Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI

From	rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI
Date	2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
Message-ID	<n07j18Fsh8lU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <ZshnR.58901$dyxe.43567@fx21.iad> <n06fm5Fn9guU3@mid.individual.net> <uionR.299297$P2N3.189652@fx18.iad> <n072ldFq0htU4@mid.individual.net> <BHsnR.433694$jUc3.416353@fx09.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:58:56 -0500, Joel W. Crump wrote:

> On 2/24/2026 8:47 PM, rbowman wrote:
> 
>>> Newsom isn't relevant to national politics.  AOC and potentially
>>> others would eat him alive in 2028 debates.  Newsom is the polar
>>> opposite of DeSantis in FL, they serve their own states fairly well
>>> but have zilch on the national stage.
>> 
>> He certainly wants to be relevant, hence his belated move toward
>> center. I would like to see him go up against AOC. They can discuss
>> foreign policy.
> 
> 
> Forget about Newsom running for president.  He probably wouldn't even
> win his own state over AOC, in the primaries.

He can give it his best shot. It's always amusing when the Democratic 
primaries turn into a clusterfuck and the DNC rolls out their 'super 
delegates' to select the person whose 'turn' it is. Problem is I don't 
think they have anyone waiting in the wings. Jeffries has been making bank 
for the Dems but i don't think he'll fly west of the Hudson. Mayor Pete 
has problems too.

Spamburger (top google search this evening) might be warming up. There are 
some other governors like Whitmer but they don't have much name 
recognition at this point. Gallego? Beshear?  One thing is for sure -- 
Harris should have an unfortunate tumble if she even tries to climb up on 
a podium.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
  Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
    Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
      Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
  Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
    Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
              Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000

csiph-web