Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #55171 > unrolled thread

PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora

Started by"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
First post2016-02-05 10:40 -0500
Last post2016-02-07 12:30 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 56 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate


Contents

  PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 10:40 -0500
    Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-05 16:23 +0000
      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 11:51 -0500
      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 09:54 -0800
    Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 09:52 -0800
      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 17:29 -0500
        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-05 22:41 +0000
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 15:31 -0800
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 18:51 -0500
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-06 00:04 +0000
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 16:18 -0800
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 19:22 -0500
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-06 00:37 +0000
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:58 -0600
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 16:16 -0800
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 19:24 -0500
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 16:32 -0800
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-06 00:41 +0000
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:56 -0700
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 20:04 -0600
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:31 -0600
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:23 -0600
        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:54 -0800
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 16:04 -0700
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 15:32 -0800
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 18:20 -0500
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 15:57 -0800
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:36 -0600
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:58 -0500
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-05 19:04 -0500
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:55 -0700
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 20:04 -0600
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:38 -0600
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:37 -0600
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:29 -0600
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:24 -0600
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-06 15:59 -0500
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-07 12:05 +0000
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-07 14:25 -0600
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-07 15:44 -0500
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 12:49 -0800
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 14:32 -0700
                    Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-07 16:38 -0500
                      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 14:51 -0700
                  Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-07 19:42 -0600
                    Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-08 18:09 -0500
                      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 16:53 -0800
                        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-08 20:08 -0600
                        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 23:40 -0500
        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-05 19:22 -0600
      Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:45 +0100
        Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:09 -0700
          Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:47 -0800
            Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:13 +0100
              Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:27 -0700
                Re: PING: Checkmate and his Main Slurp, Pandora snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-07 12:30 +0000

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#55230

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:31 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndWqSNl40SjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55206
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:31:49 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <1mi64c0.jwo0b45opfejN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
>>         
>> [...]
>>         
>> > It's a good thing the good religious individual didn't press charges.
>> > I would have.
>>         
>> Is that the theist way?
>>         
>>         
> What happened to turning the other cheek?

It fell into his poop bucket.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55227

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:23 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndmqSNlk1yjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55200
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:41:32 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
>         
> [...]
>         
>> It's a good thing the good religious individual didn't press charges.
>> I would have.
>         
> Is that the theist way?

Apparently in his addled mind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55201

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-05 14:54 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.311ec80afadc494e98c54e@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#55199
In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>, 
> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> >> 
> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
> >> doing so is a FELONY!
> >> 
> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
> >> 
> >> About trespass and solicitation:
> >> 
> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners 
> >> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors 
> >> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about 
> >> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their 
> >> 
> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate 
> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you 
> >> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of 
> >> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency 
> >> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions. 
> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often 
> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
> >> 
> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front 
> >> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits 
> >> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for 
> >> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors 
> >> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you 
> >> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation 
> >> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit 
> >> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is 
> >> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
> >> 
> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
> >> 
> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing 
> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of 
> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's 
> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
> >> 
> >> - See more at:
> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
> >> 
> >> 
> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
> >
> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone 
> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very clear 
> >that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude enough 
> >to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve, and 
> >usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get 
> >belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear 
> >spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
> >
> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a 'talk' 
> >with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no stranger 
> >to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if he 
> >stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited months, 
> >then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car, then 
> >ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in 
> >case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a 
> >picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me when he 
> >sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece of a 
> >brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in 
> >his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
> >
> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me now, 
> >and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on him 
> >that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it, too.  
> >He's already offered.
> >
> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your 
> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy, 
> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
> 
> 
> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.

I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.


> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two 
> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
> now.
> 
> Sheesh!
> 
> 
> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
> deadly force. 
> 
> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.

I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete.  
Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, and new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55204

From"%" <persent@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-05 16:04 -0700
Message-ID<94vvau.8jj.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#55201
Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>>>
>>>> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
>>>> doing so is a FELONY!
>>>>
>>>> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>>>
>>>> About trespass and solicitation:
>>>>
>>>> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners
>>>> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors
>>>> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about
>>>> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>>>
>>>> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>>> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you
>>>> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of
>>>> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency
>>>> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
>>>> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
>>>> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>>>>
>>>> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front
>>>> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits
>>>> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for
>>>> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors
>>>> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you
>>>> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation
>>>> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit
>>>> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is
>>>> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
>>>>
>>>> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>>>
>>>> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>>> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
>>>> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
>>>> possessory rights in [real] property."
>>>>
>>>> - See more at:
>>>> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>>
>>> You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>> with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>>> clear
>>> that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude
>>> enough
>>> to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve,
>>> and
>>> usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get
>>> belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear
>>> spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
>>>
>>> I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>>> 'talk'
>>> with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
>>> stranger
>>> to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if
>>> he
>>> stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited
>>> months,
>>> then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car,
>>> then
>>> ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in
>>> case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a
>>> picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me
>>> when he
>>> sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece
>>> of a
>>> brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's
>>> in
>>> his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>>>
>>> Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>>> now,
>>> and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on
>>> him
>>> that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it,
>>> too.
>>> He's already offered.
>>>
>>> What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>> permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>> you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>
>>
>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
>> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
>> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
>> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.
>
> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>
>
>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two
>> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
>> now.
>>
>> Sheesh!
>>
>>
>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
>> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
>> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
>> deadly force.
>>
>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
>> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
>> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.
>
> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a
> machete.
> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.

pandora borden 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55207

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-05 15:32 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.311ed0f2f9ce237f98c55c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#55204
In article <94vvau.8jj.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...


> 
> Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> > In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
> > greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> >> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >>> In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
> >>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> >>>>
> >>>> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
> >>>> doing so is a FELONY!
> >>>>
> >>>> Read on, you stupid morons!
> >>>>
> >>>> About trespass and solicitation:
> >>>>
> >>>> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners
> >>>> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors
> >>>> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about
> >>>> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their
> >>>>
> >>>> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
> >>>> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you
> >>>> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of
> >>>> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency
> >>>> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
> >>>> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
> >>>> regulated by city or county ordinances.
> >>>>
> >>>> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front
> >>>> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits
> >>>> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for
> >>>> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors
> >>>> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you
> >>>> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation
> >>>> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit
> >>>> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is
> >>>> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
> >>>>
> >>>> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
> >>>>
> >>>> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
> >>>> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
> >>>> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
> >>>> possessory rights in [real] property."
> >>>>
> >>>> - See more at:
> >>>> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
> >>>
> >>> You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
> >>> with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
> >>> clear
> >>> that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude
> >>> enough
> >>> to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve,
> >>> and
> >>> usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get
> >>> belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear
> >>> spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
> >>>
> >>> I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
> >>> 'talk'
> >>> with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
> >>> stranger
> >>> to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if
> >>> he
> >>> stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited
> >>> months,
> >>> then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car,
> >>> then
> >>> ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in
> >>> case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a
> >>> picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me
> >>> when he
> >>> sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece
> >>> of a
> >>> brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's
> >>> in
> >>> his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
> >>>
> >>> Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
> >>> now,
> >>> and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on
> >>> him
> >>> that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it,
> >>> too.
> >>> He's already offered.
> >>>
> >>> What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
> >>> permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
> >>> you'd probably help drag him on board.
> >>
> >>
> >> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
> >> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
> >> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
> >> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.
> >
> > I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
> >
> >
> >> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two
> >> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
> >> now.
> >>
> >> Sheesh!
> >>
> >>
> >> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
> >> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
> >> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
> >> deadly force.
> >>
> >> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
> >> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
> >> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.
> >
> > I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a
> > machete.
> > Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
> 
> pandora borden 

Emmett Bobbit.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, and new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55205

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-05 18:20 -0500
Message-ID<25babbl58r17rndvptckm5ue8rcbqi85oj@4ax.com>
In reply to#55201
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>, 
>greghall@yacht_master.fake says... 
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>, 
>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>> >> 
>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
>> >> doing so is a FELONY!
>> >> 
>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>> >> 
>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>> >> 
>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners 
>> >> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors 
>> >> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about 
>> >> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their 
>> >> 
>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate 
>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you 
>> >> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of 
>> >> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency 
>> >> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions. 
>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often 
>> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>> >> 
>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front 
>> >> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits 
>> >> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for 
>> >> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors 
>> >> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you 
>> >> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation 
>> >> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit 
>> >> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is 
>> >> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
>> >> 
>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>> >> 
>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing 
>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of 
>> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's 
>> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
>> >> 
>> >> - See more at:
>> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>> >> 
>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>> >
>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone 
>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very clear 
>> >that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude enough 
>> >to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve, and 
>> >usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get 
>> >belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear 
>> >spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
>> >
>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a 'talk' 
>> >with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no stranger 
>> >to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if he 
>> >stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited months, 
>> >then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car, then 
>> >ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in 
>> >case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a 
>> >picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me when he 
>> >sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece of a 
>> >brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in 
>> >his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>> >
>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me now, 
>> >and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on him 
>> >that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it, too.  
>> >He's already offered.
>> >
>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your 
>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy, 
>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>> 
>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
>> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
>> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
>> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.
>
>I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.

But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and
supporting her illegal machete brandishing actions. 
That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.

>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two 
>> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
>> now.
>> 
>> Sheesh!
>> 
>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
>> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
>> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
>> deadly force. 
>> 
>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
>> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
>> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.
>
>I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete. 

Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." Do you think
she was trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it
was? No, she used it as a threat of bodily harm. That's called
assault with a deadly weapon. That's a felony.
 
>Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.

Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to
be assigned a legal definition.


-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55211

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-05 15:57 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.311ed6a97df7cafc98c563@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#55205
In article <25babbl58r17rndvptckm5ue8rcbqi85oj@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>, 
> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... 
> >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> >> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>, 
> >> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> >> >> 
> >> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
> >> >> doing so is a FELONY!
> >> >> 
> >> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
> >> >> 
> >> >> About trespass and solicitation:
> >> >> 
> >> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners 
> >> >> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors 
> >> >> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about 
> >> >> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their 
> >> >> 
> >> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate 
> >> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you 
> >> >> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of 
> >> >> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency 
> >> >> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions. 
> >> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often 
> >> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
> >> >> 
> >> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front 
> >> >> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits 
> >> >> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for 
> >> >> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors 
> >> >> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you 
> >> >> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation 
> >> >> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit 
> >> >> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is 
> >> >> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
> >> >> 
> >> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
> >> >> 
> >> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing 
> >> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of 
> >> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's 
> >> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
> >> >> 
> >> >> - See more at:
> >> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
> >> >> 
> >> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
> >> >
> >> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone 
> >> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very clear 
> >> >that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude enough 
> >> >to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve, and 
> >> >usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get 
> >> >belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear 
> >> >spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
> >> >
> >> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a 'talk' 
> >> >with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no stranger 
> >> >to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if he 
> >> >stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited months, 
> >> >then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car, then 
> >> >ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in 
> >> >case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a 
> >> >picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me when he 
> >> >sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece of a 
> >> >brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in 
> >> >his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
> >> >
> >> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me now, 
> >> >and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on him 
> >> >that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it, too.  
> >> >He's already offered.
> >> >
> >> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your 
> >> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy, 
> >> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
> >> 
> >> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
> >> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
> >> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
> >> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.
> >
> >I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
> 
> But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and
> supporting her illegal machete brandishing actions. 
> That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.

Joining a discussion is not tantamount to literally owning what anyone 
else in said discussion said, you groin-groping goofball.

 
> >> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two 
> >> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
> >> now.
> >> 
> >> Sheesh!
> >> 
> >> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
> >> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
> >> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
> >> deadly force. 
> >> 
> >> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
> >> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
> >> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.
> >
> >I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete. 
> 
> Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." Do you think
> she was trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it
> was? No, she used it as a threat of bodily harm. That's called
> assault with a deadly weapon. That's a felony.

Showing someone an object that could be used as a weapon isn't assault 
with a deadly weapon, Counselor.  Worst case, it might be construed as 
brandishing a weapon.  If the peddler was selling cutlery, she may have 
wanted to show him that she already had an adequate supply of her own.

  
> >Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
> 
> Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to
> be assigned a legal definition.

Comparing Emmett's penis with your own is a phallicly fallacious 
argument, Counselor.



-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, and new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55231

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:36 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndSqSNmT0yjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55211
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:57:02 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <25babbl58r17rndvptckm5ue8rcbqi85oj@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>> >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> >> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>> >> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is
>> >> >> a FELONY!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>> >> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>> >> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>> >> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>> >> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>> >> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>> >> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before
>> >> >> soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
>> >> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
>> >> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front
>> >> >> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits
>> >> >> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for "No
>> >> >> Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or
>> >> >> pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you can report the
>> >> >> solicitor to the police as being in violation of your city's
>> >> >> laws. However, if your city does not prohibit solicitors from
>> >> >> knocking on your door when such a sign is posted, all you can
>> >> >> really do is politely ask them to leave.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>> >> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
>> >> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
>> >> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> - See more at:
>> >> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-
soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>> >> >
>> >> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten
>> >> >anyone with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it
>> >> >very clear that they're trespassing on posted private property. 
>> >> >Anyone rude enough to ignore my posted rights as a property owner,
>> >> >does not deserve, and usually does not receive a polite response
>> >> >from me.  If they get belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.
>> >> > I keep a can of bear spray by the door, and if necessary, I
>> >> >wouldn't hesitate to use it.
>> >> >
>> >> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>> >> >'talk' with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and
>> >> >no stranger to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him
>> >> >arrested if he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little
>> >> >shit waited months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a
>> >> >nasty note on my car, then ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass
>> >> >coward!  I filed a report in case I had to crack his head at a
>> >> >later date, and the cops have a picture of the note on file.  Now,
>> >> >the little bitch waves at me when he sees me coming.  Oh, get this:
>> >> > The guy wrote the note on a piece of a brown paper bag, and burned
>> >> >the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in his late thirties, and
>> >> >acts like he's 13.
>> >> >
>> >> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>> >> >now, and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of
>> >> >guns on him that could knock that little fucker's head clean off. 
>> >> >He'd do it, too. He's already offered.
>> >> >
>> >> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>> >> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>> >> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>> >> 
>> >> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your
>> >> personal problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's
>> >> OK to threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved
>> >> you are wrong.
>> >
>> >I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>> 
>> But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and supporting her illegal
>> machete brandishing actions.
>> That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.
> 
> Joining a discussion is not tantamount to literally owning what anyone
> else in said discussion said, you groin-groping goofball.
> 
Indeed.  Especially when another poster has intentionally misconstrued 
what was said.

>> >> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>> >> should be used to getting over it by now.
>> >> 
>> >> Sheesh!
>> >> 
>> >> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your
>> >> front door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless
>> >> life you could defend yourself with deadly force.
>> >> 
>> >> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly
>> >> guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual
>> >> didn't press charges. I would have.
>> >
>> >I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a
>> >machete.
>> 
>> Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." Do you think she was
>> trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it was? No, she used it
>> as a threat of bodily harm. That's called assault with a deadly weapon.
>> That's a felony.
> 
> Showing someone an object that could be used as a weapon isn't assault
> with a deadly weapon, Counselor.  Worst case, it might be construed as
> brandishing a weapon.  If the peddler was selling cutlery, she may have
> wanted to show him that she already had an adequate supply of her own.

Never even brandished it.  Merely pointed it out to them hanging by the 
door.
 
> 
>> >Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
>> 
>> Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to be assigned a
>> legal definition.
> 
> Comparing Emmett's penis with your own is a phallicly fallacious
> argument, Counselor.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55212

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-02-05 18:58 -0500
Message-ID<op.ycdwvwxntm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#55205
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:20:12 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.  
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"  
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"  
>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> >>
>>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your
>>> >> doing so is a FELONY!
>>> >>
>>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>> >>
>>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>>> >>
>>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners
>>> >> are finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors
>>> >> knocking on their doors. But what exactly can you do about
>>> >> these bothersome visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>> >>
>>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you
>>> >> live. For example, many states regulate the solicitation of
>>> >> charities, requiring them to register with their state agency
>>> >> before soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
>>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
>>> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>>> >>
>>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front
>>> >> door or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits
>>> >> solicitors from knocking on your door. The same goes for
>>> >> "No Trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors
>>> >> notice or pay attention to the signs. In such a case, you
>>> >> can report the solicitor to the police as being in violation
>>> >> of your city's laws. However, if your city does not prohibit
>>> >> solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign is
>>> >> posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
>>> >>
>>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>> >>
>>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
>>> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
>>> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
>>> >>
>>> >> - See more at:
>>> >>  
>>> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>> >>
>>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>> >
>>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very  
>>> clear
>>> >that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude  
>>> enough
>>> >to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve, and
>>> >usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get
>>> >belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear
>>> >spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
>>> >
>>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a  
>>> 'talk'
>>> >with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no  
>>> stranger
>>> >to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if he
>>> >stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited months,
>>> >then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on my car,  
>>> then
>>> >ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in
>>> >case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a
>>> >picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me when  
>>> he
>>> >sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece of a
>>> >brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in
>>> >his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>>> >
>>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me  
>>> now,
>>> >and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on  
>>> him
>>> >that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it,  
>>> too.
>>> >He's already offered.
>>> >
>>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>>
>>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany
>>> of your personal problems. You and Pandora made the
>>> stupid claim that it's OK to threaten bodily harm
>>> to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are wrong.
>>
>> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>
> But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and
> supporting her illegal machete brandishing actions.
> That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.
>
>>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two
>>> are wrong, you should be used to getting over it by
>>> now.
>>>
>>> Sheesh!
>>>
>>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking
>>> in your front door and going inside. Then, if you feared
>>> for your worthless life you could defend yourself with
>>> deadly force.
>>>
>>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is
>>> clearly guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good
>>> religious individual didn't press charges. I would have.
>>
>> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete.
>
> Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." Do you think
> she was trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it
> was? No, she used it as a threat of bodily harm. That's called
> assault with a deadly weapon. That's a felony.

i guess we should assume that anybody who is open-carrying a firearm is  
threatening others with a weapon then?

>
>> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
>
> Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to
> be assigned a legal definition.
>
>


-- 

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.

"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55213

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-05 19:04 -0500
Message-ID<3tdabbdhi416pfvaolgpbfmb67ohobgkmb@4ax.com>
In reply to#55212
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:58:34 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked
up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

<...>

>i guess we should assume that anybody who is open-carrying a firearm is  
>threatening others with a weapon then?

Just because a passerby might see a weapon it does not follow
that there is any implied threat.

On the other hand, when a religious missionary knocks on the
door and some irrational and bigoted, old bitch yells at them
to get off her property while brandishing a machete, that IS 
an actual threat with a deadly weapon which is a felony. 

People may be and ARE arrested and charge regularly for such
violent behavior.


-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55223

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-05 17:55 -0700
Message-ID<63habb965lktn5jtefbmeb68s8t9kc69dp@4ax.com>
In reply to#55213
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:04:08 -0500, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

>On the other hand, when a religious missionary knocks on the
>door and some irrational and bigoted, old bitch yells at them
>to get off her property while brandishing a machete, that IS 
>an actual threat with a deadly weapon which is a felony. 
>
>People may be and ARE arrested and charge regularly for such
>violent behavior.


poof kookie

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55235

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 20:04 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndOqSNkPySjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55223
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:55:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:04:08 -0500, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
> 
>>On the other hand, when a religious missionary knocks on the door and
>>some irrational and bigoted, old bitch yells at them to get off her
>>property while brandishing a machete, that IS an actual threat with a
>>deadly weapon which is a felony.
>>
>>People may be and ARE arrested and charge regularly for such violent
>>behavior.
> 
> 
> poof kookie

He's as bad as Fakey with his delusions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55233

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:38 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndaqSNkO0yjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55213
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:04:08 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:58:34 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey),
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>>i guess we should assume that anybody who is open-carrying a firearm is
>>threatening others with a weapon then?
> 
> Just because a passerby might see a weapon it does not follow that there
> is any implied threat.
> 
> On the other hand, when a religious missionary knocks on the door and
> some irrational and bigoted, old bitch yells at them to get off her
> property while brandishing a machete, 

You are a liar as well as delusional.  

that IS an actual threat with a
> deadly weapon which is a felony.

Yes, it would be if it happened but it didn't.

> People may be and ARE arrested and charge regularly for such violent
> behavior.

As you should be for stalking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55232

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:37 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndeqSNnQ0yjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55212
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:58:34 -0500, \"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living
at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:20:12 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is
>>>> >> a FELONY!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>>>> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>>>> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>>>> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>>>> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>>>> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before
>>>> >> soliciting residents for charitable contributions. However,
>>>> >> businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often regulated by
>>>> >> city or county ordinances.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front door
>>>> >> or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits solicitors
>>>> >> from knocking on your door. The same goes for "No Trespassing"
>>>> >> signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or pay attention
>>>> >> to the signs. In such a case, you can report the solicitor to the
>>>> >> police as being in violation of your city's laws. However, if your
>>>> >> city does not prohibit solicitors from knocking on your door when
>>>> >> such a sign is posted, all you can really do is politely ask them
>>>> >> to leave.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
>>>> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
>>>> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
>>>> >>
>>>> >> - See more at:
>>>> >>  
>>>> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-
becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>>> >>
>>>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>>> >
>>>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>>>> clear
>>>> >that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone rude
>>>> enough
>>>> >to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not deserve,
>>>> >and usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If they get
>>>> >belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can of bear
>>>> >spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
>>>> >
>>>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>>>> 'talk'
>>>> >with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
>>>> stranger
>>>> >to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him arrested if
>>>> >he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit waited
>>>> >months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty note on
>>>> >my car,
>>>> then
>>>> >ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward!  I filed a report in
>>>> >case I had to crack his head at a later date, and the cops have a
>>>> >picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch waves at me when
>>>> he
>>>> >sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the note on a piece of
>>>> >a brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh!  Scary!  LOL! 
>>>> >Dude's in his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>>>> >
>>>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>>>> now,
>>>> >and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns on
>>>> him
>>>> >that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do it,
>>>> too.
>>>> >He's already offered.
>>>> >
>>>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>>>
>>>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your
>>>> personal problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's OK
>>>> to threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved you
>>>> are wrong.
>>>
>>> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>>
>> But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and supporting her illegal
>> machete brandishing actions.
>> That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.
>>
>>>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>>>> should be used to getting over it by now.
>>>>
>>>> Sheesh!
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your
>>>> front door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless
>>>> life you could defend yourself with deadly force.
>>>>
>>>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly
>>>> guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual
>>>> didn't press charges. I would have.
>>>
>>> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a
>>> machete.
>>
>> Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." Do you think she was
>> trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it was? No, she used it
>> as a threat of bodily harm. That's called assault with a deadly weapon.
>> That's a felony.
> 
> i guess we should assume that anybody who is open-carrying a firearm is
> threatening others with a weapon then?

Apparently.  I'll have to let all the hunters around here who carry them 
in sight in their pickemup trucks know this.
> 
>>> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
>>
>> Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to be assigned a
>> legal definition.
>>
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55229

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:29 -0600
Message-ID<s5ednduqSNn80SjLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55205
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:20:12 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>>greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> >> 
>>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is a
>>> >> FELONY!
>>> >> 
>>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>> >> 
>>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>>> >> 
>>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>>> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>>> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>>> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>> >> 
>>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>>> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>>> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before
>>> >> soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
>>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
>>> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>>> >> 
>>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front door
>>> >> or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits solicitors from
>>> >> knocking on your door. The same goes for "No Trespassing" signs.
>>> >> Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or pay attention to the
>>> >> signs. In such a case, you can report the solicitor to the police
>>> >> as being in violation of your city's laws. However, if your city
>>> >> does not prohibit solicitors from knocking on your door when such a
>>> >> sign is posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to
>>> >> leave.
>>> >> 
>>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>> >> 
>>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of one's
>>> >> land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's possessory
>>> >> rights in [real] property."
>>> >> 
>>> >> - See more at:
>>> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-
becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>> >> 
>>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>> >
>>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>>> >clear that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone
>>> >rude enough to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not
>>> >deserve, and usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If
>>> >they get belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can
>>> >of bear spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to
>>> >use it.
>>> >
>>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>>> >'talk' with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
>>> >stranger to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him
>>> >arrested if he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit
>>> >waited months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty
>>> >note on my car, then ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward! 
>>> >I filed a report in case I had to crack his head at a later date, and
>>> >the cops have a picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch
>>> >waves at me when he sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the
>>> >note on a piece of a brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh! 
>>> >Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>>> >
>>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>>> >now, and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns
>>> >on him that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do
>>> >it, too. He's already offered.
>>> >
>>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>> 
>>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your
>>> personal problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's OK
>>> to threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are
>>> wrong.
>>
>>I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
> 
> But you wasted no time jumping into the fray and supporting her illegal
> machete brandishing actions.
> That's tantamount to making that claim, you twit.

I never "brandished" anything.  

>>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>>> should be used to getting over it by now.
>>> 
>>> Sheesh!
>>> 
>>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your front
>>> door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless life you
>>> could defend yourself with deadly force.
>>> 
>>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly guilty
>>> of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual didn't
>>> press charges. I would have.
>>
>>I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete.
> 
> Here own words were, "I showed them a machete." 

It is hanging by my door.  No brandishing needed.

Do you think she was
> trying to sell it? Wanted comments on how sharp it was? No, she used it
> as a threat of bodily harm. That's called assault with a deadly weapon.
> That's a felony.

Nope, merely pointed it out to them.
  
>>Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
> 
> Threatening a dead weapon with a deadly weapon has yet to be assigned a
> legal definition.

You oughta know.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55228

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-05 19:24 -0600
Message-ID<s5edndiqSNnE1ijLnZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55201
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>> >> 
>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is a
>> >> FELONY!
>> >> 
>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>> >> 
>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>> >> 
>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>> >> 
>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before soliciting
>> >> residents for charitable contributions.
>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often regulated
>> >> by city or county ordinances.
>> >> 
>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front door
>> >> or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits solicitors from
>> >> knocking on your door. The same goes for "No Trespassing" signs.
>> >> Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or pay attention to the
>> >> signs. In such a case, you can report the solicitor to the police as
>> >> being in violation of your city's laws. However, if your city does
>> >> not prohibit solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign
>> >> is posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
>> >> 
>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>> >> 
>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of one's
>> >> land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's possessory
>> >> rights in [real] property."
>> >> 
>> >> - See more at:
>> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-
becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>> >
>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>> >clear that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone
>> >rude enough to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not
>> >deserve, and usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If
>> >they get belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can
>> >of bear spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to
>> >use it.
>> >
>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>> >'talk' with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
>> >stranger to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him
>> >arrested if he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit
>> >waited months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty
>> >note on my car, then ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward! 
>> >I filed a report in case I had to crack his head at a later date, and
>> >the cops have a picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch
>> >waves at me when he sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the
>> >note on a piece of a brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh! 
>> >Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>> >
>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>> >now, and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns
>> >on him that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do
>> >it, too. He's already offered.
>> >
>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>> 
>> 
>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your personal
>> problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's OK to
>> threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are
>> wrong.
> 
> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
> 
Neither did I.  It only happened in his addled mind.

>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>> should be used to getting over it by now.
>> 
>> Sheesh!
>> 
>> 
>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your front
>> door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless life you
>> could defend yourself with deadly force.
>> 
>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly guilty
>> of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual didn't
>> press charges. I would have.
> 
> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete.
> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.

I never threatened anyone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55250

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-06 15:59 -0500
Message-ID<2kncbb1dspkmr985dppgmj0l8a0sd1p9ug@4ax.com>
In reply to#55228
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:24:41 -0600, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>> >> 
>>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is a
>>> >> FELONY!
>>> >> 
>>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>> >> 
>>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>>> >> 
>>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>>> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>>> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>>> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>> >> 
>>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>>> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>>> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before soliciting
>>> >> residents for charitable contributions.
>>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often regulated
>>> >> by city or county ordinances.
>>> >> 
>>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front door
>>> >> or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits solicitors from
>>> >> knocking on your door. The same goes for "No Trespassing" signs.
>>> >> Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or pay attention to the
>>> >> signs. In such a case, you can report the solicitor to the police as
>>> >> being in violation of your city's laws. However, if your city does
>>> >> not prohibit solicitors from knocking on your door when such a sign
>>> >> is posted, all you can really do is politely ask them to leave.
>>> >> 
>>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>> >> 
>>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of one's
>>> >> land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's possessory
>>> >> rights in [real] property."
>>> >> 
>>> >> - See more at:
>>> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-soliciting-
>becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
>door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>> >
>>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>>> >clear that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone
>>> >rude enough to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not
>>> >deserve, and usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If
>>> >they get belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can
>>> >of bear spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to
>>> >use it.
>>> >
>>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>>> >'talk' with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and no
>>> >stranger to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him
>>> >arrested if he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little shit
>>> >waited months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a nasty
>>> >note on my car, then ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass coward! 
>>> >I filed a report in case I had to crack his head at a later date, and
>>> >the cops have a picture of the note on file.  Now, the little bitch
>>> >waves at me when he sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The guy wrote the
>>> >note on a piece of a brown paper bag, and burned the edges!  Oooh! 
>>> >Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in his late thirties, and acts like he's 13.
>>> >
>>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>>> >now, and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of guns
>>> >on him that could knock that little fucker's head clean off.  He'd do
>>> >it, too. He's already offered.
>>> >
>>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your personal
>>> problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's OK to
>>> threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved you are
>>> wrong.
>> 
>> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>> 
>Neither did I.  It only happened in his addled mind.
>
>>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>>> should be used to getting over it by now.
>>> 
>>> Sheesh!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your front
>>> door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless life you
>>> could defend yourself with deadly force.
>>> 
>>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly guilty
>>> of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual didn't
>>> press charges. I would have.
>> 
>> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a machete.
>> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
>
>I never threatened anyone.

WOW, oh WOW! There's a backpedal worthy of a broken chain.

LOL.

-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55262

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2)
Date2016-02-07 12:05 +0000
Message-ID<1mi9056.1beeyh1gvyvszN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#55250
Gergles <greghall@fake.yacht_master> wrote:
        
[...]
        
> a backpedal worthy of a broken chain.
> 
> LOL.
>
        
Darn, it, two minds with but a single thought. I feel dirty now.
        
lul
        
 
-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>   (valid)

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55274

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-07 14:25 -0600
Message-ID<xKydnXu5iofPNSrLnZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#55250
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:59:42 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:24:41 -0600, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:54:36 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
>>> In article <ra8abb9lrg21k28avb47o2b6fonam9evns@4ax.com>,
>>> greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>>> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:52:44 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
>>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>>>> >In article <s9g9bbpbk8ee7mnc3qu6v9v2rhob4sbu13@4ax.com>,
>>>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says...
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> You cannot threaten solicitors with a machete as your doing so is
>>>> >> a FELONY!
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> Read on, you stupid morons!
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> About trespass and solicitation:
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> "From bible toters to door-to-door salespeople, homeowners are
>>>> >> finding themselves increasingly annoyed by solicitors knocking on
>>>> >> their doors. But what exactly can you do about these bothersome
>>>> >> visits? Are the solicitors within their
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> "While there are a variety of laws in place that regulate
>>>> >> soliciting, the regulations can vary depending on where you live.
>>>> >> For example, many states regulate the solicitation of charities,
>>>> >> requiring them to register with their state agency before
>>>> >> soliciting residents for charitable contributions.
>>>> >> However, businesses and door-to-door salespeople are often
>>>> >> regulated by city or county ordinances.
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> "In some cities, posting a "No Soliciting" sign on your front door
>>>> >> or near the entrance to your neighborhood prohibits solicitors
>>>> >> from knocking on your door. The same goes for "No Trespassing"
>>>> >> signs. Unfortunately, not all solicitors notice or pay attention
>>>> >> to the signs. In such a case, you can report the solicitor to the
>>>> >> police as being in violation of your city's laws. However, if your
>>>> >> city does not prohibit solicitors from knocking on your door when
>>>> >> such a sign is posted, all you can really do is politely ask them
>>>> >> to leave.
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> (YOU MAY NOT THREATEN THEM WITH DEADLY FORCE - MY COMMENT)
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> "Whether or not a solicitor is considered guilty of trespassing
>>>> >> depends on the situation. In terms of a crime, trespassing of
>>>> >> one's land is defined as the "wrongful interference with one's
>>>> >> possessory rights in [real] property."
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> - See more at:
>>>> >> http://www.globalsecurityexperts.com/home-security/when-
soliciting-
>>becomes-trespassing-that-annoying-knock-on-the-
>>door.html#sthash.q36qxghe.dpuf
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!
>>>> >
>>>> >You need to pull your head out of your ass.  I don't threaten anyone
>>>> >with bodily harm.  I ask, or tell them to leave, and make it very
>>>> >clear that they're trespassing on posted private property.  Anyone
>>>> >rude enough to ignore my posted rights as a property owner, does not
>>>> >deserve, and usually does not receive a polite response from me.  If
>>>> >they get belligerent or threaten me, all bets are off.  I keep a can
>>>> >of bear spray by the door, and if necessary, I wouldn't hesitate to
>>>> >use it.
>>>> >
>>>> >I've only had one nasty neighbor threaten to "come up and have a
>>>> >'talk' with me" a few years ago.  The guy's a fucking hothead, and
>>>> >no stranger to the cops or the local jail.  I told him I'd have him
>>>> >arrested if he stepped foot on my property.  The cowardly little
>>>> >shit waited months, then snuck up under cover of darkness, left a
>>>> >nasty note on my car, then ran away.  Fucking big-mouthed punk-ass
>>>> >coward! I filed a report in case I had to crack his head at a later
>>>> >date, and the cops have a picture of the note on file.  Now, the
>>>> >little bitch waves at me when he sees me coming.  Oh, get this:  The
>>>> >guy wrote the note on a piece of a brown paper bag, and burned the
>>>> >edges!  Oooh! Scary!  LOL!  Dude's in his late thirties, and acts
>>>> >like he's 13.
>>>> >
>>>> >Of course it also helps that my son is usually here working for me
>>>> >now, and he's a big guy.  Does amateur boxing, and has a pair of
>>>> >guns on him that could knock that little fucker's head clean off. 
>>>> >He'd do it, too. He's already offered.
>>>> >
>>>> >What would you do if someone tried to board your boat without your
>>>> >permission?  Maybe that's a bad question for you.  If it was a guy,
>>>> >you'd probably help drag him on board.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Listen up, Tinkerbell. I am not interested in a litany of your
>>>> personal problems. You and Pandora made the stupid claim that it's OK
>>>> to threaten bodily harm to solicitors with a machete. I proved you
>>>> are wrong.
>>> 
>>> I didn't make that claim, you Nattering NetNiNNy.
>>> 
>>Neither did I.  It only happened in his addled mind.
>>
>>>> Get the fuck over it, already. As often as you two are wrong, you
>>>> should be used to getting over it by now.
>>>> 
>>>> Sheesh!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> P.S. Boarding a vessel is tantamount to breaking kicking in your
>>>> front door and going inside. Then, if you feared for your worthless
>>>> life you could defend yourself with deadly force.
>>>> 
>>>> Pandora, who threatened a missionary with a machete, is clearly
>>>> guilty of a felony. It's a good thing the good religious individual
>>>> didn't press charges. I would have.
>>> 
>>> I somehow doubt that Pandora actually threatened anyone with a
>>> machete.
>>> Emmett threatened his penis with a knife, and look where HE is.
>>
>>I never threatened anyone.
> 
> WOW, oh WOW! There's a backpedal worthy of a broken chain.
> 
> LOL.

No backpedal, merely your own intentional misdirection as usual.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#55275

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-07 15:44 -0500
Message-ID<t1bfbbhd8b1ktm06n3n6vrkpl40e18uh4j@4ax.com>
In reply to#55274
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:25:54 -0600, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:59:42 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:24:41 -0600, pandora <pandora@peak.org> wrote:

<...>

>>>I never threatened anyone.
>> 
>> WOW, oh WOW! There's a backpedal worthy of a broken chain.
>> 
>> LOL.
>
>No backpedal, merely your own intentional misdirection as usual.

Hush!  I tend to stick to the straight and narrow.  I prefer
to deal in facts. Can I help it if you live in Fantasy Land?

-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web