Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #157427

Re: recommended free email?

From	Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: recommended free email?
Date	2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<20160123202443.c59065008fea1a05cd82852f@eircom.net> (permalink)
References	<4d02e0c0-31e6-4263-a4c1-a74e2682d4ec@googlegroups.com> <dgg531Fbnf9U1@mid.individual.net> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1601231053280.5652@darkstar.example.org> <slrnna7bo6.18i.mausg@smaus.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 23 Jan 2016 16:49:17 GMT
mausg@mail.com wrote:

> One could take it that the NSA reads your mail, automatically. 
> I hope I am too small a fish for them to be interested in.
> I gmailed my son that I was having trouble with an uncontrolled dog.
> Next visit to gmail, I had ads for pet kennels, etc. I wwould hope its
> just an automaatic search for special terms, (Kinda like Eliza) 

	Essentially yes it is a sophisticated version of that kind of
search, how sophisticated is only known to some Google employees. They
openly admit to processing your email for the purpose of targeting
advertising. If the NSA (or anyone else) wants to read my email they can
either catch it in flight (most of it at least appears to go direct from
the senders MTA to mine) or hack their way through my firewall, find my
mail server and hack their way into that - or send some gardae round with a
warrant. I'd like to think this is inconvenient enough that they won't be
reading it unless they think I'm of interest, if I really cared I'd encrypt
it.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN                                      | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

Thread

recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
  Re: recommended free email? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
  Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
        Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
  Re: recommended free email? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
    Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
      Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
    Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
      Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
        Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:34 +1100
      Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:00 -0600
        Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:22 -0600
          Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-28 11:46 -0500
            Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:36 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-31 11:03 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 17:29 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 09:25 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:31 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 13:54 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 14:58 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 15:35 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 16:04 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:42 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:39 -0500
      Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:43 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 10:56 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:27 +0000
            Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:53 -0600
            Re: recommended free email? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-25 08:22 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:25 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 13:32 +0100
            Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:21 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-25 14:18 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:54 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:56 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:10 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:32 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:15 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 10:33 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-06 20:20 +0300
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:50 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:06 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 16:13 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:32 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:20 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 15:45 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:24 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:11 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:42 +0000

csiph-web