Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #279530

Re: "picture" it

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Kevrob wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 7:49:08 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Chrysi Cat wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/28/2015 1:32 AM, benj wrote:
> > > > > On 11/28/2015 02:09 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> For some reason..
> > > > >>> it appears to me
> > > > >>> that the
> > > > >>> 'scientific community'
> > > > >>> don't understand..
> > > > >>> or don't know
> > > > >>> how to use other tools
> > > > >>> to understand
> > > > >>> how the universe works.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> They seem to be
> > > > >>> limited by using
> > > > >>> just mathematics.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There are other tools.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'll explain what came before
> > > > >>> or existed before the big bang
> > > > >>> and what cause of the big bang clearly.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > > >>> the small space that
> > > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > > >>> from each other.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > > >>> MORE space.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> So, without using mathematics...
> > > > >>> you just simply..
> > > > >>> "picture" it.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> You think in terms of a
> > > > >>> photograph.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Picture..a night sky
> > > > >>> with so many stars
> > > > >>> so close to each other
> > > > >>> you can barely can see
> > > > >>> the night dark black sky.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Like a crowded Japanese train.
> > > > >>> http://tx.english-ch.com/teacher/art/japan_subway_10.jpg
> > > > >>> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SrCwqs7cYR4/UcUhrD8QqcI/AAAAAAAAAhU/gCnK9heE5q0/s1600/japan_subway_11.jpg
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But with stars.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The Starmaker
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In other words..
> > > > >> you don't need math
> > > > >> or methods like
> > > > >> experiment and observation..
> > > > >> to know whay caused the big bang
> > > > >> and what existed before it..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You just need to...'picture' it!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You don't need to send
> > > > >> rockit ships or big binoculos
> > > > >> out to space...I mean really..
> > > > >> what is Hubble sending back but...
> > > > >> 'pictures'?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> You can 'picture it' yourself
> > > > >> without leaving the ground.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It's very easy to 'know'
> > > > >> what caused the big bang
> > > > >> and what exited before it...
> > > > >> you 'picture it'.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> No math needed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> No experiments or
> > > > >> observation required.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I already gave you the answer to
> > > > >> what casued the big bang...
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > > >>> the small space that
> > > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > > >>> from each other.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > > >>> MORE space.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Just by picturing it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> And you will not find any holes, or
> > > > >> any serious objections to it. Even it
> > > > >> fits perfectly well
> > > > >> with your math and
> > > > >> any experiments or observation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This is CORRECT.
> > > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > > >>> the small space that
> > > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > > >>> from each other.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > > >>> MORE space.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It cannot be refuted, it is accurate, correct and true.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The Starmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > Libs all think that fantasy is all anyone needs to "explain" life.
> > > > >
> > > > > Libs should NEVER be allowed to set ANY policy. Disaster from their
> > > > > total ignorance is sure to follow. So many examples of this it is beyond
> > > > > doubt.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Uh-uh, Ben. This guy's a theocrat who believes science, fiction and
> > > > especially _science fiction_ should be outlawed. That's reactionary, not
> > > > Commie.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So Chrysi Kat, you are saying Albert Einstein is a reactionary...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 5. He Loathed Science Fiction
> > >
> > > Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion of
> > > scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence from any
> > > type of science fiction.
> > > "I never think of the future. It comes soon enough." He also thought
> > > people who claimed to have seen flying saucers should keep it to
> > > themselves.
> > >
> > >
> > > http://justbesplendid.tumblr.com/post/241094568/facts-about-einstein
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > and he was a commie...if not the biggest commie in the world.
> >
> > A pinko, but not a red.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_views_of_Albert_Einstein
> >
> > He liked Bob Clampett's "Time For Beany," so he at least
> > liked a bit of whimsical fantasy.
> >
> > Kevin R
> 
> Over 1,400 pages of investigation by the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation, released recently under the Freedom of Information Act,
> into the background of Einstein revealed that he was was a member,
> sponsor, or affiliated with 34 communist fronts and served as honorary
> chairman for three communist organizations. The report has the baffling
> conclusion that Albert Einstein had more Communist affiliations than the
> Soviet dictator Josef Stalin!
> https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein/Albert%20Einstein%20Part%205%20of%2014


https://books.google.com/books?id=Ndl9OAeE8woC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+fbi+cities+that+einstein+was+affiliated+with+thirty-four+communist&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiA0qKWi7XJAhVTLIgKHUoGD7gQ6AEINDAB#v=onepage&q&f=false

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 13:05 -0800
  Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 15:11 -0600
    Re: "picture" it Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-27 22:22 +0100
  Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:58 -0800
      Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:33 -0500
      Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 17:02 -0800
        Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 19:59 -0600
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:32 -0500
      Re: "picture" it Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 06:43 -0700
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:49 -0800
          Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:12 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:19 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:22 -0800
              Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:33 -0600
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:14 -0800
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:00 -0800
            Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:31 -0600
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:15 -0800
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:21 -0800
              Re: "picture" it David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-01 09:19 -0600
      Re: "picture" it Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-11-28 09:13 -0700
        Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:53 -0500
  Re: "picture" it Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 11:24 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:35 -0800
      Re: "picture" it Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-29 10:41 -0700

csiph-web