Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268530

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date	2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<bvnduw0.vaep3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <D096B50D.419D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hgnv9.e@rooftop.invalid> <D096C40B.419D9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mvj83a.dfapew@rooftop.invalid> <D0975B29.419F3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/14, 11:20 PM, in article mvj83a.dfapew@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>  11 Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada
>>>  27 American Academy of Pediatrics
>>>  28 American Anthropological Association
>>>  31 American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
>>>  34 American College of Preventive Medicine
>>>  41 American Public Health Association
>>>  43 American Society for Microbiology
>>>  45 American Society of Civil Engineers
>>>  47 American Statistical Association
>>>  55 Australian Medical Association
>>> 101 Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK
>>> 194 World Health Organization
>> 
>> Really?  Those are your climate-change experts?

> 1) You ignored 185 organizations and worked to hand pick the 12 you thought
> were the weakest. This is dishonest of you. I have the full list, again,
> below.

I'd say about 80% of the ones I didn't even bother to point out as irrelevant
are generic "Academy of Sciences" types with no specific focus on climatology
or solar science.  Also, where are the polls of the members of these
organizations?  A decree by the bureaucrats won't cut it.  Face it, Snit.
You don't care about real science.  All that is important to you is sticking
to a political narrative.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:05 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:12 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:22 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 19:37 +0000
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
      Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700

csiph-web