Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Single Thread Performance |
| Message-ID | <jwvk43r259i.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <1083982.844.1328506553065.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbtr6> <cc21bb69-16bf-4692-a8b4-7244bdc87a94@vd8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jh3uqm$c2$1@gosset.csi.cam.ac.uk> <jh3veo$ojd$1@adenine.netfront.net> <18985540.1742.1328921030856.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqks7> |
| Date | 2012-02-12 21:50 -0500 |
> Transactional Memory is an attempt to get around the inability
> of ATOMIC events to make forward progress in the face of contention.
Another perspective is that atomicity is a higher-level concept than
locks, which might lead to fewer bugs. IOW it is hoped that more
programmers are able to use correctly atomicity than locks. Also, it is
easier to automatically check that all shared objects are accessed
atomically rather than checking that the locks are used correctly.
Whether it's sufficiently better (and whether it can be made to perform)
is still up for debate, of course,
Stefan
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Single Thread Performance "Unspecified" <partha@perfectvips.com> - 2012-02-04 21:54 +0530
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 05:55 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 13:06 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 14:12 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-06 13:36 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 20:47 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-06 15:07 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 16:32 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 17:45 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-07 06:01 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 13:32 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 19:08 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-10 08:56 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 20:42 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 19:36 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-06 18:28 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 22:23 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-07 06:52 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-06 12:10 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Thomas Womack <twomack@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-07 10:13 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-20 23:58 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 17:33 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance nedbrek <nedbrek@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-15 08:10 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 14:17 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance del cecchi <delcecchi@gmail.com> - 2012-02-25 22:07 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-07 17:57 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2012-02-05 13:13 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-05 21:35 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 17:38 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-07 14:54 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 21:33 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-07 23:13 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-08 18:54 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-08 15:17 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-09 08:13 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 17:08 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:01 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-09 07:56 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-08 10:17 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Jon <jon@beniston.com> - 2012-02-08 05:32 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-07 16:00 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-08 18:35 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Partha <parthaspanda22@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 11:32 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-10 20:31 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance "Unspecified" <partha@perfectvips.com> - 2012-02-11 02:12 +0530
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-10 21:04 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-10 16:43 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-10 19:48 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2012-02-12 21:50 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-12 19:45 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-12 20:36 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-13 06:46 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-13 08:58 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Paul A. Clayton" <paaronclayton@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 16:19 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 03:55 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 10:30 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2012-02-14 10:49 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 13:21 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2012-02-14 13:11 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-14 09:29 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-14 12:40 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-14 16:12 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:14 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:16 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-14 09:26 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-15 08:44 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-15 01:07 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 10:16 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-08 01:04 -0800
csiph-web