Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.ai.philosophy

comp.ai.philosophy

34013 articles, 915 threads (numbers 331 – 34536) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) (245 replies, showing first 100 — browse in flat view) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-02 15:58 -0500
   → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-02 19:43 -0400
   → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-02 23:35 -0500
     → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) polcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-02 23:39 -0500
   → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated (signature update) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-03 10:13 +0300
     → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-03 08:35 -0500
       → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-04 10:53 +0300
         → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 06:25 -0500
           → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 08:05 -0700
             → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-05 12:01 -0500
           → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-06 11:27 +0300
             → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 06:21 -0500
               → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-07 11:00 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-07 09:49 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-08 10:08 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Prolog Example olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 06:52 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 09:13 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-09 12:17 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-09 08:34 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-10 10:30 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 06:18 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 06:04 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 09:31 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 17:09 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 21:04 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 21:59 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 01:09 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 08:49 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 07:08 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 10:01 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-11 12:27 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-10 09:53 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-11 10:30 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 09:14 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-11 12:35 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-12 12:26 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 09:24 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-14 08:55 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-14 08:48 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-15 09:54 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-15 06:57 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-16 11:26 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 07:36 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:10 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 12:27 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 12:36 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:47 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 10:57 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:18 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:26 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 13:24 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:45 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 11:59 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 14:47 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 17:04 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-16 19:41 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 00:49 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:04 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 07:52 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:58 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:14 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 11:53 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 17:24 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 20:43 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 19:13 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:25 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 19:32 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:42 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 21:28 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 11:54 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-17 11:12 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:19 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-18 12:13 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 09:15 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 10:07 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-17 09:45 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 09:29 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-18 12:15 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-18 07:59 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-19 11:54 +0300
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-19 12:21 -0500
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2026-04-19 13:58 -0400
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-02 13:39 -0700
                 → Re: The notion of a "well founded justification tree" will be fully elaborated --- Correction Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-03 10:53 +0300
                 → Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 11:58 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-08 10:13 -0700
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 12:35 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-08 11:40 -0700
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-08 14:01 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-10 13:06 -0700
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 14:12 -0600
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 21:14 -0700
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-05-13 12:59 -0700
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 15:17 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-09 11:10 +0300
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-09 11:30 +0300
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-09 07:13 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-10 10:10 +0300
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 12:38 -0500
                 → Re: Simplifying the Church / Turing thesis olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-10 14:06 -0500
 
Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings (8 replies) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 08:59 -0500
   → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-12 11:03 -0700
     → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 15:52 -0500
       → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 08:03 -0700
         → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-13 10:32 -0500
           → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 08:39 -0700
             → Re: Olcott thesis: Every element of the body of knowledge that can be expressed in language can be expressed as relations between finite strings olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-13 11:02 -0500
               → yes another possible ct-thesis hole? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 09:45 -0700
               → yet another possible ct-thesis hole??? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> 2026-05-13 09:49 -0700
 
Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? (3 replies) Lawfare Review <noreply@mixmin.net> 2026-05-12 02:45 +0100
   → Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> 2026-05-12 05:58 +0200
   → Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> 2026-05-12 06:34 +0200
     → Re: Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature. What can be done? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> 2026-05-12 06:44 -0600
 
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science (63 replies) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 10:10 -0700
   → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-06 10:47 -0700
     → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-07 09:29 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-07 11:08 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 18:32 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-07 19:28 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 07:20 -0700
       → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-08 12:53 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-09 10:50 -0700
         → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 18:01 -0700
           → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 18:15 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 07:41 +0200
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 23:37 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 00:15 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 14:23 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 06:33 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 07:00 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-11 19:52 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-11 17:16 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-11 22:15 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 07:36 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 00:03 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 11:14 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 02:22 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 13:59 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 09:38 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 18:46 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-12 10:04 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-12 21:33 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-12 11:31 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-12 10:29 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-13 09:46 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-13 08:38 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 12:59 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 13:06 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-17 08:59 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> 2026-04-17 08:56 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 08:08 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science x3 <x@x.net> 2026-04-17 15:31 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-17 17:34 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2026-04-18 09:58 +0200
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-18 07:29 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-18 01:29 -0700
           → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-13 13:55 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-04-20 14:06 -0700
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-20 19:22 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 12:48 -0500
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-02 20:48 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 08:48 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 07:07 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:17 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:42 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 12:55 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 16:21 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 19:07 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 07:18 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 07:42 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 10:37 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 14:07 -0700
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 18:10 -0500
                 → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 14:10 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-02 21:46 -0700
               → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-05-03 09:06 -0700
             → Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2026-05-07 10:17 -0700
 
Microsoft gives up on Xbox Copilot AI (1 reply) Microsoft India <ruined.by.india@microsoft.com> 2026-05-06 01:39 +0200
   → [Spam] Re: Microsoft gives up on Xbox Copilot AI yancy <yancy@apple.com> 2026-05-07 10:10 +0200
 
Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? (3 replies) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-04 10:29 -0500
   → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-05 11:50 +0300
     → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-05-06 08:54 -0500
       → Re: polcott wtf are you even arguing??? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-05-07 10:09 +0300

~Page 1 of ~156 (articles 34487–34536) Older →

csiph-web