Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #269096

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date	2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<gheu903.fa3hh@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <m52322$eok$5@dont-email.me> <ghue0.3ar3@rooftop.invalid> <m53gq3$q3o$4@dont-email.me> <hgje0.fji3p2@rooftop.invalid> <D09AA2B1.41CFF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/25/14, 8:55 PM, in article hgje0.fji3p2@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/25/2014 8:16 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/24/2014 7:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, November 24, 2014 4:21:08 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hoaxer moron denials make me a little angry, but in the end you
>>>>>>> dumbasses have to live with yourselves and your stupid paranoia.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No point in being angry, people like owl, Slimer, etc., obviously have
>>>>>> brain chemistry issues.
>>>> 
>>>>> You have to be really weak-minded - a real lamebrain putz - to be a 9/11
>>>>> or Sandy Hook 'truther'.
>>>> 
>>>> I say Emilie Parker (far right) was photoshopped into this family photo:
>>>> 
>>>> http://jazztruther.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hi-res-photoshopped1.jpeg
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think?
>> 
>> 
>>> I doubt it was, but I'm sure it's possible.  Experts can do magic with
>>> Photoshop.
>> 
>>> Whether it's altered or not, by the family or not, it doesn't change the
>>> fact of her murder. Poor, sweet little girl - it breaks my heart.
>> 
>>> Debunking lowlifes:
>>> https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-emilie-parker-still-alive-after-san
>>> dy-hook.1054/
>> 
>>> May you hoaxer scumbags suffer 100-fold whatever pain you cause those
>>> Sandy Hook families.
>> 
>> The "mom" admits to photoshopping "Emilie" into the picture.

> And shows a bunch of other images with her in the family. In other words, no
> reason to think this is tied to any conspiracy at all.

>> Her explanation was to get a pic so that all the kids were looking at the
>> camera.  Only, the kid on the left... lol.  The mom says that she had
>> to hack the pics apart and put them back like a jigsaw puzzle.  Problem
>> with that explanation is the only change here was to insert Emilie.

> Why is that a problem? I will say, if you look at my last post, I did not
> think it was Photoshopped. If it was she did a good job.

It is a problem because:

A) She did not have to put this one back together "like a jigsaw puzzle."
It's merely one of the group photos as is, except for a different Emilie
pose inserted.

B) Her original motivation was to get one with all the kids looking at
the camera, yet this one still has the girl on the left *not* looking at
the camera.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
  Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
    Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
      Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
    Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 01:16 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 22:18 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 03:55 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:18 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:30 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:38 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 07:50 -0800
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:13 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-26 04:23 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 21:56 -0700
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 13:27 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 12:56 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 13:02 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-26 21:59 +0100
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 14:35 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 06:35 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 08:58 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 14:11 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 15:26 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 09:28 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-27 10:02 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:17 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-27 17:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 14:24 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:14 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:15 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 17:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:29 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 09:19 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 08:51 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-27 12:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 11:10 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 14:11 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-27 22:41 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-27 23:56 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:49 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 16:57 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:24 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 19:11 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 20:38 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 19:52 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-27 20:01 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-27 21:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-28 09:56 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:34 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-28 17:40 +0100
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 09:35 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-28 11:12 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 12:25 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 14:30 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-28 20:44 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-28 19:07 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-28 07:52 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-28 11:31 -0500
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-26 17:08 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-26 15:43 -0700
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 13:09 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 21:51 +0000

csiph-web