Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268834
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Global Warming is not real science |
| Date | 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <bvhd9.f3aw03@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <D096B0ED.419D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <gbcve9r.jge@rooftop.invalid> <m4tbm7$req$3@dont-email.me> <ghe80f.ae032@rooftop.invalid> <m50egk$3t4$3@dont-email.me> |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 11/23/2014 3:32 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 11/22/2014 11:39 PM, owl wrote: >> >> >>>> The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology. >> >> >>> The biggest proof of mental illness is a denial of reality, as >>> demonstrated repeatedly by you "hoaxer" idiots. >> >>> I do wonder how you morons pick and choose which events are "hoaxes". I >>> think your one and only criteria is whatever gets you the most attention >>> (which is the same way a 3rd grader chooses whether to pee or poop his >>> pants and tell everyone). > Naturally, you ran away from the question: How do you conspiracy losers > pick and choose which events are "hoaxes"? > Bring it. I want to hear the idiocy behind the idiocy. If it looks, walks, and quacks a certain way. >> If Gene Rosen's involved, then it's a hoax. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igfczc6m5M4 > So says the lamebrain "truthers" who haven't experienced shitty people > like themselves denying the occurrence of a devastating tragedy in their > own lives. You seriously have no questions about this Rosen guy? Have you even watched this freakshow? >> I do wonder why the fact that no one died at Sandy Hook makes you hoax-denier >> morons so angry. > Hoaxer moron denials make me a little angry, but in the end you > dumbasses have to live with yourselves and your stupid paranoia. If [CIA intern/employee] Anderson Cooper scoffs at hoaxers, well that's all Dufus needs to know.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700
csiph-web