Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #250882
| From | none <none@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware |
| Subject | Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ |
| Date | 2015-12-23 08:40 -0800 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <mn.ba087dfc274a1bd5.136606@none.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <8sgl7b964s9psvdjlu3juq8fg49eqogcr8@4ax.com> <mn.b9e37dfcab1b4eeb.136606@none.invalid> <l6il7bh48pl6d6g20gtvhrjn3dolld16fh@4ax.com> <mn.b9f57dfc32a64bce.136606@none.invalid> <sjil7bl4g86hsh85948h1g80gir1fq594q@4ax.com> |
p-0''0-h the cat (ES) expressed precisely : > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:21:19 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote: > >> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) explained : >>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:03:20 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote : >>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended : >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In its formal response to Britains Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple >>>>>>>> claimed that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by >>>>>>>> the government, but not by malicious hackers. >>>>>>>> The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. >>>>>>>> Any process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user >>>>>>>> data will by extension weaken the protection, Apple wrote in a >>>>>>>> filing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What a heap of crap. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn. The width and breadth >>>>>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position >>>>>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable. >>>>> >>>>> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I >>>>> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways >>>>> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ. >>>>> >>>> >>>> And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's >>>> assertion to be "crap". >>> >>> No, I'm not. >>> >> >> Great come-back! ROTFLMAO! > > Thank you. I'm going to patent my ideas. Obviously if you can't do it > I'm really onto something. > Jessalyn, you are regular Thomas Edison, let me know how that patent application works out for you! ROTFLAMO!
Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:28 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:42 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 07:50 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:58 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:03 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:16 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:21 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:24 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:40 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:49 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 00:04 +0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 09:28 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:29 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 11:29 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 12:07 -0800
csiph-web