Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707861

Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI

From Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI
Date 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
Organization None
Message-ID <10nn5vr$sg6k$5@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <10nhucq$33tum$5@dont-email.me> <10nj7vp$3ilbb$2@dont-email.me> <n05098Fg4r9U3@mid.individual.net> <10nk1sg$3ptdq$6@dont-email.me> <n06er0Fn9guU2@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:

> On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:26:08 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:04:11 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> My guess is the corrupt DOJ is illegally protecting Trump above all
>>>> others.
>>>
>>> The corrupt DOJ during the Biden administration would have been all
>>> over them like stink on shit if they could have nailed Trump without a
>>> gaggle of Democrats joining him in the perp walk.
>> 
>> :-D
>> 
>> What a quaint thing to say.
>> 
>> Especially given the current cover-up.
>> 
>> As if both "sides" don't have ultra-rich predators pulling the strings
>> of government.
>
> A pox on both their houses. I'm starting to agree with Curtis Yarvin 
> (Mencius Moldbug). Bring on Caesar!

Uh, right now we have Caligula Lite.

No sane man would summarily pulverize the East Wing.

> iirc Spengler saw that as the last 
> stage of 'civilization'. 
>
> <snip>

-- 
Yow!  I want my nose in lights!

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
  Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
    Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
      Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
  Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
    Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
              Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000

csiph-web