Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30069
| Date | 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) |
| References | <983c532f-3ff6-4bd2-bb48-07cf4d065a4b@googlegroups.com> <mcd2681b5rfgofvctd24durtavpg7c1moe@invalid.netcom.com> <50618C96.4000709@tim.thechases.com> <k3s3dg$511$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1325.1348573147.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 09/25/12 06:10, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 25/09/2012 11:51, Tim Chase wrote: >> If only other unnamed persons on the list were so gracious rather >> than turning the flame-dial to 11. >> > > Oh heck what have I said this time? You'd *like* to take credit? ;-) Nah, not you or any of the regulars here. The comment was regarding the flame-fest that's been running in some parallel threads over the last ~12hr or so. Mostly instigated by one person with a particularly quick trigger, vitriolic tongue, and a disregard for pythonic code. -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500
csiph-web