Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #105805
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Threading is foobared? |
| Date | 2016-03-27 14:18 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.69.1459048748.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <56f74d00$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> writes: > Am I the only one who has noticed that threading of posts here is > severely broken? It's always been the case that there have been a few > posts here and there that break threading, but now it seems to be much > more common. I can't give an objective assessment of whether it has increased or to what extent. Thanks for pointing out an objective symptom, though: munging of the message ID values in various fields. The resulting broken threads are a constant source of annoyance. I don't know whether any one host is the culprit, or whether there are many hosts that are munging the message IDs. What you've demonstrated is that at least one host is violating communication standards by altering existing reference fields on messages in transit. -- \ “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his | `\ salary depends upon his not understanding it.” —Upton Sinclair, | _o__) 1935 | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-27 14:01 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-27 14:18 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-27 02:25 -0400
Re: Threading is foobared? Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2016-03-27 11:29 +0100
Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-29 12:26 +0200
Re: Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-30 10:43 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-30 10:37 +0200
Re: Threading is foobared? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-03-29 23:54 +0000
Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 23:34 -0400
csiph-web