Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #183611

Re: Scary AI

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: Scary AI
Date Sun, 13 Apr 2025 07:49:31 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 23
Message-ID <vtg8a9$2ran9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <vt3f7u$2eh7c$3@dont-email.me> <vt3jee$2krgp$1@dont-email.me> <vt3oli$2omc2$1@dont-email.me> <vt3qqt$2rfml$1@dont-email.me> <vt42j1$326a7$1@dont-email.me> <vt43ma$337e2$1@dont-email.me> <vt6j8n$1bam9$1@dont-email.me> <vt6mbn$1e7fe$1@dont-email.me> <vtb1jb$1ikm7$1@dont-email.me> <vtbjjr$26kj0$1@dont-email.me> <vtf7kh$1r22f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Sun, 13 Apr 2025 13:48:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info dont-email.me; posting-host="69d94a5664c3487a5cc6707de3f2c674"; logging-data="2992873"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FxhRvcWHilKGx8uS9+gorHCIcJ9E2ios="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1
Cancel-Lock sha1:A8EN9EKXNueNBMQr0gpY8x4NT0c=
Content-Language en-US
In-Reply-To <vtf7kh$1r22f$1@dont-email.me>
Xref csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-10:183611

Show key headers only | View raw

On 4/12/2025 10:30 PM, Chris wrote:

>This is the beauty and strength of the
> scientific method. It is objective.

   Yes. You've highlighted the crux of my point in a
nutshell. It assumes an empirically discoverable object
and a neutral subject. Within that limited context,
and only within that context, science is very useful.

    The subject can only be neutral, and the object can
only be truly defined, within the confines of a paradigm
assumed to be absolute truth.

   In any case, I can see that you're not able to see past
the epistemological dogmas of Scientism, and the luxurious
allure of certainty. It's those dogmas that make people think
AI is intelligent. It's fear of uncertainty that reduces
discussion to bickering and accusations.

   But I thought I'd just throw this out there and see if
it rings any bells for anyone. I wasn't really thinking that
it would in a tech forum.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 16:26 +0100
  Re: Scary AI "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-08 11:45 -0400
  Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 12:39 -0400
    Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 19:07 +0100
      Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 14:45 -0400
        Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 20:35 +0100
          Re: Scary AI jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-04-09 14:01 -0500
        Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:57 +0000
          Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 17:16 -0400
            Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 19:53 +0000
              Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-09 16:47 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 12:23 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-11 13:31 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:30 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-13 07:49 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 13:08 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:38 +0000
            Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:40 +0300
              Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-17 20:22 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-18 02:12 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:44 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2025-04-18 14:34 +0300
      Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:46 +0000
        Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 22:48 +0100
          Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:50 +0000
    Re: Scary AI occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-04-18 16:45 +0200
  Re: Scary AI Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-04-09 05:29 +0200
  Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:02 +0300

csiph-web