Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #433478

Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 02/18/2016 02:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
>>>
>>>     You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>>>     therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>>>     into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
>>>
>>>     The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.
>>
>> You have no evidence that gravity exist.
>>
>> I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?
>>
>> : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>>
>> I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??
>>
>> or
>>
>> Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?
>>
>> Ja or nien?
>
>
> Just so everyone knows...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
>
>
> (most of these science guys never read a dictionary)
>
> To be clear...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> It doesn't make a difference if it's a Einstein theory...a theory means; is not known or proven to be true.
>
> The theory of Gravity is not known or proven to be true.
>
> Gravity waves, is not known or proven to be true.
>
> In other words...The theory of Gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> Anybody tells you different, is lying to you.
>
>
> Why they lie? I don't know...maybe they're not in touch with reality.
>
>
> They'll try to fool you by putting an Einstein name next to the word theory, as if it makes it more true...
> but it doesn't matter whose theory it is...if it is a theory, it is not known or proven to be true.
>
>
> In other words Einstein theory of gravitation/gravity has not been proven to be true.
>
>
> The truth is, I don't even think anybody really knows what gravity is...or if it really exist.

Starfaker you are the reason Libs flunk every science course they ever 
took. Gravity obviously exists. Unlike you fantasy Lib arts crowd 
science is based on measurements and observations not fantasy. So we 
invite you (as we have invited HVAC who also does not believe in 
gravity) to step off the roof of a multi-story building and report back 
to us the results of your gravity-existence experiment.

The fine point is that one knows what has been measured. But that does 
not "explain" anything. People like PBS and "professor" Wormley like to 
say that Newton explained gravity. No such thing is true. Newton created 
a law that works pretty well to predict what gravitational forces are 
measured and what quantities regulate those forces. There is NO 
explanation of any mechanism or reason why gravity works as it does.
It's pure description.

Einstein improved those predictive laws to cover some more cases with 
increased accuracy, but again there is no "explanation" or mechanism for 
the effect provided. The so-called 'warping" of space-time is not an 
explanation but pure mathematical bullshit.

Nobody (at least in the unclassified world) knows what gravity is or 
what the mechanism behind it is. That is truth. Being able to have a law 
that describes the action of gravity is not an explanation no matter 
what Wormley, Boinker, and HVAC say.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
      Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800

csiph-web