Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707820
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI |
| Date | 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10nl3tm$7b42$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <10nhivp$2vlch$1@dont-email.me> <VnYmR.147005$qcD6.78640@fx08.iad> <10nhmr3$31n9r$2@dont-email.me> <10nhucq$33tum$5@dont-email.me> <18972fbf513db912$24413$1308711$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
On 2/24/2026 7:51 AM, Lying Larry Pietraskiewicz (aka Farley Flud) wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:14:18 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>
>> Did you search the Epstein files? <joke>
>>
>> Actually, given your proclivity for data mining, maybe you should!
>>
>
> The dullard DooFus does not engage in "data mining."
Pipe down, fraud. Keep dreaming up lies and fantasies about yourself:
- I am *ALWAYS* right. ALWAYS.
- 280 IQ
- advanced math degree from Columbia
- $50K payoff for solving some equations for the DoD
- C Programmer Extraordinaire
- adjunct professor in mechanical engineering
- gimp asked you to implement netpbm HDR formats
- ImageMagick asked you to implement AI
> Data mining involves extracting information from various disparate
> sources and then forming valid statistical inferences based on a
> collation of that information. Such methods are WAY BEYOND his
> current, and future, pathetic computing abilities.
'Cause linear regression and ANOVA can only be accomplished by 3 people
in the world.
Didn't I ask you to write a descriptive stats program in C to analyze a
set of random integers? And didn't you run away like you ALWAYS do? Yes
you did.
And didn't I write such a program from scratch? Yes I did.
It was another in an endless series of Feeb coding and IT failures.
> The demented DooFus can only accomplish basic piddling things
> that are straight out of "Databases 101." It's the same kind
> of chintzy shit that can be found in a Girl Scout computer camp.
During my Usenet data capture activities I discovered the two biggest
frauds in cola's history:
#1 will forever be Rex Ballard, who claimed that one year he was single-
handedly responsible for 10% of FedEx annual revenue, and his work
led to Linux, and he and Stallman wrote the GPL together, and he was
responsible for the web-browsing industry, and Robin Williams Mork
character was based on Rex's theater performance, and Rex's Usenet
posts were the basis for Nick Negroponte's "Being Digital", and
Microsoft used Rex's ideas in Windows 2000, and Java got hold of the
code from a project Rex managed then changed that code "a bit" and
released it as Java... and on and on and on.
#2 YOU - for the nearly endless spew of lies and ridiculous claims about
yourself, such as those above.
Both of you crazies are GuhNoo/Linux adherents. It's not a coincidence.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000
csiph-web