Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.dreams.castaneda > #18531
| Newsgroups | alt.dreams.castaneda |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-21 15:00 -0700 |
| References | (16 earlier) <18299db0-b4e4-4fec-bcbd-626e081e9e7c@googlegroups.com> <op.znzqarxx7eafsp@slider> <e171e4d6-bf45-4476-b070-93cb1cada415@googlegroups.com> <op.zn0gzqnf7eafsp@slider> <op.zn36qqwx7eafsp@slider> |
| Message-ID | <b7ff63e6-2126-41e1-af2f-1cdbc4889b44@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) |
| From | "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> |
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 at 1:48:19 PM UTC-7, slider wrote: > ### - just in case i 'may' have doubted anything; the universe then comes > back at me with this :) Yeah, I'm sure the universe is really concerned. > Charlie: (today) > Now I remember why it took me so long to read this book. Something in me > must have known the end would indeed be the sweetest, most refreshing > piece of work I’ve ever read in my life on this planet. > > So for over a year I read a little here and a little there, only to be > blown back after gently closing the last page. My name is Charlie, and, I > have read more than six books concerning the intricacies of lucid dreaming > (Journey to Ixtalan, The Art of Dreaming, Lucid Dreaming Plain & Simple, > A Field Guide to Lucid Dreaming, The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep & > The WILD Way to Lucid Dreaming), and, to this day, have yet to see one > with the switch-blade accuracy it includes. > > This book is no less than a revolutionary piece of art. With everything > concerning debate stripped away to leave only the exact process so as to > keep the reader from jumping to conclusions about this or that, The WILD > Way To Lucid Dreaming TRULY is the most practical of all guides created. > > *** > > alright alright fuck me, that's enough! i submit haha! :D > > damn, it's almost enough to make me blush? > > + says he's gonna write some of the the above on amazon US as a review > (cool) > > cheers universe for reminding me that not 'everyone' i've cast my pearl(s) > before is/was a swine? > > ahahaha :) Well good, it's about time a few people who like it reviewed it. Geez, I mean, tens of thousands of people liked Scientology, right? (Dianetics by Hubbard, on US Amazon - 4.1 stars w/ 933 reviews.) There are still only 4 reviews of your book on US Amazon, and mine seems the most relied on. It says under my review: "17 people found this helpful". I honestly never thought mine would be the most prominent (though admittedly, it's accurate). :) The next closest review in popularity is a 1-star review entitled "Not Recommended"... where it says "6 people found this helpful." I think that one's unfair, though. Your book isn't that bad, although the reviewer's written critique is essentially correct. He says: "the author sets you up to fail by giving you a technique that is unlikely to work, tells you how easy it is and then criticizes a much easier and more widely practiced method of lucid dreaming... This technique might have better odds of working if the author instructed you to attempt WILDs at a time of night when you are in REM sleep which is after 4-6 hours of sleep. He instead implies you can do this right at bed and it will work. This is highly unlikely... I think he found a technique that works for him (maybe) and so makes the false assumption that it is the best method and will be easy for everyone else." A just criticism. While your method itself is good, most people won't get it to work right when they first lie down to sleep. Better to use WBTB. But a one-star review is far too harsh. I also agree with your positive reviewer above on one thing. The simplicity of your stripped-down method is far better than a lot of metaphysical whoopla any day. But are we going to have to hear about it every single time anybody buys or likes it? :) You know, back when Amy Wallace was around if I'd done that I'd have had to make tens of thousands of posts here about it. Right? So could you maybe tell us like every 100 sales or something? .
Back to alt.dreams.castaneda | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-10 21:27 +0100
sleeping & dreaming feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 13:36 -0700
Re: sleeping & dreaming slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-10 22:08 +0100
Re: sleeping & dreaming feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 14:18 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-10 22:41 +0100
gas yourself ahole feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 09:19 -0700
Re: gas yourself ahole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-13 18:19 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-15 11:39 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 10:50 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-15 21:11 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 17:18 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-16 04:10 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 09:30 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-16 21:03 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 15:15 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:10 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-17 02:47 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-17 15:09 +0100
ADA feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 07:46 -0700
Re: ADA slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-17 18:16 +0100
and in the end ........... feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 11:30 -0700
Re: and in the end ........... slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-17 20:41 +0100
Re: and in the end ........... "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 15:38 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 15:33 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-18 03:42 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 13:02 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-19 01:30 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 17:55 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-19 02:25 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 21:05 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 23:07 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-19 12:02 +0100
the horses are at the starting gate feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:35 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 12:00 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-19 21:39 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 13:57 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-20 08:52 +0100
good day at the track feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 08:05 -0700
Re: good day at the track slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-20 20:19 +0100
Re: good day at the track feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 12:32 -0700
let it ride bitch feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 12:45 -0700
Re: let it ride bitch slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-20 21:12 +0100
Re: let it ride bitch feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:17 -0700
Re: let it ride bitch slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-21 09:55 +0100
Re: let it ride bitch feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 07:28 -0700
Re: let it ride bitch slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-21 16:03 +0100
Re: good day at the track slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-20 20:56 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:55 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-21 21:48 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 15:00 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-21 23:13 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 15:30 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-21 23:57 +0100
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 08:24 -0700
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 14:15 -0700
fucking wake up feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 16:24 -0700
Re: fucking wake up "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 17:07 -0700
Re: fucking wake up slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-19 01:42 +0100
Re: fucking wake up "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 17:56 -0700
Re: fucking wake up slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-19 02:06 +0100
Re: fucking wake up thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:17 +0800
Re: conformation/validation? absolutely! :) slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-15 22:22 +0100
csiph-web