Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #16843 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-02-06 12:15 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-02-06 11:08 -0700 |
| Articles | 18 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11
24H2 Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> - 2025-02-06 12:15 +0100
Re: 24H2 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-06 07:08 -0500
Re: 24H2 Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> - 2025-02-07 09:28 +0100
Re: 24H2 Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> - 2025-02-07 09:31 +0100
Re: 24H2 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-21 23:04 -0500
Re: 24H2 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-22 19:30 +0000
Re: 24H2 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-22 14:48 -0500
Re: 24H2 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-23 04:35 +0000
Re: 24H2 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-23 10:18 -0600
Re: 24H2 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-24 22:30 +0000
Re: 24H2 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-24 18:58 -0500
Re: 24H2 Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-06 09:10 -0500
Re: 24H2 ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 11:32 -0700
Re: 24H2 Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> - 2025-02-06 22:22 +0100
Re: 24H2 Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-06 17:17 -0500
Re: 24H2 sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-02-06 16:35 -0600
Re: 24H2 Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-06 09:25 -0800
Re: 24H2 ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-06 11:08 -0700
| From | Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 12:15 +0100 |
| Subject | 24H2 |
| Message-ID | <vo25k1$11dru$1@solani.org> |
windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to 23h2 how can I disable the update for good? -- /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=- ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 07:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vo28ne$2um5v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16843 |
On Thu, 2/6/2025 6:15 AM, Ammammata wrote:
> windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week
>
> after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to 23h2
>
> how can I disable the update for good?
>
https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm
Set it to "11" "23H2" and click the application button,
and that will prevent going past 23H2. I'm using that
right now on my Daily Driver.
What that does, is set around four registry entries to stop upgrades.
*******
I have a 24H2 on the machine across from me, and that is running quite OK.
There is also a 24H2 on the Test Machine, which is eleven years old
and has no TPM. With no MBEC support, it's just a bit slow. The video driver
is WDDM 3.2 version (NVidia 560).
[Picture]
https://i.postimg.cc/KcWTwqrZ/Test-Machine-runs-W11-24-H2.gif
Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-07 09:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vo4g7o$12pc1$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #16845 |
Paul wrote on 06/02/2025 : > I have a 24H2 on the machine across from me, and that is running quite OK. same here, it fails only on my Lenovo ThinkCentre :( -- /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=- ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-07 09:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vo4gdt$12pfe$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #16845 |
Paul explained on 06/02/2025 : > https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm > > Set it to "11" "23H2" and click the application button, > and that will prevent going past 23H2. I'm using that > right now on my Daily Driver. did it, now I keep fingers crossed Thank You -- /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=- ........... [ al lavoro ] ...........
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-21 23:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vtiirj9jfv9vci59mobkm5rjnrug1vq3gn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #16868 |
Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> wrote: >Paul explained on 06/02/2025 : >> https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm >> >> Set it to "11" "23H2" and click the application button, >> and that will prevent going past 23H2. I'm using that >> right now on my Daily Driver. > >did it, now I keep fingers crossed >Thank You Paul is a wonderful soul. You seem very cool, too. For the records. But I can't help but snark, here, that the solution is to revert to 23H2, because you said: "windows updated to 24h2 without my permission". M$ is worse than I'd even have thought, in your instance. If that's the trend - Linux is a more reliable platform. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-22 19:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvrk952.33fv6.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #17373 |
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 04:04 this Saturday (GMT): > Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> wrote: >>Paul explained on 06/02/2025 : > >>> https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm >>> >>> Set it to "11" "23H2" and click the application button, >>> and that will prevent going past 23H2. I'm using that >>> right now on my Daily Driver. >> >>did it, now I keep fingers crossed >>Thank You > > > Paul is a wonderful soul. You seem very cool, too. For the records. > > But I can't help but snark, here, that the solution is to revert to > 23H2, because you said: "windows updated to 24h2 without my > permission". M$ is worse than I'd even have thought, in your > instance. If that's the trend - Linux is a more reliable platform. Forced/Begging for updates has been a thing since the 8.1 days.. I remember all the ads and popups begging you to upgrade to W10, and that it was a "limited time oppritunity" and such. Of course, it's so much worse today. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-22 14:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sbakrj1mkg3c1i6rfsgi7nq7qs79ff49ch@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #17391 |
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: >Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 04:04 this Saturday (GMT): >> Ammammata <ammammata@tiscali.it> wrote: >>>Paul explained on 06/02/2025 : >> >>>> https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm >>>> >>>> Set it to "11" "23H2" and click the application button, >>>> and that will prevent going past 23H2. I'm using that >>>> right now on my Daily Driver. >>> >>>did it, now I keep fingers crossed >>>Thank You >> >> Paul is a wonderful soul. You seem very cool, too. For the records. >> >> But I can't help but snark, here, that the solution is to revert to >> 23H2, because you said: "windows updated to 24h2 without my >> permission". M$ is worse than I'd even have thought, in your >> instance. If that's the trend - Linux is a more reliable platform. > >Forced/Begging for updates has been a thing since the 8.1 days.. I >remember all the ads and popups begging you to upgrade to W10, and that >it was a "limited time oppritunity" and such. Of course, it's so much >worse today. Admittedly, though, they didn't lie about 10 being the last real version ever. Because a (previously upgraded) 7 key will install 11 on cutting edge hardware or a VM. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-23 04:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m1vmsoFmh5fU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17394 |
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:48:07 -0500, Joel wrote: > Admittedly, though, they didn't lie about 10 being the last real version > ever. Because a (previously upgraded) 7 key will install 11 on cutting > edge hardware or a VM. When I was on the Insiders channel they pushed out a 'Windows Next' update. It wouldn't install and they quickly reverted it. That was over a year ago and I haven't heard any more about a 'next' or 12. I think they're too busy chasing the AI unicorn through the fields of clover at the moment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-23 10:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sfimrj57fa45kb878mduqo84qorkre1nka@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #17419 |
rbowman wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>>
>> Admittedly, though, they didn't lie about 10 being the last real version
>> ever. Because a (previously upgraded) 7 key will install 11 on cutting
>> edge hardware or a VM.
>
>When I was on the Insiders channel they pushed out a 'Windows Next'
>update. It wouldn't install and they quickly reverted it. That was over a
>year ago and I haven't heard any more about a 'next' or 12.
>
>I think they're too busy chasing the AI unicorn through the fields of
>clover at the moment.
Well, what's better than to have an "AI" spy on their customers? It
must feel like they've died and gone to heaven.
--
How long has Linux been around?
About 15 years?
And Linux is free?
Linux must be defective.
- flathead
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-24 22:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvrpslr.11e10.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #17419 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote at 04:35 this Sunday (GMT): > On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:48:07 -0500, Joel wrote: > >> Admittedly, though, they didn't lie about 10 being the last real version >> ever. Because a (previously upgraded) 7 key will install 11 on cutting >> edge hardware or a VM. > > When I was on the Insiders channel they pushed out a 'Windows Next' > update. It wouldn't install and they quickly reverted it. That was over a > year ago and I haven't heard any more about a 'next' or 12. > > I think they're too busy chasing the AI unicorn through the fields of > clover at the moment. I honestly wouldn't be too suprised if MS started making Windows itself a subsciption that got continuously updated. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-24 18:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vpj13b$1gndp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #17453 |
On Mon, 2/24/2025 5:30 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote at 04:35 this Sunday (GMT): >> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:48:07 -0500, Joel wrote: >> >>> Admittedly, though, they didn't lie about 10 being the last real version >>> ever. Because a (previously upgraded) 7 key will install 11 on cutting >>> edge hardware or a VM. >> >> When I was on the Insiders channel they pushed out a 'Windows Next' >> update. It wouldn't install and they quickly reverted it. That was over a >> year ago and I haven't heard any more about a 'next' or 12. >> >> I think they're too busy chasing the AI unicorn through the fields of >> clover at the moment. > > > I honestly wouldn't be too suprised if MS started making Windows itself > a subsciption that got continuously updated. > Back in 2015, WaaS was posited as the endpoint for the ecosystem. It is now 2025, and we're still floating that balloon ? How long does it take to do frog boiling (a critter that does not escape a boiling pot if the temperature is raised gradually, instead it croaks rather than hop out) ? Let's find out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog Maybe they've figured out that the pot would be empty if they did that. Although it's true that some people will pay for almost anything shoved through their letterbox. ******* And you don't install just any old key on a VM. Microsoft Tech Support do not support maintenance issues for VM-linked keys. There is a specific product you're supposed to be buying, if wishing to license the OS while it runs in a VM. You can't just take the license key off the back of a cereal box and enter that -- the reason is, if the key is "lost", the Tech Support person will give their rendition of "tough Beanz". They won't do a thing for you. With the correct key (no idea what Enterprise product that would be), then you will get a better response from them. Someone here lost a key in a VM already, and they recount the response they got when trying to restore it. It's sufficient to modify some identifier used in the VM to upset the activation of the key -- making a VM "more brittle" than bricks&mortar real computers with their NIC MAC address and other hardware details. An example of a key, would be a "Retail SKU" where the price is double the normal OEM key, but you get the right to "move" the license from one machine to another. Such a key could be put on a VM where the identifier got modified by accident or abuse. The key when re-applied to the VM, would "look like it was being moved". Whereas the more normal OEM keys floating around, are unlikely to have that property (can't be moved). Paul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 09:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vo2fqf$2vu2k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16843 |
On 2/6/2025 6:15 AM, Ammammata wrote:
> windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week
>
> after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to
> 23h2
>
> how can I disable the update for good?
>
Download Windows Update Blocker. It disables the services
and then apparently locks the settings. (Since Win10, Windows
can re-enable some services if you disable them, while
pretending that it allows you to disable them. The Windows
update services are among them. Interestingly, if you disable
a critical service like RPC or Background Tasks Infrastructure,
Windows will happily fall on its sword rather than overriding
your choice or even warning you.)
I also recommend Simplewall. Free, easy, small. It uses the
Windows firewall API to provide a highly functional interface.
You can easily configure it to only allow approved programs
to go online. It also has special settings for Windows telemetry,
Update, and MS programs, under the Blocklist menu.
I'm afraid it's come to this. Microsoft increasingly lies about
what they're doing and what your options are. Though it's
not entirely new. They've always adopted a sneaky approach
of non-confrontational sleaze. My favorite example was in IE,
where the cookie settings required work to find. If you managed
to find them, the 3rd-party cookie settings were hidden behind
a button marked "Advanced". MS didn't fight about 3rd-party
cookies. They just ensured that 99.8% of people would never
even know about them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 11:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vo2v7s$32r2k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16850 |
Newyana2 wrote on 2/6/25 7:10 AM: > On 2/6/2025 6:15 AM, Ammammata wrote: >> windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week > > I'm afraid it's come to this. Microsoft increasingly lies about > what they're doing and what your options are. Though it's > not entirely new. Yes, not entirely new. Original notification on auto-update for 24H2(from 23H2 and 22H2) in consumer version(Pro, Home) in Insider program(Canary build, quite a few months ago). Most recent notice reiterated/updating Dec 2024 notice in Win11 24H2's January 2025 Known Issues. ...same as in the past for Win11 22H2 to 23H2, Win10 21H2 to 22H2(Oct 2022 notice). i.e. nothing new, standard, expected practice/deployment. -- ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 22:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lu9aqjlg6j1b80i1mmcvsh4cbib8rmjf20@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #16850 |
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:10:09 -0500, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote: >On 2/6/2025 6:15 AM, Ammammata wrote: >> windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week >> >> after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to >> 23h2 >> >> how can I disable the update for good? >> > > Download Windows Update Blocker. It disables the services >and then apparently locks the settings. He doesn't want to block updates entirely, he wants only to prevent major ones (23H2 -> 24H2). GRC tool seems better. -- Ci sono 10 tipi di persone al mondo: quelle che capiscono il sistema binario e quelle che non lo capiscono.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 17:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vo3cba$356j8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16857 |
On 2/6/2025 4:22 PM, Valerio Vanni wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:10:09 -0500, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> > wrote: > >> On 2/6/2025 6:15 AM, Ammammata wrote: >>> windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week >>> >>> after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to >>> 23h2 >>> >>> how can I disable the update for good? >>> >> >> Download Windows Update Blocker. It disables the services >> and then apparently locks the settings. > > He doesn't want to block updates entirely, he wants only to prevent > major ones (23H2 -> 24H2). > GRC tool seems better. > Maybe. If it works. I wonder. Microsoft is saying it's not your choice this time. I think that overall there isn't much choice but to either let MS control your device or block them out. But I suppose that if people want to try to keep getting security updates then they could make disk images of the version they want, then try to Registry setting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 16:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vo3dfp$2v9ou$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16858 |
On 2/6/2025 4:17 PM, Newyana2 wrote: >> >> He doesn't want to block updates entirely, he wants only to prevent >> major ones (23H2 -> 24H2). >> GRC tool seems better. >> > > Maybe. If it works. I wonder. Idjit. It works >Microsoft is saying it's not your > choice this time. BS > I think that overall there isn't much choice > but to either let MS control your device or block them out. > But I suppose that if people want to try to keep getting security > updates then they could make disk images of the version they > want, then try to Registry setting. Frightening world this guy lives in! -- Better Days Ahead! Darwanism Is Junk Science!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 09:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.420e907de91d0ff49903ae@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #16843 |
On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:15:12 +0100, Ammammata wrote: > > windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week > > after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back > to 23h2 > > how can I disable the update for good? https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm -- Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/ Shikata ga nai...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-06 11:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vo2tqd$32i4a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #16843 |
Ammammata wrote on 2/6/25 4:15 AM: > windows updated to 24h2 without my permission, last week > > after seven days fighting with malfunctioning issues, I reverted back to > 23h2 > > how can I disable the update for good? > <qp> Devices running Home and Pro editions of Windows 11, versions 23H2 and 22H2 that are not managed by IT departments will receive the update automatically. Users can choose the time to restart their device or postpone the update. </qp> cf. <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/status-windows-11-24h2> - see 4th paragraph in section titled 'Current status as of January 21, 2025 " Also see 'Pause updats in Windows 11' <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/pause-updates-in-windows-643e9ea7-3cf6-7da6-a25c-95d4f7f099fe> Other methods to 'pause': - 3rd party software or manual intervention - a variety of methods available via search(Google, Bing, Duck, Yahoo, etc.) -- ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.os.windows-11
csiph-web