Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #250865 > unrolled thread

[OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

Back to article view | Back to alt.comp.freeware

Contents

  [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:28 +0000
    Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:42 +0000
      Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 07:50 -0800
        Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:58 +0000
          Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:03 -0800
            Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:16 +0000
              Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:21 -0800
                Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:24 +0000
                  Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:40 -0800
                    Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:49 +0000
        Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 00:04 +0800
    Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:08 -0500
      Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 09:28 -0800
        Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:29 -0500
          Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 11:29 -0800
            Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 14:36 -0500
              Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 12:07 -0800

#250865 — [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

Apparently, our "friends" , the ones who worship royalty and don't believe in dentistry or palatable food, are
at it again.


"Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’"

"Apple is formally opposing a proposed UK law that requires tech companies to provide a way for authorities to
access encrypted messages. The software giant has prided itself on communications so secure that not even it
can read some messages. Under so-called “end-to-end encryption,” only sender and receiver have the capacity to
unscramble a message.

But British leaders, including Prime Minister David Cameron, argue that ultra-tight encryption prevents
intelligence agencies from tracking down terrorists. “Do we want to allow a means of communication between
people which we cannot read?” he asked earlier this year.

In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple claimed that there is no such thing as a
message that can be read by the government, but not by malicious hackers.

“The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any process that weakens the mathematical
models that protect user data will by extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.

Apple is doubly worried that the UK law would apply globally (what they call “extra-territoriality”). Britain
wants companies to comply with search warrants, whether they are based domestically or abroad.

This could set a dangerous precedent, whereby any state actor, including China or Russia, could demand the
same access to user data. While Britain may have noble intentions, authoritarian regimes may want to spy on
Apple’s vast user base for other, less-liberal reasons.

Finally, the bill could cause all kinds of complications from overlapping and contradicting rules. In the
ever-shifting landscape of privacy laws, one country may consider a British spy warrant “hacking,” and Apple
would be forbidden by law to confirm whether they had to give authorities access to the data.

A growing industry of startups are based on difficult-to-crack encryption (designed especially to prevent
government spying). This would put startups in a very difficult situation.

The British government will take up the bill next year."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/23/apple-fears-britains-snoopers-charter/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#250866

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
wrote:

>In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple claimed that there is no such thing as a
>message that can be read by the government, but not by malicious hackers.

>“The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any process that weakens the mathematical
>models that protect user data will by extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.

What a heap of crap. 

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250868 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple claimed 
>> that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by the government, 
>> but not by malicious hackers.
>
>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will by 
>> extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>
> What a heap of crap. 
>

A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
expressed by Apple was quite enviable.

Your bad teeth and poor diet must be affecting your mind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250869

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

>p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple claimed 
>>> that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by the government, 
>>> but not by malicious hackers.
>>
>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will by 
>>> extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>
>> What a heap of crap. 
>>
>
>A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>expressed by Apple was quite enviable.

What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.

>Your bad teeth and poor diet must be affecting your mind.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250872 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by the 
>>>> government,  but not by malicious hackers.
>>> 
>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will 
>>>> by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>> 
>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>> 
>> 
>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>
> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>

And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
assertion to be "crap".  Try to stay on topic Jessalyn.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250875

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

>After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by the 
>>>>> government,  but not by malicious hackers.
>>>> 
>>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will 
>>>>> by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>>> 
>>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>>
>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>>
>
>And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
>assertion to be "crap". 

No, I'm not. 

> Try to stay on topic Jessalyn.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250878 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

p-0''0-h the cat (ES) explained :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by 
>>>>>> the  government,  but not by malicious hackers. 
>>>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>>>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will 
>>>>>> by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>>> 
>>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
>>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
>>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>>> 
>> 
>> And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
>> assertion to be "crap". 
>
> No, I'm not. 
>

Great come-back!  ROTFLMAO!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250879

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:21:19 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

>p-0''0-h the cat (ES) explained :
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by 
>>>>>>> the  government,  but not by malicious hackers. 
>>>>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>>>>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will 
>>>>>>> by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>>>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>>>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>>>> 
>>>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
>>>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
>>>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
>>> assertion to be "crap". 
>>
>> No, I'm not. 
>>
>
>Great come-back!  ROTFLMAO!

Thank you. I'm going to patent my ideas. Obviously if you can't do it
I'm really onto something.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250882 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

p-0''0-h the cat (ES) expressed precisely :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:21:19 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) explained :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>>>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by 
>>>>>>>> the  government,  but not by malicious hackers. 
>>>>>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. 
>>>>>>>> Any  process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user 
>>>>>>>> data will  by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a 
>>>>>>>> filing.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>>>>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>>>>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
>>>>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
>>>>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
>>>> assertion to be "crap". 
>>> 
>>> No, I'm not. 
>>> 
>> 
>> Great come-back!  ROTFLMAO!
>
> Thank you. I'm going to patent my ideas. Obviously if you can't do it
> I'm really onto something.
>

Jessalyn, you are regular Thomas Edison, let me know how that patent 
application works out for you!

ROTFLAMO!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250884

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:40:07 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

>p-0''0-h the cat (ES) expressed precisely :
>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:21:19 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) explained :
>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>>>>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by 
>>>>>>>>> the  government,  but not by malicious hackers. 
>>>>>>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. 
>>>>>>>>> Any  process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user 
>>>>>>>>> data will  by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a 
>>>>>>>>> filing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>>>>>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>>>>>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
>>>>>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
>>>>>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
>>>>> assertion to be "crap". 
>>>> 
>>>> No, I'm not. 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Great come-back!  ROTFLMAO!
>>
>> Thank you. I'm going to patent my ideas. Obviously if you can't do it
>> I'm really onto something.
>>
>
>Jessalyn, you are regular Thomas Edison, let me know how that patent 
>application works out for you!
>
>ROTFLAMO!

none, I'm still working on the brain transplant for you. Stay off the E
numbers. You've only got one chance at this. You don't want to end up
like Nicodemus, and stop all that rolling on the floor, you'll catch
something which will probably be smarter than you. 

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250873 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

On 12/23/2015 11:50 PM, none wrote:
> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth
> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position
> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>
> Your bad teeth and poor diet must be affecting your mind.

 From the way you wrote, none, were you a literature student?

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.2.7-300.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   23:48:01 up 1 day 5:31 0 users load average: 0.00 0.01 0.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250887 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:

> Apparently, our "friends" , the ones who worship royalty and don't
> believe in dentistry or palatable food, are at it again.
> 
> 
> "Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’"
> 
> "Apple is formally opposing a proposed UK law that requires tech
> companies to provide a way for authorities to access encrypted
> messages. The software giant has prided itself on communications so
> secure that not even it can read some messages. Under so-called
> “end-to-end encryption,” only sender and receiver have the capacity
> to unscramble a message.
> 
> But British leaders, including Prime Minister David Cameron, argue
> that ultra-tight encryption prevents intelligence agencies from
> tracking down terrorists. “Do we want to allow a means of
> communication between people which we cannot read?” he asked earlier
> this year.
> 
> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple
> claimed that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by
> the government, but not by malicious hackers.
> 
> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics.
> Any process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user
> data will by extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a
> filing.
> 
> Apple is doubly worried that the UK law would apply globally (what
> they call “extra-territoriality”). Britain wants companies to comply
> with search warrants, whether they are based domestically or abroad.
> 
> This could set a dangerous precedent, whereby any state actor,
> including China or Russia, could demand the same access to user data.
> While Britain may have noble intentions, authoritarian regimes may
> want to spy on Apple’s vast user base for other, less-liberal reasons.
> 
> Finally, the bill could cause all kinds of complications from
> overlapping and contradicting rules. In the ever-shifting landscape
> of privacy laws, one country may consider a British spy warrant
> “hacking,” and Apple would be forbidden by law to confirm whether
> they had to give authorities access to the data.
> 
> A growing industry of startups are based on difficult-to-crack
> encryption (designed especially to prevent government spying). This
> would put startups in a very difficult situation.
> 
> The British government will take up the bill next year."
> 
> http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/23/apple-fears-britains-snoopers-charter/

Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
give you your weekly fuck?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250888 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter?

burfordTjustice presented the following explanation :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
> Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
>

> Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
> give you your weekly fuck?

Oh good, buuuuuurfooooord, the inbred, racist coward with the Oedipus 
complex has returned for another whoopin'!  It is remarkable what will 
conjure you out from under your bridge.

Did you get down to the Children of Siblings Charities for your 
Christmas blanket and new shoes?  If not, jump on that stolen bicycle 
and pedal down there right away!  When you return, there will be a 
brand new, empty, cardboard box from a refrigerator for you to sleep in 
tonight......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250889 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter?

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:28:10 -0800
none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

> burfordTjustice presented the following explanation :
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
> > Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
> >
> 
> > Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
> > give you your weekly fuck?
> 
> Oh good, buuuuuurfooooord, the inbred, racist coward with the Oedipus 
> complex has returned for another whoopin'!  It is remarkable what
> will conjure you out from under your bridge.
> 
> Did you get down to the Children of Siblings Charities for your 
> Christmas blanket and new shoes?  If not, jump on that stolen bicycle 
> and pedal down there right away!  When you return, there will be a 
> brand new, empty, cardboard box from a refrigerator for you to sleep
> in tonight......

LOL You are so weak..no wonder pooh owns you....LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250897 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter?

burfordTjustice wrote :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:28:10 -0800
> none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> burfordTjustice presented the following explanation :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
>>> Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
>>> give you your weekly fuck?
>> 
>> Oh good, buuuuuurfooooord, the inbred, racist coward with the Oedipus 
>> complex has returned for another whoopin'!  It is remarkable what
>> will conjure you out from under your bridge.
>> 
>> Did you get down to the Children of Siblings Charities for your 
>> Christmas blanket and new shoes?  If not, jump on that stolen bicycle 
>> and pedal down there right away!  When you return, there will be a 
>> brand new, empty, cardboard box from a refrigerator for you to sleep
>> in tonight......
>
> LOL You are so weak..no wonder pooh owns you....LOL

Well, you are somewhat unidimensional, once we explore your racism, 
ignorance, mental illnesses and trolling, there just isn't much left to 
work with.

At least Jessalyn makes an effort to joust, you simply crumble and run 
away like most cowardly trolls.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250898 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter?

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:29:48 -0800
none <none@none.invalid> wrote:

> burfordTjustice wrote :
> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:28:10 -0800
> > none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> burfordTjustice presented the following explanation :
> >>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
> >>> Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
> >>> 
> >> 
> >>> Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
> >>> give you your weekly fuck?
> >> 
> >> Oh good, buuuuuurfooooord, the inbred, racist coward with the
> >> Oedipus complex has returned for another whoopin'!  It is
> >> remarkable what will conjure you out from under your bridge.
> >> 
> >> Did you get down to the Children of Siblings Charities for your 
> >> Christmas blanket and new shoes?  If not, jump on that stolen
> >> bicycle and pedal down there right away!  When you return, there
> >> will be a brand new, empty, cardboard box from a refrigerator for
> >> you to sleep in tonight......
> >
> > LOL You are so weak..no wonder pooh owns you....LOL
> 
> Well, you are somewhat unidimensional, once we explore your racism, 
> ignorance, mental illnesses and trolling, there just isn't much left
> to work with.
> 
> At least Jessalyn makes an effort to joust, you simply crumble and
> run away like most cowardly trolls.

Actually we get bored with you cause you are pathetically weak....LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#250901 — Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter?

burfordTjustice formulated the question :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:29:48 -0800
> none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> burfordTjustice wrote :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:28:10 -0800
>>> none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> burfordTjustice presented the following explanation :
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000
>>>>> Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum
>>>>> give you your weekly fuck?
>>>> 
>>>> Oh good, buuuuuurfooooord, the inbred, racist coward with the
>>>> Oedipus complex has returned for another whoopin'!  It is
>>>> remarkable what will conjure you out from under your bridge.
>>>> 
>>>> Did you get down to the Children of Siblings Charities for your 
>>>> Christmas blanket and new shoes?  If not, jump on that stolen
>>>> bicycle and pedal down there right away!  When you return, there
>>>> will be a brand new, empty, cardboard box from a refrigerator for
>>>> you to sleep in tonight......
>>> 
>>> LOL You are so weak..no wonder pooh owns you....LOL
>> 
>> Well, you are somewhat unidimensional, once we explore your racism, 
>> ignorance, mental illnesses and trolling, there just isn't much left
>> to work with.
>> 
>> At least Jessalyn makes an effort to joust, you simply crumble and
>> run away like most cowardly trolls.
>
> Actually we get bored with you cause you are pathetically weak....LOL

"We"?  Are you speaking of yourself and all of the other voices in your 
head?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.comp.freeware

csiph-web