Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #282311
| Message-ID | <56C8149D.47A6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: GRAVITY... |
| References | <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > Sam Wormley wrote: > > > > On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist > > > > You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut, > > therefore, gravity exists. > > > > You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen > > into helium, therefore, gravity exists. > > > > The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question. > > You have no evidence that gravity exist. > > I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory? > > : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory > > I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No?? > > or > > Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir? > > Ja or nien? Sam Wormley could not answer the question "is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??" because... the truth can be answered with either a Yes or No answer. Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer. Are there aliens on other planets? No. Is there water on Mars? No. Are we alone. Yes. Is there a God? You might not know the answer but it's either yes or no... Any question in the universe can be answered with a Yes or No answer.
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 13:27 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 12:01 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:47 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-16 14:03 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-02-16 17:42 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:58 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 17:13 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 08:39 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 16:57 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 18:59 -0700
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-19 19:58 -0700
Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 14:47 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 08:42 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:38 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:45 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:42 -0700
Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
Re: GRAVITY... mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 13:04 -0800
Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:49 -0700
csiph-web