Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268508

Re: Global Warming is not real science

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Global Warming is not real science
Date	2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
Organization	ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand
Message-ID	<gbcve9r.jge@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References	<04dd86f6-9f33-4b9d-84a4-a7b2e07478c9@googlegroups.com> <h2gue0a3f.gph@rooftop.invalid> <D096B0ED.419D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/14, 9:22 PM, in article h2gue0a3f.gph@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.moneynews.com/mkt-news/Scientist-Confesses-Global-Warming-a-$22-B/
>>> 2014/11/17/id/607827/?snit-falls-for-every-liberal-scam
>> 
>>> One leading scientist -- Kevin Trenberth -- admitted "The fact is that we
>>> can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we
>>> can't." A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their
>>> government funding.
>> 
>>> In another email, Dr. Phil Jones -- a leading "global warming" advocate at
>>> the United Nations -- admitted that he used "Mike's Nature trick" in a 1999
>>> graph to "hide the decline" in temperature.
>> 
>>> And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how
>>> ridiculous "climate scientists" can get with data manipulation. Here is what
>>> he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has
>>> been "adjusting" its record by replacing real temperatures with data
>>> "fabricated" by computer models."
>> 
>> 
>>> Some people are as stupid as the left wing politicians need them to be.
>> 
>> Global Warming/Climate Change is definitely a scam, but couldn't you find
>> a better reference than some guy hawking his newsletter?

> I would love to see your best evidence that the mass of science, from many
> disciplines and sources, and being fought by some of the biggest sources of
> money on the planet, is a "scam".

Many disciplines?  Why? 

>> <quote>
>> That's a Total Velue of $180 . . . in Return for Your $5 Contribution Today.
>> ...
>> 
>> To be clear, the minimum contribution when you join the Cold Truth
>> Initiative is $5. But you are allowed to contribute more . . .
>> </quote>
>> 
>> It is interesting though that on this issue you decide *not* to rely on
>> the same appeal-to-authority fallacy that you use to deny the Sandy Hook
>> hoax.

> The biggest predictor of belief in one unsupportable conspiracy theory is
> the belief in another.

The biggest predictor of mental illness is a degree in psychology.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-11-21 16:05 -0800
  Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:22 +0000
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:30 -0700
      Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 04:39 +0000
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 21:47 -0700
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 05:04 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-22 22:51 -0700
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 06:20 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 09:36 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 17:27 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 10:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-23 14:09 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2014-11-23 13:27 -0600
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:01 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 13:00 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science "alt.support.heartburn" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-11-23 19:21 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:48 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-23 14:14 -0500
          Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-23 20:32 +0000
            Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:27 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:08 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:52 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:17 -0500
              Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:14 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:24 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:31 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:41 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 03:50 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:54 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 04:06 +0000
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:39 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:31 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-25 18:12 +0000
          Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 15:14 -0700
            Re: Global Warming is not real science owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-24 03:01 +0000
              Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:49 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 08:51 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 08:55 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 09:19 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 10:58 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:50 -0800
                Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:08 -0500
                Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 12:33 -0700
    Re: Global Warming is not real science Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 08:24 -0800
      Re: Global Warming is not real science WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-24 12:09 -0500
        Re: Global Warming is not real science Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 11:03 -0700

csiph-web