Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Single Thread Performance |
| Date | 2012-02-14 09:29 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <12511083.751.1329240598042.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynt13> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <4F392235.1020804@SPAM.comp-arch.net> <16314332.739.1329152301273.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> <ae37e65b-43ea-42b6-80cf-d7ba5598bbdc@j14g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <jhclv8$h80$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com> <u5mp09-p191.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> |
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:30:05 AM UTC-6, Terje Mathisen wrote: > Rick Jones wrote: > > It may not really apply at all, but for some reason the lack of a > > guarantee of forward progress reminds me of CSMA/CD in Ethernet and > > "capture effect" which was prevalent before full-duplex became the > > norm. > > Standard Ethernet has one huge advantage: > > Exponential randomized backoff is part of the spec. As long as everyone > implements this you get stable operation and guaranteed forward progress. Would it not be better if the interface to Ethernet provided the backoff number instead of having to compute it on the fly? Thus, instead of a loop that exponentiates the backoff counter outside a loop that does the waiting, there would only be the waiting loop. This is why My ASF went to the trouble to build a device to give SW that number. Mitch
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Single Thread Performance "Unspecified" <partha@perfectvips.com> - 2012-02-04 21:54 +0530
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 05:55 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 13:06 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 14:12 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-06 13:36 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 20:47 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-06 15:07 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 16:32 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-06 17:45 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-07 06:01 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 13:32 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 19:08 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-10 08:56 -0700
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-06 20:42 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 19:36 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-06 18:28 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 22:23 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-07 06:52 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-06 12:10 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Thomas Womack <twomack@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2012-02-07 10:13 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Brett Davis <ggtgp@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-20 23:58 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 17:33 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance nedbrek <nedbrek@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-15 08:10 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 14:17 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance del cecchi <delcecchi@gmail.com> - 2012-02-25 22:07 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-07 17:57 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2012-02-05 13:13 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-05 21:35 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 17:38 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-07 14:54 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-07 21:33 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-07 23:13 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-08 18:54 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-08 15:17 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-09 08:13 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 17:08 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:01 -0600
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-09 07:56 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-08 10:17 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Jon <jon@beniston.com> - 2012-02-08 05:32 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-07 16:00 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2012-02-08 18:35 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Partha <parthaspanda22@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 11:32 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-10 20:31 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance "Unspecified" <partha@perfectvips.com> - 2012-02-11 02:12 +0530
Re: Single Thread Performance nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2012-02-10 21:04 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-10 16:43 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-10 19:48 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-12 14:31 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2012-02-12 21:50 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-12 19:45 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-12 20:36 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-13 06:46 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-13 08:58 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance "Paul A. Clayton" <paaronclayton@gmail.com> - 2012-02-13 16:19 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 03:55 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 10:30 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2012-02-14 10:49 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 13:21 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2012-02-14 13:11 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-14 09:29 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-14 12:40 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2012-02-14 16:12 -0500
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:14 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:16 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2012-02-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Single Thread Performance MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2012-02-14 09:26 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-15 08:44 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance "Andy (Super) Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2012-02-15 01:07 -0800
Re: Single Thread Performance Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2012-02-14 10:16 +0100
Re: Single Thread Performance Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-08 01:04 -0800
csiph-web