Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #282167 > unrolled thread

GRAVITY...

Back to article view | Back to alt.astronomy

Contents

  GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 13:27 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 12:01 -0700
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:47 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-16 14:03 -0700
      Re: GRAVITY... "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-02-16 17:42 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:58 -0700
          Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 17:13 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 08:39 -0700
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                  Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                    Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 16:57 -0800
                            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 18:59 -0700
                      Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
                        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-19 19:58 -0700
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 14:47 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 08:42 -0700
                Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0800
                  Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:38 -0700
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:45 -0800
                  Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:42 -0700
        Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 13:04 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:49 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#282229

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> 
>    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>    therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.


You have no evidence that gravity exist.


I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?


: an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory



I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??


or


Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?



Ja or nien?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282233

On 2/17/16 5:12 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> or
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>

   Gravitation is a fundamental force described mathematically by Sir
   Isaac Newton's Law of Gravitation.

   Einstein's theory of gravitation (general relativity) is even more
   accurate than Newton's and supported by countless experiments and
   observations, including GNSS 24/7.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282241 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory


(most of these science guys never read a dictionary)

To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.

The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.

Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.

In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.


Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.


Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.


They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.


In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.


The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.













The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282242 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>>>
>>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>>>     therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>>>     into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
>>
>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>>
>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>>
>> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>
>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>>
>> or
>>
>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>>
>> Ja or nien?
>
>
> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>
>
> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
>
> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
>
> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
>
> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
>
>
> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
>
>
> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
>
>
> In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.

Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever 
took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd 
science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we 
invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in 
gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back 
to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.

The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does 
not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to 
say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created 
a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are 
measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO 
explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
It's pure description.

Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with 
increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for 
the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an 
explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.

Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or 
what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law 
that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter 
what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282251 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

benj wrote:
> On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>>>>
>>>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity
>>>> exists. You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>>>>     therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using
>>>>     hydrogen into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>>
>>>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in
>>>> question.
>>>
>>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>>>
>>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>>>
>>>> an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is
>>>> not known or proven to be true
>>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>>
>>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>>>
>>> Ja or nien?
>>
>>
>> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be
>> true. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>
>>
>> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
>>
>> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>>
>> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory
>> means; is not known or proven to be true. The theory of Gravity is not 
>> known or proven to be true.
>>
>> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
>>
>> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
>>
>>
>> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
>>
>>
>> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
>>
>>
>> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word
>> theory, as if it makes it more true... but it doesn't matter whose
>> theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be
>> true.  In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been
>> proven to be true. The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows 
>> what gravity
>> is...or if it really exist.
>
> Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever
> took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd
> science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we
> invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in
> gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back
> to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.
>
> The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does
> not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to
> say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created
> a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are
> measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO
> explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
> It's pure description.
>
> Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with
> increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for
> the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an
> explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.
>
> Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or
> what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law
> that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter
> what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.






How can you argue with logic like that ?
BTW,....wind doesn't exist either, because you can't see it, or put it in a 
box. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282252 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

benj wrote:
> 
> On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >>>
> >>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >>>     therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >>>     into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >>>
> >>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> >>
> >> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> >>
> >> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> >>
> >> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> >>
> >> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> >>
> >> Ja or nien?
> >
> >
> > Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> >
> >
> > (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
> >
> > To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> > In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
> >
> >
> > Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
> >
> >
> > They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> > but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
> >
> >
> > The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.
> 
> Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever
> took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd
> science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we
> invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in
> gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back
> to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.


Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity
 is true or exist..
all it proves that people fall down.

You can problably come up with a million alternative explanations why things fall down.

I'm not intersted in arguments or explanations for why things fall down...



It reads here: "an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory


You don't like the definition...tough.


The theory of evolution....not proven to be true.



But who in the 'scientific community' is concerned about...truth???




> 
> The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does
> not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to
> say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created
> a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are
> measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO
> explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
> It's pure description.
> 
> Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with
> increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for
> the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an
> explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.
> 
> Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or
> what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law
> that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter
> what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282256 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> proves that people fall down.


   What force causes them to fall down?

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282265 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > proves that people fall down.
> 
>    What force causes them to fall down?
> 


I don't care to speculate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282266 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
>>> proves that people fall down.
>>
>>     What force causes them to fall down?
>>
>
>
> I don't care to speculate.
>

   No problem, the rest of us know.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282270 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> >>> proves that people fall down.
> >>
> >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't care to speculate.
> >
> 
>    No problem, the rest of us know.
> 


The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.


Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...



I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282271 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 4:29:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> > 
> > On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > >>> proves that people fall down.
> > >>
> > >>     What force causes them to fall down?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't care to speculate.
> > >
> > 
> >    No problem, the rest of us know.
> > 
> 
> 
> The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.
> 
> 
> Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...
> 
> 
> 
> I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.

r u drunk, do you know how to write comprehensible Engwiiiiiish, well do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282273 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

IT'S OBVIOUS THAT YOU DON'T, ARCieLYINGFRAUDSHITHEAD!

GIVE YOUR DEGREE BACK TO BEZERKLY, IDIOT!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:57:52 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 4:29:14 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > 
>> > On 2/18/16 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
>> > >>> proves that people fall down.
>> > >>
>> > >>     What force causes them to fall down?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I don't care to speculate.
>> > >
>> > 
>> >    No problem, the rest of us know.
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> The rest of yous know 'What force causes them to fall down' is not known, and has not proven to be true.
>> 
>> 
>> Unless you can point to a link that states unequivocally that the theory of gravity has been proven to be true...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I'll accept user-edited websites like wiki.
>
>r u drunk, do you know how to write comprehensible Engwiiiiiish, well do you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282289 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
> > > proves that people fall down.
> >
> >    What force causes them to fall down?
> >
> 
> I don't care to speculate.



but i do suspect the Sun is doing all the leg work...is there
electricity inside the sun?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282306 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

THE SUN IS A PLASMA, YOU IDIOT!

LOOK IT UP, IF YOU HAVE ONE BRAIN CELL WORKING!

Saul Levy


On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:06:07 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2/18/16 1:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > Jumping off a roof does not prove gravity is true or exist.. all it
>> > > proves that people fall down.
>> >
>> >    What force causes them to fall down?
>> >
>> 
>> I don't care to speculate.
>
>
>
>but i do suspect the Sun is doing all the leg work...is there
>electricity inside the sun?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282269 — Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 11:54:03 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > Sam Wormley wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> > >
> > >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> > >
> > >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> > >
> > >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> > >    therefore, gravity exists.
> > >
> > >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> > >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> > >
> > >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> > 
> > You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> > 
> > I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> > 
> > : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> > 
> > I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> > 
> > Ja or nien?
> 
> 
> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> 
> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
> 
> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
> 
> 
> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
> 
> 
> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
> 
> 
> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
> 
> 
> In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
> 
> 
> The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
a theory is a working postulate. Same thing said but more academic and curt. 

FUCK off with your 6 grade dictionary intellect? 

Can we get usenet classes for levels of intelligence. so we do not see you again?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282311

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >
> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >
> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> 
> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> 
> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> 
> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> 
> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> 
> or
> 
> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> 
> Ja or nien?


Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...

the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.


Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.


Are there aliens on other planets? No.


Is there water on Mars? No.


Are we alone. Yes.


Is there a God?


You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...



Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282313

YOU STUPID SCHMUCK, YOU STILL KNOW NOTHING ABOUT EVERYTHING!

HOW CAN YOU REMAIN SO FUCKING STUPID?

Saul Levy


On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:24:13 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>> >
>> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >
>> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >
>> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>> >    therefore, gravity exists.
>> >
>> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >
>> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
>> 
>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>> 
>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>> 
>> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>> 
>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>> 
>> Ja or nien?
>
>
>Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...
>
>the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.
>
>
>Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
>
>
>Are there aliens on other planets? No.
>
>
>Is there water on Mars? No.
>
>
>Are we alone. Yes.
>
>
>Is there a God?
>
>
>You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...
>
>
>
>Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282322

On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 7:42:47 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote:
> YOU STUPID SCHMUCK, YOU STILL KNOW NOTHING ABOUT EVERYTHING!
> 
> HOW CAN YOU REMAIN SO FUCKING STUPID?
> 
> Saul Levy
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:24:13 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >> 
> >> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> >> >
> >> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> >> >
> >> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> >> >
> >> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
> >> >    therefore, gravity exists.
> >> >
> >> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
> >> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> >> >
> >> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
> >> 
> >> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
> >> 
> >> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
> >> 
> >> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
> >> 
> >> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
> >> 
> >> or
> >> 
> >> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
> >> 
> >> Ja or nien?
> >
> >
> >Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...
> >
> >the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.
> >
> >
> >Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
> >
> >
> >Are there aliens on other planets? No.
> >
> >
> >Is there water on Mars? No.
> >
> >
> >Are we alone. Yes.
> >
> >
> >Is there a God?
> >
> >
> >You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...
> >
> >
> >
> >Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.

wow, starmaker so many troll handles. Fucking troll. Just because you were born stupid is not my concern. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282327

EXCEPT FOR BEING ANOTHER FUCKING STUPID IDIOT, ARCieFAGGOT!

Saul Levy


On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:46:37 -0800 (PST), Arc Michael
<abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 7:42:47 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote:
>> YOU STUPID SCHMUCK, YOU STILL KNOW NOTHING ABOUT EVERYTHING!
>> 
>> HOW CAN YOU REMAIN SO FUCKING STUPID?
>> 
>> Saul Levy
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:24:13 -0800, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>> >> >
>> >> >    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >> >
>> >> >    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >> >
>> >> >    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>> >> >    therefore, gravity exists.
>> >> >
>> >> >    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>> >> >    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>> >> >
>> >> >    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
>> >> 
>> >> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>> >> 
>> >> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>> >> 
>> >> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
>> >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>> >> 
>> >> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>> >> 
>> >> or
>> >> 
>> >> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>> >> 
>> >> Ja or nien?
>> >
>> >
>> >Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because...
>> >
>> >the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer.
>> >
>> >
>> >Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
>> >
>> >
>> >Are there aliens on other planets? No.
>> >
>> >
>> >Is there water on Mars? No.
>> >
>> >
>> >Are we alone. Yes.
>> >
>> >
>> >Is there a God?
>> >
>> >
>> >You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
>
>wow, starmaker so many troll handles. Fucking troll. Just because you were born stupid is not my concern.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#282318

On 2/20/16 1:24 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory?



   Gravitation is a fundamental force described mathematically by Sir
   Isaac Newton's Law of Gravitation.

   Einstein's theory of gravitation (general relativity) is even more
   accurate than Newton's and supported by countless experiments and
   observations, including GNSS 24/7.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.astronomy

csiph-web