Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659376

Re: if physics is dead

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: if physics is dead
Date	2024-12-06 16:28 -0800
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<675396AA.6FEA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<675142A7.152F@ix.netcom.com> <7a33c20504c2452d368faa83f78508b5@www.novabbs.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Bertietaylor wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 6:05:27 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > then engineering would be dead...
> 
> Engineering will survive wrong physics thanks to Arindam.
> >
> > isn't that right?
> 
> No. The death of wrong e=mcc=hv physics is eminently desirable and
> absolutely necessary for stupendous engineering following Arindam's
> physics.
> 
> Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
> 
> Bertietaylor

"Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof"???? Son of Sam?


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:05 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 22:47 -0800
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 13:20 -0800
      Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 10:03 -0800
        Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-08 12:58 -0800
  Re: if physics is dead bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-06 15:43 +0000
    Re: if physics is dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-06 16:28 -0800

csiph-web