Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #282229

Re: GRAVITY...

Message-ID <56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: GRAVITY...
References <56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> 
>    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>    therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.


You have no evidence that gravity exist.


I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?


: an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory



I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??


or


Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?



Ja or nien?

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 13:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 12:01 -0700
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:47 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-16 14:03 -0700
    Re: GRAVITY... "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-02-16 17:42 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:58 -0700
        Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 17:13 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 08:39 -0700
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 16:57 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-18 18:59 -0700
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-19 19:58 -0700
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 14:47 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 08:42 -0700
              Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:38 -0700
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-20 13:45 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-20 16:42 -0700
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-02-18 13:04 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-17 11:49 -0700

csiph-web