Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #106019

Re: Threading is foobared?

From Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Threading is foobared?
Date 2016-03-29 23:54 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ndf4k7$jn0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <56f74d00$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Steven D'Aprano wrote:

> Am I the only one who has noticed that threading of posts here is severely
> broken? It's always been the case that there have been a few posts here and
> there that break threading, but now it seems to be much more common.
>
> For instance, I see Jerry Martens' post "help with program". According to my
> newsreader, KNode, there are no replies to that thread. But I see a reply
> from Chris A. Chris' reply has a header line:
>
> In-Reply-To: <1392737302.749065.1459024715818.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
>
> but Jerry's original has:
>
> References:
> <1392737302.749065.1459024715818.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
>
> Notice the difference? Here the two values lined up:
>
> <1392737302.749065.1459024715818.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
> <1392737302.749065.1459024715818.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
>

Just read on Usenet instead of through the mailing list.  That way
you can accept broken threading as a given rather than wonder why it's
happening in a particular case.

-- 
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com

Email address domain is currently out of order.  See above to fix.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-27 14:01 +1100
  Re: Threading is foobared? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-27 14:18 +1100
  Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-27 02:25 -0400
  Re: Threading is foobared? Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2016-03-27 11:29 +0100
  Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-29 12:26 +0200
    Re: Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-30 10:43 +1100
      Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-30 10:37 +0200
  Re: Threading is foobared? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-03-29 23:54 +0000
    Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 23:34 -0400

csiph-web