Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.theory > #21382

Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism)

From André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.theory, comp.ai.philosophy, comp.ai.nat-lang, sci.lang.semantics
Subject Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism)
Date 2020-07-02 07:01 -0600
Organization Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism
Message-ID <rdklrg$jmk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (19 earlier) <COednUo1m9EDaGbDnZ2dnUU7-TvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <rdgtts$aml$1@dont-email.me> <Qd2dnZ-brdpbLmHDnZ2dnUU7-QfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <rdie0f$s3f$1@dont-email.me> <QuGdnZMVvcI0kmDDnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2020-07-01 16:35, olcott wrote:
> On 7/1/2020 11:35 AM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>> On 2020-07-01 10:03, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2020 9:54 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 2020-06-30 20:31, olcott wrote:
> 
>>> How about the set of all formals systems?
>>>
>>>      A language L on Σ is said to be recursive if there exists a
>>>      Turing machine M that accepts L and halts on every w in Σ+.
>>>      In other words, a language is recursive if and only if there
>>>      exists a membership algorithm for it. (Linz 1990:288).
>>
>> Why is it that you have such a difficult time grasping that a formal 
>> language and a formal system are not the same thing? The above is a 
>> definition of *formal language* not *formal system*.
> 
>      Formal system
>      A formal system is used for inferring theorems from axioms
>      according to a set of rules. These rules, which are used for
>      carrying out the inference of theorems from axioms, are the
>      logical calculus of the formal system.
>      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_system
> 
> Philosophically all formal systems decide membership in three sets based 
> on their rules-of-inference algorithm:
> (1) WFF
> (2) Theorem
> (3) Logical Consequence
> 
> 
>>> Linz, Peter 1990. An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata.
>>> Lexington/Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company, 288.
>>>
>>> I would formalize the general notion of a formal system as any recursive
>>> language having a membership algorithm.
>>
>> That isn't remotely a definition of 'formal system'.
> 
> It is a correct philosophical generalization of the most generic 
> property common to all formal systems.

Stating that formal systems have some properties isn't the same as a 
definition of a formal system.

Airplanes have wings. That's a true statement since having wings is a 
property which airplanes share. It isn't, however, a definition of 
'airplane'.

> That you are not good at 
> philosophy does not make me bad at logic.

No. The fact that you are bad at logic is what makes you bad at logic.

Remember on Jun 21 you posted the following two, contradictory statements?

(1) (All-True(Γ)  ∧ False(𝒞)) ↔ ¬Valid-Argument(Γ, 𝒞)
(2) (¬All-True(Γ) ∧ True(𝒞))  ↔ ¬Valid-Argument(Γ, 𝒞)

I pointed out they were contradictory. You claimed I was wrong. It took 
five or six posts to get you to acknowledge a contradiction so blatantly 
obvious that anyone who had attended the first few classes of a freshman 
introduction to logic should be able to see it.

Just last week you made it clear that you didn't even know what the 
definition of incompleteness was as you were defining it as 'missing or 
having inappropriate parts'.

So, here' a question: Given that you don't know how incompleteness is 
defined, and given that you are completely incapable or recognizing even 
the most obvious contradictions in your own claims, what on earth leads 
you to believe that you are qualified to find some 'contradiction' in 
Gödel's work which qualified logicians have somehow managed to overlook 
for almost a century?


>>


>>> Conventionally it would have
>>> three membership algorithms WFF(X), Valid(X) and Theorem(X).
>> And that isn't remotely the conventional definition.
> 
> Connvetional are great for communication preexisting ideas.
> They are a great hindrance to deriving new ideas.

Yes, we know. Everyone laughed at Einstein (except they didn't).

There have been cases where people have made breakthroughs in various 
fields by approaching problems in an unconventional one.

One thing which all such examples share, though, is that the people 
responsible for them were extremely well-versed in the conventional 
notation and methods as well. You are not.

>>>>>> Gödel shows that, for any formal system which satisfies the 
>>>>>> requirements he lays out, it is possible to construct a Gödel 
>>>>>> sentence. If we simply interpret what you write above in an 
>>>>>> informal sense and ignore your silly quantifiers, then Gödel 
>>>>>> effectively demonstrates that this is *true*.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah but here's the catch how can we prove that a sentence that 
>>>>> asserts it is logically equivalent to its own unprovability is true 
>>>>> without forming a contradiction?
>>>>
>>>> But, as everyone keeps pointing out to you, your "simplification" 
>>>> isn't what Gödel actually proved. If you want to claim there is some 
>>>> contradiction involved, you need to deal with Gödel's *actual* 
>>>> proof, not with your "simplification".
>>>
>>> If we examine the simplification we can directly see much more 
>>> clearly exactly what Gödel meant by:
>>>
>>>     "14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for
>>>      a similar undecidability proof." (Gödel 1931:40)
>>>
>>> Is he saying that although "Every epistemological antinomy can 
>>> likewise be used for a similar undecidability proof." that his 
>>> sentence is not an
>>> "epistemological antinomy"? Or is the "epistemological antinomy" 
>>> nature of his sentence difficult to see?
>>
>> It is *not* an epistemological antinomy at all. Here, what Gödel is 
>> essentially saying is that the idea he had was loosely inspired by a 
>> particular antinomy, and that other antinomies might likewise be used 
>> as the *metaphorical* basis for a range of proofs. His proof does 
>> *not* encode the antinomy to which he refers.
>>
>>> This is the magicians misdirection of the proof:
>>>     "15 In spite of appearances, there is nothing circular about
>>>     such a proposition, 
> 
> This is circularity:  G := ( F ⊬ G) "This sentence is unprovable"

That isn't a statement of logic, as has been repeatedly pointed out. Why 
bother reading at all if you're not going to attempt to actually process 
and absorb what you read?

> This NOT is circularity:  G ↔ (F ⊬ G)
> "This sentence is logically equivalent to its own unprovability"
> 
> 
>> since it begins by asserting the unprovability
>>>     of a wholly determinate formula (namely the q-th in the alphabetical
>>>     arrangement with a definite substitution), and only subsequently
>>>     (and in some way by accident) does it emerge that this formula is
>>>     precisely that by which the proposition was itself expressed."
>>>     (Gödel 1931:41)
>>>
>>> None-the-less
>>> ...a proposition
>>> ...begins by asserting the unprovability
>>> ...of a ... formula
>>> ...and ... subsequently
>>> ...does it emerge that this formula is
>>> ...precisely that by which the proposition was itself expressed.
>>>
>>> Paraphrase: A proposition asserts the unprovability of a formula
>>> that later turns out to be itself.
>>
>> Look. Here's a suggestion. Don't even attempt to read the text of the 
>> paper since you seem determined to read things into it which simply 
>> aren't there. Instead, focus entirely on the actual math and let that 
>> math speak for itself.
>>
>> André
>>
> 
> There is not really any subjective leeway of interpretation in these 
> words when you remove the subtle attempts at deflection:

There is even less subjective leeway if you look at Gödel's actual math 
as I suggested rather than trying to figure out what he intended by 
looking only at his prose.

André

>  >> ...a proposition
>  >> ...begins by asserting the unprovability
>  >> ...of a ... formula
>  >> ...and ... subsequently
>  >> ...does it emerge that this formula is
>  >> ...precisely that by which the proposition was itself expressed.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail 
service.

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-26 20:03 -0500
  Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-26 20:53 -0700
    Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-26 23:46 -0500
      Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-26 22:54 -0700
        Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 11:04 -0500
    Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2020-06-27 10:24 +0100
      Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 11:14 -0500
        Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 09:38 -0700
          Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 11:58 -0500
            Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 11:54 -0700
              Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 15:26 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 14:52 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 17:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 17:43 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 19:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-27 20:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-27 22:11 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-28 16:32 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-06-28 14:43 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-28 16:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-28 20:18 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-28 21:45 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-28 21:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-28 21:59 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 00:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-28 23:57 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 13:28 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-29 12:33 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 14:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-29 13:52 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 15:02 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-29 14:14 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 15:39 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-29 15:13 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-29 17:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-29 21:21 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 01:09 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 00:24 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 16:46 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 16:46 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 18:24 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 18:15 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 19:33 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 19:18 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 20:34 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 20:06 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 21:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-06-30 20:54 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-01 11:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-01 10:35 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-01 17:35 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> - 2020-07-01 22:47 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-02 07:01 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 10:51 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-02 10:46 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 13:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-02 13:37 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2020-07-02 08:53 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 09:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> - 2020-07-02 15:06 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 10:56 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> - 2020-07-02 22:52 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 18:35 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> - 2020-07-02 23:48 +0000
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 18:57 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-07-02 19:22 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-02 22:03 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-02 23:13 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 00:36 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-02 23:43 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 12:50 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 12:19 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 13:21 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 12:33 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 13:48 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 13:55 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 13:06 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 13:07 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 12:56 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 14:14 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 13:38 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-03 15:59 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-03 22:54 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-04 08:56 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-04 08:12 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-04 10:06 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-04 09:31 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V20 (Text Analysis) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-04 14:31 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V20 (Text Analysis) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-04 15:17 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V20 (Text Analysis) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-04 17:29 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-05 13:01 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-07-05 16:40 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-05 23:52 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 00:53 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-06 10:15 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2020-07-06 08:33 -0700
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-06 11:49 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-06 11:27 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-07 22:22 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-06 10:48 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2020-07-06 13:55 -0600
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-07 22:13 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V23 (Newspeak) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-07-07 22:44 -0500
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) Alan Smaill <smaill@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> - 2020-06-30 11:17 +0100
                Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V13 (Isomorphism) olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2020-06-30 08:44 -0500

csiph-web