Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659390

Re: if physics is dead

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: if physics is dead
Date	2024-12-07 10:03 -0800
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<67548DF4.EA8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<675142A7.152F@ix.netcom.com> <67514C87.5B20@ix.netcom.com> <67521909.1CC9@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > then engineering would be dead...
> > >
> > > isn't that right?
> >
> > i mean, it appears to me
> > that someone here claims
> > physics is dead and
> > they happen to be in
> > engineering.
> >
> > Obviously, they don't understand
> > the relation of physics to
> > engineering.
> >
> 
> Here is one example...
> 
> the engineers send rocketships to space, and it blows up
> because the engineers don't know the physics.
> 
> if something gets too cold, it stops working.
> 


Engineers live in one world...and Scientists live in another world.


Scientisits live in a world of...exaggeration, beyond the bounds of
truth.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Thread

if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:05 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:47 -0800
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 13:20 -0800
      Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 10:03 -0800
        Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-08 12:58 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-06 15:43 +0000
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-06 16:28 -0800

csiph-web