gmail account that I check multiple times, I use it to get
>> basically junk mail (all those stores trying to lure me in by offering
>> deals).  I rarely get spam there.
>>
>> But the other two get a lot.  Actually, the reason I got one of them is
>> long in the past, but there is a constant flow of email from I don't know
>> where.  Near as I can tell, someone went around and gave out the wrong
>> gmail address, so is started getting it.  It's all either mailing lists 
>> or
>> someone sending out to their list of contacts.  That gets spam, but not
>> that much.
>>
>> The third is the one I gave my sister, and there's a trickle of real 
>> email
>> there.  But, the spam is amazing.  Not only lots of it, but I swear it's
>> related to my sister's use of gmail, since there is a lot of dog and
>> health related stuff.  Almost relevant, but I sure didn't ask for it.
>>
>> So I suspect gmail is more careful with accounts that get used regularly,
>> but that's speculation.
>>
>>    Michael
>
> One could take it that the NSA reads your mail, automatically.
> I hope I am too small a fish for them to be interested in.
> I gmailed my son that I was having trouble with an uncontrolled dog.
> Next visit to gmail, I had ads for pet kennels, etc.

Can't say I have ever got that result myself and a couple
of individuals to use one of my gmail addresses for most
of my communications with them, very often about
specific problems they are having like you uncontrolled dog.

I don’t use the gmail web mail much at all tho, normally
use a just one email client on the PC and their app on
the phone and tablet.

I do use google very extensively indeed for both my
primary search engine and google maps, and don’t
get any ads at all from them in either of those.

The main place I do see ads which are clearly the
result of some recent google activity is in facebook.
Not very intrusive at all.

I wwould hope its
> just an automaatic search for special terms, (Kinda like Eliza)
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#157427

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
Message-ID<20160123202443.c59065008fea1a05cd82852f@eircom.net>
In reply to#157405
On 23 Jan 2016 16:49:17 GMT
mausg@mail.com wrote:

> One could take it that the NSA reads your mail, automatically. 
> I hope I am too small a fish for them to be interested in.
> I gmailed my son that I was having trouble with an uncontrolled dog.
> Next visit to gmail, I had ads for pet kennels, etc. I wwould hope its
> just an automaatic search for special terms, (Kinda like Eliza) 

	Essentially yes it is a sophisticated version of that kind of
search, how sophisticated is only known to some Google employees. They
openly admit to processing your email for the purpose of targeting
advertising. If the NSA (or anyone else) wants to read my email they can
either catch it in flight (most of it at least appears to go direct from
the senders MTA to mine) or hack their way through my firewall, find my
mail server and hack their way into that - or send some gardae round with a
warrant. I'd like to think this is inconvenient enough that they won't be
reading it unless they think I'm of interest, if I really cared I'd encrypt
it.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers


csiph-web