Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657835

Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

Message-ID	<dATDb3Ns-EM_md7VuYudUGCGh3c@jntp> (permalink)
Subject	Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
References	(5 earlier) <lm6u8sFg6sqU3@mid.individual.net> <yaZ0cAHFJUuBPEnLxaR54rNTkeQ@jntp> <lmc9i4Fas80U3@mid.individual.net> <Rl69eBWAWqiMMrespZGn0TKf208@jntp> <lmeu49Fn5ciU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2024-10-06 11:49 +0000
Organization	Nemoweb
From	Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

Le 06/10/2024 à 09:55, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> ? ? ?
> 
> We have speed of light, haven't we?
> 
> So, how do you come to 'instantaneous'?
>   ...

It is the structure of space-time that makes things as they are, but as 
the human mind does not want them to be.

The pack spirit is most often a spirit of laziness.

We do as the other does without asking questions, because it is painful 
and distressing, very tiring to ask questions, and man is naturally lazy 
(in civilian life, how many lazy people for one courageous man?)

If someone tries to calculate the infinite speed of light, he will never 
be able to do it, and it will take a new Michelson to find an experiment 
capable of doing it (perhaps from the experiments of Alain Aspect).

In the meantime, it is very complicated, and for 40 years, I have not 
found an idea to experiment to prove it.

Certainly, if we place two watches at A and B, we will have t=AB/c but 
this equation can also be written t=AB.And where Et is the universal 
transverse spatial anisochrony.

And what do I do when I calculate c, if not place myself in a transverse 
position each time?

So we find in a circle.

In any case, the concept that I give is certain, because it alone explains 
the Langevin paradox in a truly credible way (which avoids the unjustified 
objections of cranks and anti-relativists).

If you want a correct reasoning, you are obliged to go through the 
relativistic zoom effect, and this cannot be done either without an 
instantaneous interaction of light in the longitudinal direction.

I repeat, there exists for each observer, each entity of the universe a 
hyperplane of simultaneity. Everyone agrees on that.

But for me, it is personal, relative.

All the elements of a given frame have their own.

Physicists do not want to hear this.

They then come to imagine an abstract and false theory, with a common and 
absolute present time hyperplane for the entire frame.

This is obviously ridiculous and the opposite is easily demonstrable 
mathematically since we have a mathematical absurdity on apparent speeds), 
but not experimentally for the moment.

R.H.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-09-30 22:52 +0000
  Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 00:34 +0000
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-01 08:52 +0200
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 08:11 +0000
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:36 +0000
        Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:54 +0000
          Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:23 +0000
            Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:25 +0000
          Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-02 20:54 +0200
            Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:00 +0000
              Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:21 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:26 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:44 +0200
              Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:59 +0000
              Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:09 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:17 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:26 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:39 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:05 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:41 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:44 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:07 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:36 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 09:54 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:49 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:53 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:52 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 10:14 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-06 09:56 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:36 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:49 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-08 09:41 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-08 10:33 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:43 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 13:01 +0000
            Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 20:07 +0000
              Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:12 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:03 +0000
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:22 +0000
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:45 +0000
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-02 10:07 +0300
  Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-10-07 21:10 +0000
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-07 23:27 +0200
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-07 21:46 +0000
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-07 23:40 +0000
        Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-08 12:38 +0000
      Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-09 12:43 +0300
        Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-09 12:28 +0000
          Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-10 11:01 +0300
            Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-10 12:33 +0000
              Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-11 12:28 +0300
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-11 11:52 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:15 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 08:40 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-12 12:05 +0300
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:42 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 11:56 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 12:22 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:11 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:17 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:45 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:56 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 16:25 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 16:53 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 08:36 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 10:54 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 09:17 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 14:16 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-13 09:02 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-13 12:38 +0000
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-14 10:12 +0200
                Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-13 11:59 +0300
  Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-10-14 19:38 +0800
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-14 11:55 +0000
    Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-14 15:16 +0200

csiph-web