Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #250872

Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’

Show all headers | View raw

After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:50:41 -0800, none <none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> p-0''0-h the cat (ES) pretended :
>>> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000, Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple 
>>>> claimed  that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by the 
>>>> government,  but not by malicious hackers.
>>> 
>>>> “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. Any 
>>>> process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user data will 
>>>> by  extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a filing.
>>> 
>>> What a heap of crap. 
>>> 
>> 
>> A very cogent and convincing argument Jessalyn.  The width and breadth 
>> of technical knowledge you demonstrated in refuting the position 
>> expressed by Apple was quite enviable.
>
> What's up none, don't you know how to do it. Be careful, Dusty said I
> couldn't hide processes from a NMAP scanner, and I thought of two ways
> within a second. Ha Ha. Get yourself an education and an IQ.
>

And yet, you are incapable of explaining why you consider Apple's 
assertion to be "crap".  Try to stay on topic Jessalyn.

Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:28 +0000
  Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:42 +0000
    Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 07:50 -0800
      Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:58 +0000
        Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:03 -0800
          Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:16 +0000
            Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:21 -0800
              Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:24 +0000
                Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:40 -0800
                Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:49 +0000
      Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 00:04 +0800
  Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:08 -0500
    Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 09:28 -0800
      Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:29 -0500
        Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 11:29 -0800
          Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 14:36 -0500
            Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 12:07 -0800

csiph-web