Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707807

Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI
Date 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
Message-ID <n06ee1Fn9guU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <1896b710ed382884$73954$1518841$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10nhivp$2vlch$1@dont-email.me> <VnYmR.147005$qcD6.78640@fx08.iad> <n03prfFa2knU8@mid.individual.net> <10nk229$3ptdq$7@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:29:13 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> AI Overview:
> 
>     Vim Popularity: Studies show Vim (including Vi/Neovim) as a top-4
>     editor in various surveys, with usage often over 30% among specific
>     developer groups.
> 
>     Emacs Usage: Recent data indicates Emacs has declined to 8-9% or
>     less in recent surveys.
> 
>     Comparative Usage: A 2018 Opensource.com survey indicated 58% for
>     Vim vs. 27% for Emacs, though more recent data suggests a wider gap.

I've always used the Vim extension for VS Code. I did a reinstall of the 
Pi's OS and it comes with Geany. After a little searching I found Geany 
has a variety of plugins and vim is one of them. The developer says he 
doesn't use Vim itself so it might be a little strange but so far it works 
fine for me. I don't use some of the more exotic Vim stuff but the basics 
are all there, except :q. He couldn't find a way to get Geany to exit. :w 
works.

Unfortunately gvim (vim-gtk) doesn't work on a Pi. It became second nature 
so I didn't realize I was using the mouse to move the cursor as much as I 
do although I don't use the visual mode.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
  Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
    Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
      Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
  Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
    Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
              Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000

csiph-web