Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707809

Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI

From rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI
Date 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
Message-ID <n06er0Fn9guU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <10nhmr3$31n9r$2@dont-email.me> <10nhucq$33tum$5@dont-email.me> <10nj7vp$3ilbb$2@dont-email.me> <n05098Fg4r9U3@mid.individual.net> <10nk1sg$3ptdq$6@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:26:08 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:
> 
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:04:11 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> My guess is the corrupt DOJ is illegally protecting Trump above all
>>> others.
>>
>> The corrupt DOJ during the Biden administration would have been all
>> over them like stink on shit if they could have nailed Trump without a
>> gaggle of Democrats joining him in the perp walk.
> 
> :-D
> 
> What a quaint thing to say.
> 
> Especially given the current cover-up.
> 
> As if both "sides" don't have ultra-rich predators pulling the strings
> of government.

A pox on both their houses. I'm starting to agree with Curtis Yarvin 
(Mencius Moldbug). Bring on Caesar! iirc Spengler saw that as the last 
stage of 'civilization'. 

"Many people in Europe are apt to believe without saying it, or to say 
without believing it, that one of the great advantages of universal 
suffrage is, that it entrusts the direction of public affairs to men who 
are worthy of the public confidence. They admit that the people is unable 
to govern for itself, but they aver that it is always sincerely disposed 
to promote the welfare of the State, and that it instinctively designates 
those persons who are animated by the same good wishes, and who are the 
most fit to wield the supreme authority. I confess that the observations I 
made in America by no means coincide with these opinions. On my arrival in 
the United States I was surprised to find so much distinguished talent 
among the subjects, and so little among the heads of the Government. It is 
a well-authenticated fact, that at the present day the most able men in 
the United States are very rarely placed at the head of affairs; and it 
must be acknowledged that such has been the result in proportion as 
democracy has outstepped all its former limits. The race of American 
statesmen has evidently dwindled most remarkably in the course of the last 
fifty years."

'Democracy in America'  Alexis De Tocqueville  1835

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/815/815-h/815-h.htm#link2HCH0030

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-22 23:59 +0000
  Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Phil Da' Lick" <Givepeeceachance@peacpipe.org> - 2026-02-23 02:03 +0000
    Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-02-23 03:54 +0000
      Re: The Great Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 06:42 -0500
  Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 07:59 -0500
    Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 08:13 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 09:05 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 09:15 -0500
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-23 11:14 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-23 23:04 -0500
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 06:54 +0000
              Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:26 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-24 06:19 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:42 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:23 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 15:59 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 01:47 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 20:58 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 06:26 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:12 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 03:45 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-25 18:53 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:09 +0000
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:54 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-02-25 16:01 -0600
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 17:30 -0500
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2026-02-26 21:21 +0100
                Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 07:46 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 12:51 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:07 -0500
      Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-23 19:58 +0000
        Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:29 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-24 20:02 +0000
            Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-25 10:52 -0500
          Re: The Repulsive Not a Dr. Richard M. Stallman Recognized by AI vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-02-27 07:46 +0000

csiph-web