Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #279529

Re: "picture" it

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Kevrob wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 7:49:08 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Chrysi Cat wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/28/2015 1:32 AM, benj wrote:
> > > > On 11/28/2015 02:09 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For some reason..
> > > >>> it appears to me
> > > >>> that the
> > > >>> 'scientific community'
> > > >>> don't understand..
> > > >>> or don't know
> > > >>> how to use other tools
> > > >>> to understand
> > > >>> how the universe works.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> They seem to be
> > > >>> limited by using
> > > >>> just mathematics.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There are other tools.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll explain what came before
> > > >>> or existed before the big bang
> > > >>> and what cause of the big bang clearly.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > >>> the small space that
> > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > >>> from each other.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > >>> MORE space.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So, without using mathematics...
> > > >>> you just simply..
> > > >>> "picture" it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You think in terms of a
> > > >>> photograph.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Picture..a night sky
> > > >>> with so many stars
> > > >>> so close to each other
> > > >>> you can barely can see
> > > >>> the night dark black sky.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Like a crowded Japanese train.
> > > >>> http://tx.english-ch.com/teacher/art/japan_subway_10.jpg
> > > >>> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SrCwqs7cYR4/UcUhrD8QqcI/AAAAAAAAAhU/gCnK9heE5q0/s1600/japan_subway_11.jpg
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> But with stars.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The Starmaker
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> In other words..
> > > >> you don't need math
> > > >> or methods like
> > > >> experiment and observation..
> > > >> to know whay caused the big bang
> > > >> and what existed before it..
> > > >>
> > > >> You just need to...'picture' it!
> > > >>
> > > >> You don't need to send
> > > >> rockit ships or big binoculos
> > > >> out to space...I mean really..
> > > >> what is Hubble sending back but...
> > > >> 'pictures'?
> > > >>
> > > >> You can 'picture it' yourself
> > > >> without leaving the ground.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's very easy to 'know'
> > > >> what caused the big bang
> > > >> and what exited before it...
> > > >> you 'picture it'.
> > > >>
> > > >> No math needed.
> > > >>
> > > >> No experiments or
> > > >> observation required.
> > > >>
> > > >> I already gave you the answer to
> > > >> what casued the big bang...
> > > >>
> > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > >>> the small space that
> > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > >>> from each other.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > >>> MORE space.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > >>
> > > >> Just by picturing it.
> > > >>
> > > >> And you will not find any holes, or
> > > >> any serious objections to it. Even it
> > > >> fits perfectly well
> > > >> with your math and
> > > >> any experiments or observation.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> This is CORRECT.
> > > >>> The Bang Bang was simply
> > > >>> an explosion of...
> > > >>> 'MORE Space'.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Before the big bang
> > > >>> the small space that
> > > >>> existed before was filled
> > > >>> with stars to a point that
> > > >>> if you looked at the night
> > > >>> sky...it appeared that the stars
> > > >>> were all within a quarter of an inch,
> > > >>> maybe an eighth of an inch or less
> > > >>> from each other.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> There was simply more stars
> > > >>> that filled the night sky that you
> > > >>> could barely see the night sky.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Trillion of years of stars being
> > > >>> born and barely dying...
> > > >>> an over population of stars
> > > >>> in a small amount of space led
> > > >>> to the explosion of the creation of
> > > >>> MORE space.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It also created a continue expansion of
> > > >>> more space, black holes to control
> > > >>> star population, shorter life span
> > > >>> of stars,  and new laws of physics.
> > > >>
> > > >> It cannot be refuted, it is accurate, correct and true.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The Starmaker
> > > >
> > > > Libs all think that fantasy is all anyone needs to "explain" life.
> > > >
> > > > Libs should NEVER be allowed to set ANY policy. Disaster from their
> > > > total ignorance is sure to follow. So many examples of this it is beyond
> > > > doubt.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Uh-uh, Ben. This guy's a theocrat who believes science, fiction and
> > > especially _science fiction_ should be outlawed. That's reactionary, not
> > > Commie.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > So Chrysi Kat, you are saying Albert Einstein is a reactionary...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 5. He Loathed Science Fiction
> >
> > Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion of
> > scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence from any
> > type of science fiction.
> > "I never think of the future. It comes soon enough." He also thought
> > people who claimed to have seen flying saucers should keep it to
> > themselves.
> >
> >
> > http://justbesplendid.tumblr.com/post/241094568/facts-about-einstein
> >
> >
> >
> > and he was a commie...if not the biggest commie in the world.
> 
> A pinko, but not a red.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_views_of_Albert_Einstein
> 
> He liked Bob Clampett's "Time For Beany," so he at least
> liked a bit of whimsical fantasy.
> 
> Kevin R



Over 1,400 pages of investigation by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, released recently under the Freedom of Information Act,
into the background of Einstein revealed that he was was a member,
sponsor, or affiliated with 34 communist fronts and served as honorary
chairman for three communist organizations. The report has the baffling
conclusion that Albert Einstein had more Communist affiliations than the
Soviet dictator Josef Stalin! 
https://vault.fbi.gov/Albert%20Einstein/Albert%20Einstein%20Part%205%20of%2014

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 13:05 -0800
  Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 15:11 -0600
    Re: "picture" it Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-27 22:22 +0100
  Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 23:58 -0800
      Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:33 -0500
      Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 17:02 -0800
        Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 19:59 -0600
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:09 -0800
    Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 03:32 -0500
      Re: "picture" it Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 06:43 -0700
        Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:49 -0800
          Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:12 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:19 -0800
            Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 23:22 -0800
              Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:33 -0600
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:14 -0800
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-01 22:00 -0800
            Re: "picture" it Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 07:31 -0600
              Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:15 -0800
                Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-29 08:21 -0800
              Re: "picture" it David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-12-01 09:19 -0600
      Re: "picture" it Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-11-28 09:13 -0700
        Re: "picture" it benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:53 -0500
  Re: "picture" it Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 11:24 -0800
    Re: "picture" it The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-28 16:35 -0800
      Re: "picture" it Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-29 10:41 -0700

csiph-web