Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #279526

Re: "picture" it

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > For some reason..
> > > it appears to me
> > > that the
> > > 'scientific community'
> > > don't understand..
> > > or don't know
> > > how to use other tools
> > > to understand
> > > how the universe works.
> > >
> > > They seem to be
> > > limited by using
> > > just mathematics.
> > >
> > > There are other tools.
> > >
> > > I'll explain what came before
> > > or existed before the big bang
> > > and what cause of the big bang clearly.
> > >
> > > The Bang Bang was simply
> > > an explosion of...
> > > 'MORE Space'.
> > >
> > > Before the big bang
> > > the small space that
> > > existed before was filled
> > > with stars to a point that
> > > if you looked at the night
> > > sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > from each other.
> > >
> > > There was simply more stars
> > > that filled the night sky that you
> > > could barely see the night sky.
> > >
> > > Trillion of years of stars being
> > > born and barely dying...
> > > an over population of stars
> > > in a small amount of space led
> > > to the explosion of the creation of
> > > MORE space.
> > >
> > > It also created a continue expansion of
> > > more space, black holes to control
> > > star population, shorter life span
> > > of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > >
> > > So, without using mathematics...
> > > you just simply..
> > > "picture" it.
> > >
> > > You think in terms of a
> > > photograph.
> > >
> > > Picture..a night sky
> > > with so many stars
> > > so close to each other
> > > you can barely can see
> > > the night dark black sky.
> > >
> > > Like a crowded Japanese train.
> > > http://tx.english-ch.com/teacher/art/japan_subway_10.jpg
> > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SrCwqs7cYR4/UcUhrD8QqcI/AAAAAAAAAhU/gCnK9heE5q0/s1600/japan_subway_11.jpg
> > >
> > > But with stars.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > In other words..
> > you don't need math
> > or methods like
> > experiment and observation..
> > to know whay caused the big bang
> > and what existed before it..
> >
> > You just need to...'picture' it!
> >
> > You don't need to send
> > rockit ships or big binoculos
> > out to space...I mean really..
> > what is Hubble sending back but...
> > 'pictures'?
> >
> > You can 'picture it' yourself
> > without leaving the ground.
> >
> > It's very easy to 'know'
> > what caused the big bang
> > and what exited before it...
> > you 'picture it'.
> >
> > No math needed.
> >
> > No experiments or
> > observation required.
> >
> > I already gave you the answer to
> > what casued the big bang...
> >
> > > The Bang Bang was simply
> > > an explosion of...
> > > 'MORE Space'.
> > >
> > > Before the big bang
> > > the small space that
> > > existed before was filled
> > > with stars to a point that
> > > if you looked at the night
> > > sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > from each other.
> > >
> > > There was simply more stars
> > > that filled the night sky that you
> > > could barely see the night sky.
> > >
> > > Trillion of years of stars being
> > > born and barely dying...
> > > an over population of stars
> > > in a small amount of space led
> > > to the explosion of the creation of
> > > MORE space.
> > >
> > > It also created a continue expansion of
> > > more space, black holes to control
> > > star population, shorter life span
> > > of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> >
> > Just by picturing it.
> >
> > And you will not find any holes, or
> > any serious objections to it. Even it
> > fits perfectly well
> > with your math and
> > any experiments or observation.
> >
> > This is CORRECT.
> > > The Bang Bang was simply
> > > an explosion of...
> > > 'MORE Space'.
> > >
> > > Before the big bang
> > > the small space that
> > > existed before was filled
> > > with stars to a point that
> > > if you looked at the night
> > > sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > from each other.
> > >
> > > There was simply more stars
> > > that filled the night sky that you
> > > could barely see the night sky.
> > >
> > > Trillion of years of stars being
> > > born and barely dying...
> > > an over population of stars
> > > in a small amount of space led
> > > to the explosion of the creation of
> > > MORE space.
> > >
> > > It also created a continue expansion of
> > > more space, black holes to control
> > > star population, shorter life span
> > > of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> >
> > It cannot be refuted, it is accurate, correct and true.
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> I mean, if you want a complete picture of the universe...'picture it'.
> 
> All of yous
> who have seen Mars
> have probably seen..
> a picture of it.



In other words..
one just need to
'think in pictures' instead
of math.

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 13:05 -0800
  Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 15:11 -0600
    Re: "picture" it Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-27 22:22 +0100
  Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:58 -0800
      Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:33 -0500
      Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 17:02 -0800
        Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 19:59 -0600
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:32 -0500
      Re: "picture" it Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 06:43 -0700
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:49 -0800
          Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:12 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:19 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:22 -0800
              Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:33 -0600
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:14 -0800
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:00 -0800
            Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:31 -0600
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:15 -0800
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:21 -0800
              Re: "picture" it David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-01 09:19 -0600
      Re: "picture" it Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-11-28 09:13 -0700
        Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:53 -0500
  Re: "picture" it Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 11:24 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:35 -0800
      Re: "picture" it Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-29 10:41 -0700

csiph-web