Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #250887
| From | burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware |
| Subject | Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ |
| Date | 2015-12-23 12:08 -0500 |
| Organization | At Her Service |
| Message-ID | <20151223120849.0000647e@buh.boh> (permalink) |
| References | <u0fl7b5t82ptkmt739dsrsvm5kj2d1v6i3@4ax.com> |
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:28:45 +0000 Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote: > Apparently, our "friends" , the ones who worship royalty and don't > believe in dentistry or palatable food, are at it again. > > > "Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’" > > "Apple is formally opposing a proposed UK law that requires tech > companies to provide a way for authorities to access encrypted > messages. The software giant has prided itself on communications so > secure that not even it can read some messages. Under so-called > “end-to-end encryption,” only sender and receiver have the capacity > to unscramble a message. > > But British leaders, including Prime Minister David Cameron, argue > that ultra-tight encryption prevents intelligence agencies from > tracking down terrorists. “Do we want to allow a means of > communication between people which we cannot read?” he asked earlier > this year. > > In its formal response to Britain’s Investigatory Powers Bill, Apple > claimed that there is no such thing as a message that can be read by > the government, but not by malicious hackers. > > “The best minds in the world cannot rewrite the laws of mathematics. > Any process that weakens the mathematical models that protect user > data will by extension weaken the protection,” Apple wrote in a > filing. > > Apple is doubly worried that the UK law would apply globally (what > they call “extra-territoriality”). Britain wants companies to comply > with search warrants, whether they are based domestically or abroad. > > This could set a dangerous precedent, whereby any state actor, > including China or Russia, could demand the same access to user data. > While Britain may have noble intentions, authoritarian regimes may > want to spy on Apple’s vast user base for other, less-liberal reasons. > > Finally, the bill could cause all kinds of complications from > overlapping and contradicting rules. In the ever-shifting landscape > of privacy laws, one country may consider a British spy warrant > “hacking,” and Apple would be forbidden by law to confirm whether > they had to give authorities access to the data. > > A growing industry of startups are based on difficult-to-crack > encryption (designed especially to prevent government spying). This > would put startups in a very difficult situation. > > The British government will take up the bill next year." > > http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/23/apple-fears-britains-snoopers-charter/ Rookie fucking NYM shifter....did not your mum give you your weekly fuck?
Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:28 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:42 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 07:50 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 15:58 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:03 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:16 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:21 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:24 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 08:40 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britains Snoopers Charter "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2015-12-23 16:49 +0000
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 00:04 +0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain’s ‘Snooper’s Charter’ burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 09:28 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 12:29 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 11:29 -0800
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@buh.boh> - 2015-12-23 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] - Why Apple Fears Britain?s ?Snooper?s Charter? none <none@none.invalid> - 2015-12-23 12:07 -0800
csiph-web