Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine?

From	"Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine?
Date	2013-07-06 00:18 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<kr7jth$ref$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <d3515fe4-5421-47f3-b590-bff7e4d9584c@googlegroups.com> <18f27274-dc2c-4cda-95e7-a3526b319786@googlegroups.com> <bde62eee-6e01-422c-b2c6-104080ee6855@googlegroups.com> <1d68e6bc-f11c-4bd8-a907-fc819f0d4373@googlegroups.com> <ef461c0a-4955-4104-a17c-2f669ebfccfa@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/07/2013 05:30:54,  wrote:
> On Thursday, July 4, 2013 2:58:19 AM UTC-7, Alex McDonald wrote:
>> On Thursday, 4 July 2013 02:41:28 UTC+1, hughag...@yahoo.com  wrote:
>> Heapsort and a linked list merge sort differ in that heapsort is unstable
> , and it requires auxiliary space. So much for "theoretically the
> same". Yo u mean that they are both worst case O(n log n); that's not
> the only criter ia for categorising or selecting a sort.
> 
> HeapSort doesn't require auxiliary memory.

I miswrote (or rather, I wasn't clear enough with my comparison).
Heapsort requires a small constant amount of auxiliary storage *if it
uses tail recursion*; for a recursive solution, it requires proportional
to lg(n) of call stack space, as does a link list merge.

IIRC your novice package is not tail recursive. It could be, but it would
also require a Forth that supports tail recursion.   

> 
> The reason why I use HeapSort rather than QuickSort, is because
> HeapSort is more consistent in how much time it takes, whereas
> QuickSort varies a lot depending upon how well-ordered the original
> data is. This is important for micro-controllers, where consistency is
> hugely important (although the nov ice package isn't for
> micro-controllers, so that doesn't apply there).

But quicksort is, on the average, much faster that heapsort. Only when
the input is sorted is quicksort appreciably slower (for large n, yes, it
can be hugely expensive) so it's fairly standard practice to swap the
imput before starting. And quicksort has really good locality of
reference, unlike heapsort that jumps about everywhere. Is that
important? If speed and consistency are important, and n is relatively
small (as I presume it would be in a micro controller) then quicksort can
be made to win just about every time.

In other words, I think you've possibly got this back to front. Picking a
sort depends on a lot of factors, not just one.

> 
> QuickSort is so simple that it is easy to memorize. In a job
> interview, if they want me to write a sort program on the blackboard,
> I'll go with QuickS ort for this reason --- I can't remember how to
> implement HeapSort without looking it up, although HeapSort is what I
> actually use in practice.

Why? It isn't the best sort every time, since the best depends on what
you want to achieve.

> 
>> > I wouldn't be so bold as to say that the MergeSort is certainly faster
> and that somebody else "ought" to use it, without having actually
> tried the technique first myself.
>>
>> In other words, you don't have a clue, yet you're happy to spout off abou
> t code quality, sorting in general and the superiority of you novice
> code w ithout any justification.
> 
> I have never implemented a MergeSort --- maybe I will do so for the
> next no vice-package release. It is awkward right now, that I have two
> ways to sort lists, the InsertionSort for small lists, and the
> BIG-SORT (convert to and from an array of pointers) for big lists. It
> would be better to just have one list-sort function. I will still keep
> InsertionSort though, for the cas e where items are added to the list
> one at a time, and inserted into a sort ed position --- this is
> actually a lot more common than building up an enti re list unsorted,
> and then sorting it all in one fell swoop --- in my own p rograms that
> use list.4th, this is all that I've ever done.

Your data and code seems to require an adaptive sort. There are adaptve
versions of merge sort and heap sort. Or even a pre-swap to ensure the
data isn't sorted; then use quicksort. 

And the sorted results will possibly be different, since some sorts are
stable like merge sort; others aren't. An insertion sort can be either. 

> 
> Writing code for the novice package isn't just a way to benefit my
> legion o f users (I don't actually have any users, afaik), but it is
> also a way for me to learn new stuff.
> 

Which is an admirable goal. But you once claimed that you didn't read
anybody else's code or academic type articles. Remember the splay trees
argument? That same lack of research and certainty in your own rightness
shows in this set of posts too. You'd be a much better programmer -- and
perhaps have some appreciative users of your library -- if you took a
little time to check before sending crash and burn posts.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 13:12 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-25 23:48 -0700
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 09:11 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-06-26 02:03 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-06-26 11:25 -0500
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 12:36 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-26 09:49 -1000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-26 20:24 +0000
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-26 20:23 +0000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-26 13:35 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-26 16:37 -0700
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 01:31 -0700
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-06-27 04:04 -0500
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 09:27 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 13:23 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 21:48 +0100
              Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 16:53 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-01 04:34 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 18:41 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-04 02:58 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-04 21:30 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-06 00:18 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-06 13:45 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 07:49 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-06 13:38 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 10:06 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 23:08 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:24 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 23:47 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 09:59 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:52 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 12:18 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-08 00:06 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-08 09:50 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-08 03:14 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 09:53 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-09 14:25 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-09 23:39 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-09 18:03 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-10 23:05 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:21 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 10:29 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 05:44 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 04:07 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 06:06 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 14:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 04:45 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 05:09 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-10 12:16 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 10:38 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 06:45 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 13:56 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 10:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-10 13:57 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 07:15 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 13:52 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 15:00 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-10 16:13 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 17:07 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 10:53 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 10:40 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:17 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 16:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-12 03:07 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 00:43 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 00:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 20:32 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:38 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 07:05 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 13:00 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:47 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 21:22 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 19:25 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 21:58 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 02:27 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-08 21:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-09 04:20 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 10:30 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 15:13 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 13:57 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 16:57 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-10 13:00 -1000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 22:19 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 10:23 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-11 01:12 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 00:33 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-11 11:48 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-11 03:08 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 05:00 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 10:17 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 06:53 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-11 15:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 10:37 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:07 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:19 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:33 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-11 18:18 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 16:46 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-12 03:48 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-12 10:55 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-12 19:29 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-12 13:22 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-13 20:05 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-14 11:34 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-14 09:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 16:05 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 06:12 +0300
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 22:17 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 11:44 +0300
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-15 09:42 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-16 18:03 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-17 00:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-14 10:09 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 15:35 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:08 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:30 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 09:34 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Michael Morris <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 23:09 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-16 17:46 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-17 03:14 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-17 21:47 -0400
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-11 04:06 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 20:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 16:48 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 21:24 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-04 14:41 +0000
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-27 01:59 -0700
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 09:30 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 12:59 -0700
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-06-27 00:08 +0200
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 19:31 -0400
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 06:26 -0400
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-28 02:05 +0000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-04 07:33 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-05 00:47 +0200
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-14 19:01 +0000
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-15 01:28 +0000
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ian Osgood <iano@quirkster.com> - 2013-07-19 11:29 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-19 09:09 -0700

csiph-web