Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657948
| Message-ID | <iRNX36SPeYHfaT2Nw0QLRNGFeLE@jntp> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity |
| References | (5 earlier) <lmujuuF5spvU1@mid.individual.net> <vede3t$3tmm$1@dont-email.me> <UIdzdVLJ9_wb6WmCm-cvy4bha8g@jntp> <fNdc9byx0D-QRMUCgQ04ZkqVZF0@jntp> <17fdb6a787402b0b$306002$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2024-10-12 13:17 +0000 |
| Organization | Nemoweb |
| From | Python <python@not-formail.invalid> |
Le 12/10/2024 à 15:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 12.10.2024 o 14:22, Python pisze: >> Le 12/10/2024 à 13:56, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> Le 12/10/2024 à 11:05, Mikko a écrit : >>>> >>>>> This is actually not true, because the world which SRT describes >>>>> isn't the world we live in. >>>> >>>> A failed attempt is still an attempt. Therefore your "because" is wrong. >>>> SR is an attempt to describe the world. Later it was found out that the >>>> world is different but that does not affect what SR is. >>>> >>>>> SRT is about a world, where all thinfgs drift around in a dark and >>>>> starless void, >>>> >>>> No, it is not. SR is about the geometry of the world, not about its >>>> matter >>>> content except that the matter content must be compatible with the >>>> geometry. >>> >>> SR is first and foremost an attempt to explain the Michelson-Morley >>> experiment. >>> >>> The calculation shows that, according to the experiment, w=v+c=c >> >> It does not. >> >>> Which is absurd. >> >> Indeed. But only you say that. > > And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit > to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid Nobody rejected Euclid. > poor stinker. Nice signature.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-09-30 22:52 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 00:34 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-01 08:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 08:11 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:54 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:23 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 13:25 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-02 20:54 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:00 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:21 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:26 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-02 21:44 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 19:59 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:09 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:26 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:39 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:05 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:41 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:44 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:07 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:36 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 09:54 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:49 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-03 12:53 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 09:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 10:14 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-06 09:56 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:49 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-08 09:41 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-08 10:33 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:43 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 13:01 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-02 20:07 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-03 09:12 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-03 13:03 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:22 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-01 12:45 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-02 10:07 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-10-07 21:10 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-07 23:27 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-07 21:46 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-07 23:40 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-08 12:38 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-09 12:43 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-09 12:28 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-10 11:01 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-10 12:33 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-11 12:28 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-11 11:52 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:15 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 08:40 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-12 12:05 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:42 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 11:56 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 12:22 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:11 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 15:45 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-12 13:56 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 16:25 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-12 16:53 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 08:36 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 10:54 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-13 09:17 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 14:16 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-13 09:02 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-13 12:38 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-14 10:12 +0200
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-13 11:59 +0300
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-10-14 19:38 +0800
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-14 11:55 +0000
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-14 15:16 +0200
csiph-web