Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707867
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI |
| Date | 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n08upjF4lh3U4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <n072ldFq0htU4@mid.individual.net> <BHsnR.433694$jUc3.416353@fx09.iad> <n07j18Fsh8lU1@mid.individual.net> <eaynR.326423$ZXtc.22679@fx47.iad> <KEynR.618661$VkX3.295320@fx16.iad> |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 03:45:29 -0500, Joel W. Crump wrote: > As I'm watching her response speech (I passed out during Trump's speech, > I hadn't slept Monday night), I think she really is a contender, > potentially. I prefer AOC, but I would easily vote for either of them. AOC should have done her homework before she went to Munich but she has plenty of time to recover. I don't think she has a chance; the DNC will screw her over like they did with Bernie. He should have went independent and started building an organization. In their own words the DSA isn't a party. 'We are a political and activist organization, not a party;' 'Not a party' isn't a way to start building ballot access.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000
csiph-web