Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268850

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date	2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<hg803.apea3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <m50egk$3t4$3@dont-email.me> <bvhd9.f3aw03@rooftop.invalid> <D0994494.41B95%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <r73otlmb.zje@rooftop.invalid> <D0994889.41BA5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/14, 8:31 PM, in article r73otlmb.zje@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/24/14, 8:14 PM, in article bvhd9.f3aw03@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> ...
>>>>> Naturally, you ran away from the question:  How do you conspiracy losers
>>>>> pick and choose which events are "hoaxes"?
>>>> 
>>>>> Bring it.  I want to hear the idiocy behind the idiocy.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If it looks, walks, and quacks a certain way.
>> 
>>> And you look, act, and speak like an irrational conspiracy theorist.
>> 
>>> I, on the other hand, prefer rationality.
>>> ... 
>> 
>> LOL!
>> 
> By all means, if you think a claim of mine is not rational then quote it and
> explain why. Back your claims with evidence and logic and reason.

> But you will not.

You've declared that I will not.  I guess that ends it.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:15 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:10 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
      Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700

csiph-web