Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.theory

comp.theory

141006 articles, 271 threads (numbers 17 – 141228) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) (281 replies, showing first 100 — browse in flat view) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-02 15:58 -0500
   → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-02 19:43 -0400
   → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-03 10:13 +0300
     → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-03 08:35 -0500
       → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-04 10:53 +0300
         → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-04 11:23 -0500
           → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-04 14:55 -0500
           → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-05 10:05 +0300
             → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 06:25 -0500
               → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 08:05 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 12:01 -0500
               → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-06 11:27 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 06:21 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-07 11:00 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-07 09:49 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-08 10:08 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 06:52 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 09:13 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-09 12:17 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-09 08:34 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-10 10:30 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 06:18 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 06:04 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 09:31 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 17:09 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 21:04 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 21:59 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 01:09 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 08:49 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 07:08 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 10:01 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-11 12:27 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-10 09:53 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-11 10:30 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 09:14 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-11 12:35 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-12 12:26 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 08:17 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-13 10:03 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 09:24 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-14 08:55 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-14 08:48 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-15 09:54 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-15 06:57 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-16 11:26 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 07:36 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:10 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 12:27 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 12:36 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:47 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:57 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:18 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:26 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 13:24 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:45 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:59 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 14:47 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 17:04 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 19:41 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 00:49 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:04 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 07:52 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:58 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:14 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 11:53 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 17:24 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 20:43 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 19:13 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:25 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 19:32 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:42 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:28 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 11:54 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-17 11:12 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:19 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-18 12:13 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 09:15 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 10:07 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-17 09:45 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:29 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-18 12:15 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-18 07:59 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-19 11:54 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-18 07:58 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-19 11:59 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 12:21 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-19 13:58 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 13:39 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-03 10:53 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-03 02:09 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-04 09:15 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-04 00:53 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-05 11:25 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-05 02:28 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-06 10:55 +0300
                 → a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-06 12:40 -0700
                 → Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-07 10:18 +0300
                 → Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-07 02:00 -0700
                 → Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-08 10:19 +0300
                 → Re: a hole in the church turing thesis? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-08 09:06 -0700
 
polcott wtf are you even arguing??? (45 replies) dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 14:06 -0700
   → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 16:19 -0500
     → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 14:46 -0700
       → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 16:53 -0500
         → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 16:13 -0700
           → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 18:20 -0500
             → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 16:27 -0700
               → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 18:36 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 17:51 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 20:23 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 20:13 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 22:56 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 01:21 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 07:45 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 12:09 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 14:49 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 15:10 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 13:27 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 15:52 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 20:12 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 23:00 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 21:23 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 08:59 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-04 09:21 +0300
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 10:29 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-05 11:50 +0300
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-05 11:11 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-06 11:09 +0300
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-06 08:54 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-07 10:09 +0300
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-07 09:13 -0500
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-08 10:27 +0300
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-14 02:14 -0700
               → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 19:07 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 20:14 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 20:16 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-01 20:21 -0700
       → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-01 20:57 -0700
         → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 07:32 -0500
           → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 11:59 -0700
           → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 12:08 -0700
             → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 14:48 -0500
               → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 13:20 -0700
                 → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 20:50 -0700
     → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> 2026-05-02 15:50 +0000
       → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 11:02 -0500
 
Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings (8 replies) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 08:59 -0500
   → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-12 11:03 -0700
     → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 15:52 -0500
       → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 08:03 -0700
         → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-13 10:32 -0500
           → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 08:39 -0700
             → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-13 11:02 -0500
               → yes another possible ct-thesis hole? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 09:45 -0700
               → yet another possible ct-thesis hole??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 09:49 -0700

~Page 1 of ~192 (articles 141204–141228) Older →

csiph-web