Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #16291
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? |
| Date | 2025-01-14 15:06 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <vm622l.10to.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <vm19p8$1da3k$3@dont-email.me> <vm1eld.3vs.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vm1c6p$1da3k$5@dont-email.me> <vm3f8r.10es.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vm47tg$22spb$2@dont-email.me> |
T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 1/13/25 7:33 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote: > > T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 1/12/25 1:11 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote: > >>> Back to my original point: Why not let the customer use the software > >>> of the manufacturer of his camera? (That is normally free - as in 'no > >>> cost' - software.) > >> > >> 1) those softwares are typially s***. And he wanted a gallery > >> package > > > > IME, they're quite good and not 's***' by any stretch of the > > imagination. > > > > And they *are* "gallery package"s, or you must mean something > > completely different than what most people consider to be a "gallery > > package". > > > >> 2) he does not have access to it. The camera is old. > > > > You only need to know the brand. Unless the camera manufacturer got > > out of business, they'll probably have software which also works for > > old(er) cameras. > > > > What *is* the brand (of the camera)? > > > >> XP software > >> does not run so well in W11 anyway. > > > > Well, this very post is brought to you by XP software running on > > Windows 11. Works like a charm. > > > >> 3) there is no reason why the gallery programs should not work > >> seamlessly. Remember Picasa? It was seamless. > > > > Well, they either have or don't have PTP/MTP support. "seamless[ly]" > > has nothing to do with it. > > > If it works in Windows Explorer, there is not reason it > should not work in other programs as well. This is > just bad programming. Continued footstamping is not a valid argument. It has been explained multiple times *why* assuming that "it should work in other programs" is wrong. If you don't understand the explanation, ask questions, but don't repeat your incorrect argument over and over, after it already has been debunked serveral times. > Do you know of an alternative that does work? Yes, the software from camera manufacturers. But you reject that for no good reason and can't be bothered to respond nor to answer my question on the camera's brand. So remind us, exactly why again should we try to help you!?
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 23:17 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Hank Rogers <invalid@nospam.com> - 2025-01-12 08:50 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 01:38 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 03:12 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 11:36 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:42 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 22:34 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-13 09:53 -0700
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 15:32 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? mick <nospam@junk.mail> - 2025-01-12 13:16 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 13:34 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 14:31 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-12 21:34 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 19:58 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:16 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-12 08:29 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:43 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-12 08:56 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:48 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-12 16:31 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:47 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-12 21:11 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 13:28 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 15:33 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 15:34 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 16:17 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-13 19:32 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 16:45 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-14 15:06 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 16:08 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 13:25 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 07:04 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 13:31 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-12 22:30 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:01 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 15:34 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-13 13:54 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Tony <noreply@ghtyhgfrt.com> - 2025-01-13 00:26 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:04 -0800
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-13 00:54 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 16:07 +0000
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-13 14:05 -0500
Re: picture gallery programs that read cameras? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-13 20:31 +0000
csiph-web